Machine learning-based radiomics for predicting BRAF-V600E mutations in ameloblastoma.


Journal

Frontiers in immunology
ISSN: 1664-3224
Titre abrégé: Front Immunol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560960

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 06 03 2023
accepted: 31 07 2023
medline: 31 8 2023
pubmed: 30 8 2023
entrez: 30 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Ameloblastoma is a locally invasive and aggressive epithelial odontogenic neoplasm. The BRAF-V600E gene mutation is a prevalent genetic alteration found in this tumor and is considered to have a crucial role in its pathogenesis. The objective of this study is to develop and validate a radiomics-based machine learning method for the identification of BRAF-V600E gene mutations in ameloblastoma patients. In this retrospective study, data from 103 patients diagnosed with ameloblastoma who underwent BRAF-V600E mutation testing were collected. Of these patients, 72 were included in the training cohort, while 31 were included in the validation cohort. To address class imbalance, synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) is applied in our study. Radiomics features were extracted from preprocessed CT images, and the most relevant features, including both radiomics and clinical data, were selected for analysis. Machine learning methods were utilized to construct models. The performance of these models in distinguishing between patients with and without BRAF-V600E gene mutations was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. When the analysis was based on radiomics signature, Random Forest performed better than the others, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.87 (95%CI, 0.68-1.00). The performance of XGBoost model is slightly lower than that of Random Forest, and its AUC is 0.83 (95% CI, 0.60-1.00). The nomogram evident that among younger women, the affected region primarily lies within the mandible, and patients with larger tumor diameters exhibit a heightened risk. Additionally, patients with higher radiomics signature scores are more susceptible to the BRAF-V600E gene mutations. Our study presents a comprehensive radiomics-based machine learning model using five different methods to accurately detect BRAF-V600E gene mutations in patients diagnosed with ameloblastoma. The Random Forest model's high predictive performance, with AUC of 0.87, demonstrates its potential for facilitating a convenient and cost-effective way of identifying patients with the mutation without the need for invasive tumor sampling for molecular testing. This non-invasive approach has the potential to guide preoperative or postoperative drug treatment for affected individuals, thereby improving outcomes.

Sections du résumé

Background
Ameloblastoma is a locally invasive and aggressive epithelial odontogenic neoplasm. The BRAF-V600E gene mutation is a prevalent genetic alteration found in this tumor and is considered to have a crucial role in its pathogenesis. The objective of this study is to develop and validate a radiomics-based machine learning method for the identification of BRAF-V600E gene mutations in ameloblastoma patients.
Methods
In this retrospective study, data from 103 patients diagnosed with ameloblastoma who underwent BRAF-V600E mutation testing were collected. Of these patients, 72 were included in the training cohort, while 31 were included in the validation cohort. To address class imbalance, synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) is applied in our study. Radiomics features were extracted from preprocessed CT images, and the most relevant features, including both radiomics and clinical data, were selected for analysis. Machine learning methods were utilized to construct models. The performance of these models in distinguishing between patients with and without BRAF-V600E gene mutations was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Results
When the analysis was based on radiomics signature, Random Forest performed better than the others, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.87 (95%CI, 0.68-1.00). The performance of XGBoost model is slightly lower than that of Random Forest, and its AUC is 0.83 (95% CI, 0.60-1.00). The nomogram evident that among younger women, the affected region primarily lies within the mandible, and patients with larger tumor diameters exhibit a heightened risk. Additionally, patients with higher radiomics signature scores are more susceptible to the BRAF-V600E gene mutations.
Conclusions
Our study presents a comprehensive radiomics-based machine learning model using five different methods to accurately detect BRAF-V600E gene mutations in patients diagnosed with ameloblastoma. The Random Forest model's high predictive performance, with AUC of 0.87, demonstrates its potential for facilitating a convenient and cost-effective way of identifying patients with the mutation without the need for invasive tumor sampling for molecular testing. This non-invasive approach has the potential to guide preoperative or postoperative drug treatment for affected individuals, thereby improving outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37646022
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1180908
pmc: PMC10461083
doi:

Substances chimiques

Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf EC 2.7.11.1
BRAF protein, human EC 2.7.11.1

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1180908

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Li, Li, Liu, Wang, Chen, Qian, Zheng, Chen, Liu and Lin.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Oct;104(4):478-85
pubmed: 17524681
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Apr;161:110731
pubmed: 36804312
J Oral Pathol Med. 2018 Oct;47(9):836-846
pubmed: 29964338
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016 Jul;122(1):e5-7
pubmed: 27209484
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021 Mar;16(3):415-422
pubmed: 33547985
Front Oral Health. 2021 Sep 14;2:740788
pubmed: 35048058
J Dent Res. 2015 Feb;94(2):237-40
pubmed: 25425580
Oral Dis. 2018 Apr;24(3):307-316
pubmed: 28142213
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Jan 01;11(1):e70-e75
pubmed: 30697397
Insights Imaging. 2020 Aug 12;11(1):91
pubmed: 32785796
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Mar;62(3):427-432
pubmed: 34635382
Exp Mol Pathol. 2014 Dec;97(3):345-53
pubmed: 25194300
Head Neck Pathol. 2022 Mar;16(1):63-75
pubmed: 35312978
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Dec;108(6):904-13
pubmed: 19800270
Radiology. 2016 Feb;278(2):563-77
pubmed: 26579733
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan 1;17:1533033818782788
pubmed: 29940810
NMR Biomed. 2022 Nov;35(11):e4792
pubmed: 35767281
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Nov 1;20(21):5517-26
pubmed: 24993163
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Aug;15(9):e371-81
pubmed: 25079100
Chin J Cancer Res. 2018 Dec;30(6):677-678
pubmed: 30700936
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121143
pubmed: 34410397
Eur Radiol. 2018 May;28(5):2058-2067
pubmed: 29335867
Radiology. 2020 May;295(2):328-338
pubmed: 32154773
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 27;11:793417
pubmed: 35155194
World J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 24;11(1):31-42
pubmed: 31976308
J Oral Pathol Med. 2019 Mar;48(3):201-205
pubmed: 30489659
Int J Oncol. 2016 Mar;48(3):1258-70
pubmed: 26794206
J Digit Imaging. 2023 Jun;36(3):911-922
pubmed: 36717518
J Clin Pathol. 2022 Aug;75(8):555-559
pubmed: 33827932
Biomark Cancer. 2015 Oct 04;7(Suppl 2):19-24
pubmed: 26483612
J Oral Pathol Med. 2016 Nov;45(10):780-785
pubmed: 27084044
Br J Radiol. 2017 Feb;90(1070):20160665
pubmed: 27936886
Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;77(21):e104-e107
pubmed: 29092951
J Nucl Med. 2020 Apr;61(4):488-495
pubmed: 32060219
Nat Genet. 2014 Jul;46(7):722-5
pubmed: 24859340
J Oral Pathol Med. 2016 Oct;45(9):704-711
pubmed: 26841348
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Aug;88(2):170-6
pubmed: 10468461
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Mar;64(3):484-94
pubmed: 16487813
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Dec 21;19(1):281
pubmed: 31864346
Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;77(14):3922-3930
pubmed: 28566328
Korean J Pathol. 2013 Jun;47(3):191-202
pubmed: 23837011
J Oral Pathol Med. 2022 Mar;51(3):223-230
pubmed: 35090195

Auteurs

Wen Li (W)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Yang Li (Y)

School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Xiaoling Liu (X)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Li Wang (L)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Wenqian Chen (W)

School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Xueshen Qian (X)

School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Xianglong Zheng (X)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Jiang Chen (J)

School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Yiming Liu (Y)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Lisong Lin (L)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH