Pharmacokinetics of Temozolomide in a Patient With Glioblastoma Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Short Communication.


Journal

Therapeutic drug monitoring
ISSN: 1536-3694
Titre abrégé: Ther Drug Monit
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7909660

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 12 12 2022
accepted: 22 05 2023
medline: 30 8 2023
pubmed: 30 8 2023
entrez: 30 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Temozolomide (TMZ) is an alkylating agent used to treat glioblastoma. However, the pharmacokinetics of TMZ to establish a treatment strategy for patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) remain unclear. In this case report, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics and HD removal rate of TMZ in a patient with glioblastoma undergoing HD to determine optimal dosing of TMZ. A 78-year-old man with glioblastoma who underwent HD 3 times a week was treated with TMZ concomitant with radiotherapy. One dose of TMZ was prescribed at 75 mg/m2 on the day before HD and another dose of 37.5 mg/m2 on the day before non-HD. Peak and trough concentrations (1 hour and 12 hours after dosing, respectively) were evaluated before HD and on non-HD days. HD removal rate of TMZ was calculated based on the predialyzer and postdialyzer plasma concentrations. Furthermore, the TMZ plasma concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The mean plasma peak and trough concentrations ± SD after 75 mg/m2 TMZ were 2917 ± 914 and 108 ± 17.6 ng/mL, respectively. Those after 37.5 mg/m2 TMZ dosage were 1305 ± 650 and 53.8 ± 11.8 ng/mL, respectively. The mean HD TMZ removal rate was 84.9 ± 1.9%. TMZ was tolerable in patients undergoing HD. Based on the data from a single individual pharmacokinetic perspective, the pharmacokinetics of TMZ in this patient undergoing HD were comparable with those observed in patients with normal renal function. In addition, it may be reasonable to administer TMZ after HD because of the high HD removal rate.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Temozolomide (TMZ) is an alkylating agent used to treat glioblastoma. However, the pharmacokinetics of TMZ to establish a treatment strategy for patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) remain unclear. In this case report, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics and HD removal rate of TMZ in a patient with glioblastoma undergoing HD to determine optimal dosing of TMZ.
METHODS METHODS
A 78-year-old man with glioblastoma who underwent HD 3 times a week was treated with TMZ concomitant with radiotherapy. One dose of TMZ was prescribed at 75 mg/m2 on the day before HD and another dose of 37.5 mg/m2 on the day before non-HD. Peak and trough concentrations (1 hour and 12 hours after dosing, respectively) were evaluated before HD and on non-HD days. HD removal rate of TMZ was calculated based on the predialyzer and postdialyzer plasma concentrations. Furthermore, the TMZ plasma concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
RESULTS RESULTS
The mean plasma peak and trough concentrations ± SD after 75 mg/m2 TMZ were 2917 ± 914 and 108 ± 17.6 ng/mL, respectively. Those after 37.5 mg/m2 TMZ dosage were 1305 ± 650 and 53.8 ± 11.8 ng/mL, respectively. The mean HD TMZ removal rate was 84.9 ± 1.9%.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
TMZ was tolerable in patients undergoing HD. Based on the data from a single individual pharmacokinetic perspective, the pharmacokinetics of TMZ in this patient undergoing HD were comparable with those observed in patients with normal renal function. In addition, it may be reasonable to administer TMZ after HD because of the high HD removal rate.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37646650
doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001125
pii: 00007691-990000000-00141
pmc: PMC10635330
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Nov 15;15(22):7092-8
pubmed: 19861433
Neurooncol Pract. 2020 Jan;7(1):111-117
pubmed: 32025326
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010 Mar;65(4):727-34
pubmed: 19641919
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2009 Mar;129(3):353-7
pubmed: 19252393
Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Feb;5(2):309-17
pubmed: 10037179
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96
pubmed: 15758009
Biochemistry. 1994 Aug 9;33(31):9045-51
pubmed: 8049205
Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Jun 1;10(11):3728-36
pubmed: 15173079
Int J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct;12(5):341-9
pubmed: 17929115
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2019 Jan 5;162:164-170
pubmed: 30243056

Auteurs

Fumiaki Tanaka (F)

Department of Pharmacy, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.

Kei Irie (K)

Department of Pharmacy, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Kobe Gakuin University, Kobe, Japan; and.

Nobuyuki Fukui (N)

Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.

Ryo Horii (R)

Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.

Hirotoshi Imamura (H)

Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.

Masaki Hirabatake (M)

Department of Pharmacy, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.

Hiroaki Ikesue (H)

Department of Pharmacy, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.

Nobuyuki Muroi (N)

Department of Pharmacy, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.

Shoji Fukushima (S)

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Kobe Gakuin University, Kobe, Japan; and.

Nobuyuki Sakai (N)

Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.

Tohru Hashida (T)

Department of Pharmacy, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Kobe Gakuin University, Kobe, Japan; and.

Classifications MeSH