Outcomes and potential impact of a virtual hands-on training program on MRI staging confidence and performance in rectal cancer.

Magnetic resonance imaging Neoplasm staging Rectal neoplasms

Journal

European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 18 05 2023
accepted: 16 07 2023
revised: 27 06 2023
medline: 30 8 2023
pubmed: 30 8 2023
entrez: 30 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To explore the potential impact of a dedicated virtual training course on MRI staging confidence and performance in rectal cancer. Forty-two radiologists completed a stepwise virtual training course on rectal cancer MRI staging composed of a pre-course (baseline) test with 7 test cases (5 staging, 2 restaging), a 1-day online workshop, 1 month of individual case readings (n = 70 cases with online feedback), a live online feedback session supervised by two expert faculty members, and a post-course test. The ESGAR structured reporting templates for (re)staging were used throughout the course. Results of the pre-course and post-course test were compared in terms of group interobserver agreement (Krippendorf's alpha), staging confidence (perceived staging difficulty), and diagnostic accuracy (using an expert reference standard). Though results were largely not statistically significant, the majority of staging variables showed a mild increase in diagnostic accuracy after the course, ranging between + 2% and + 17%. A similar trend was observed for IOA which improved for nearly all variables when comparing the pre- and post-course. There was a significant decrease in the perceived difficulty level (p = 0.03), indicating an improved diagnostic confidence after completion of the course. Though exploratory in nature, our study results suggest that use of a dedicated virtual training course and web platform has potential to enhance staging performance, confidence, and interobserver agreement to assess rectal cancer on MRI virtual training and could thus be a good alternative (or addition) to in-person training. Rectal cancer MRI reporting quality is highly dependent on radiologists' expertise, stressing the need for dedicated training/teaching. This study shows promising results for a virtual web-based training program, which could be a good alternative (or addition) to in-person training. • Rectal cancer MRI reporting quality is highly dependent on radiologists' expertise, stressing the need for dedicated training and teaching. • Using a dedicated virtual training course and web-based platform, encouraging first results were achieved to improve staging accuracy, diagnostic confidence, and interobserver agreement. • These exploratory results suggest that virtual training could thus be a good alternative (or addition) to in-person training.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37646807
doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10167-4
pii: 10.1007/s00330-023-10167-4
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Bregendahl S, Bondeven P, Grønborg TK et al (2022) Training of radiology specialists in local staging of primary rectal cancer on MRI: a prospective intervention study exploring the impact of various educational elements on the interpretive performance. BMJ Open Qual 11(3):e001716
doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001716 pubmed: 35944932 pmcid: 9367186
Sluckin TC, Hazen SMJA, Horsthuis K et al (2022) Significant improvement after training in the assessment of lateral compartments and short-axis measurements of lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer. Eur Radiol 33(1):483–492
doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08968-0 pubmed: 35802179 pmcid: 9755077
Wang S, Li XT, Zhang XY et al (2019) MRI evaluation of extramural vascular invasion by inexperienced radiologists. Br J Radiol 92(1104):20181055
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20181055 pubmed: 31596129 pmcid: 6913373
Siddiqui MRS, Gormly KL, Bhoday J et al (2016) Interobserver agreement of radiologists assessing the response of rectal cancers to preoperative chemoradiation using the MRI tumor regression grading (mrTRG). Clin Radiol 71(9):854–862
doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.05.005 pubmed: 27381221
Harden SP, Anstee A, Craven I et al (2022) Radiology training. What good looks like, now and in the future. Clin Radiol 77(12):902–903
doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2022.08.121 pubmed: 36116969 pmcid: 9477647
Ziegler E, Urban T, Brown D et al (2020) Open Health Imaging Foundation Viewer: an extensible open-source framework for building web-based imaging applications to support cancer research. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 4:336–345
doi: 10.1200/CCI.19.00131 pubmed: 32324447
Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M et al (2018) Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting. Eur Radiol 28(4):1465–1475
doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5026-2 pubmed: 29043428
Lambregts DMJJ, Bogveradze N, Blomqvist LK et al (2022) Current controversies in TNM for the radiological staging of rectal cancer and how to deal with them: results of a global online survey and multidisciplinary expert consensus. Eur Radiol 32(7):4991–5003
doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08591-z pubmed: 35254485 pmcid: 9213337
Lambregts DMJ, Boellaard TN, Beets-Tan RGH (2019) Response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer using modern MR imaging: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 10(1):15
doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0706-x pubmed: 30758688 pmcid: 6375095
Nougaret S, Reinhold C, Mikhael HW et al (2013) The use of MR imaging in treatment planning for patients with rectal carcinoma: have you checked the “distance.” Radiology 268(2):330–344
doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121361 pubmed: 23882096
Santiago I, Figueiredo N, Parés O, Matos C (2020) MRI of rectal cancer-relevant anatomy and staging key points. Insights Imaging 11(1):100
doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00890-7 pubmed: 32880782 pmcid: 7471246
Beets GL, Figueiredo NF, Beets-Tan RGH (2016) Management of rectal cancer without radical resection. Annu Rev Med 68:169–182
doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-062915-021419 pubmed: 27618750
Young ESGAR e-tutorials. https://www.esgar.org/young-esgar/e-tutorials . Accessed 1 Feb 2023
The Radiology Assistant : Rectal Cancer MR staging 3.0. https://radiologyassistant.nl/abdomen/rectum/rectal-cancer-mr-staging-1#restaging-after-neoadjuvant-treatment . Accessed 1 Feb 2023
Rafaelsen SR, Sørensen T, Jakobsen A et al (2008) Transrectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of rectal cancer. Effect of experience. Scand J Gastroenterol 43:440–446
doi: 10.1080/00365520701745842 pubmed: 18365909
Blomqvist L, Machado M, Rubio C et al (2000) Rectal tumor staging: MR imaging using pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils vs endoscopic ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 10(4):653–660
doi: 10.1007/s003300050979 pubmed: 10795550
Al-Sukhni E, Milot L, Fruitman M et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19(7):2212–2223
doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2210-5 pubmed: 22271205

Auteurs

Najim El Khababi (N)

Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
GROW School for oncology and reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Regina G H Beets-Tan (RGH)

Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
GROW School for oncology and reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Renaud Tissier (R)

Biostatistics Unit, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Max J Lahaye (MJ)

Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
GROW School for oncology and reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Monique Maas (M)

Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
GROW School for oncology and reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Luís Curvo-Semedo (L)

Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar E Universitario de Coimbra EPE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

Raphaëla C Dresen (RC)

Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Joost J M van Griethuysen (JJM)

Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Stephanie Nougaret (S)

Medical Imaging Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (U1194), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Geerard L Beets (GL)

GROW School for oncology and reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Baukelien van Triest (B)

Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Stuart A Taylor (SA)

Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.

Doenja M J Lambregts (DMJ)

Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. d.lambregts@nki.nl.
GROW School for oncology and reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands. d.lambregts@nki.nl.

Classifications MeSH