Interim analysis of patient-reported outcome compliance and dosimetry in a phase 3 randomized clinical trial of oesophagus-sparing spinal radiotherapy.

Metastatic spinal cord compression oesophagus-sparing radiotherapy patient-reported outcome measures phase III clinical trial

Journal

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
ISSN: 1651-226X
Titre abrégé: Acta Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8709065

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
medline: 8 11 2023
pubmed: 30 8 2023
entrez: 30 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The randomized clinical trial ESO-SPARE investigates if oesophagus-sparing radiotherapy (RT) can reduce dysphagia in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) is the only follow-up measure. Due to the fragile patient population, low respondent compliance was anticipated. We performed a planned interim analysis of dosimetry and respondent compliance, to ensure that the protocol requirements were met. Patients >18 years referred for cervical/thoracic MSCC radiotherapy in 1-10 fractions were included from two centres. Patients were randomized (1:1) to standard RT or oesophagus-sparing RT, where predefined oesophageal dose constraints were prioritized over target coverage. Patients completed a trial diary with daily reports of dysphagia for 5 weeks (PRO-CTC-AE) and weekly quality of life reports for 9 weeks (QLQ-C30, EQ-5D-5L). According to power calculation, 124 patients are needed for primary endpoint analysis. The sample size was inflated to 200 patients to account for the fragile patient population. The co-primary endpoints, peak patient-reported dysphagia, and preserved ability to walk (EQ-5D-5L), are analysed at 5 and 9 weeks, respectively. The interim analysis was conducted 90 days after the inclusion of patient no 100. Respondent compliance was assessed at 5 and 9 weeks. In all RT plans, oesophagus and target doses were evaluated regarding adherence to protocol constraints. From May 2021 to November 2022, 100 patients were included. Fifty-two were randomized to oesophagus-sparing RT. In 23% of these plans, oesophagus constraints were violated. Overall, the dose to both target and oesophagus was significantly lower in the oesophagus-sparing plans. Only 51% and 41% of the patients were evaluable for co-primary endpoint analysis at five and nine weeks, respectively. Mortality and hospitalization rates were significantly larger in patients who completed <4 days PRO questionnaires. Compliance was lower than anticipated and interventions to maintain study power are needed.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
The randomized clinical trial ESO-SPARE investigates if oesophagus-sparing radiotherapy (RT) can reduce dysphagia in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) is the only follow-up measure. Due to the fragile patient population, low respondent compliance was anticipated. We performed a planned interim analysis of dosimetry and respondent compliance, to ensure that the protocol requirements were met.
METHODS UNASSIGNED
Patients >18 years referred for cervical/thoracic MSCC radiotherapy in 1-10 fractions were included from two centres. Patients were randomized (1:1) to standard RT or oesophagus-sparing RT, where predefined oesophageal dose constraints were prioritized over target coverage. Patients completed a trial diary with daily reports of dysphagia for 5 weeks (PRO-CTC-AE) and weekly quality of life reports for 9 weeks (QLQ-C30, EQ-5D-5L). According to power calculation, 124 patients are needed for primary endpoint analysis. The sample size was inflated to 200 patients to account for the fragile patient population. The co-primary endpoints, peak patient-reported dysphagia, and preserved ability to walk (EQ-5D-5L), are analysed at 5 and 9 weeks, respectively. The interim analysis was conducted 90 days after the inclusion of patient no 100. Respondent compliance was assessed at 5 and 9 weeks. In all RT plans, oesophagus and target doses were evaluated regarding adherence to protocol constraints.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
From May 2021 to November 2022, 100 patients were included. Fifty-two were randomized to oesophagus-sparing RT. In 23% of these plans, oesophagus constraints were violated. Overall, the dose to both target and oesophagus was significantly lower in the oesophagus-sparing plans. Only 51% and 41% of the patients were evaluable for co-primary endpoint analysis at five and nine weeks, respectively. Mortality and hospitalization rates were significantly larger in patients who completed <4 days PRO questionnaires.
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
Compliance was lower than anticipated and interventions to maintain study power are needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37647380
doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2023.2251083
doi:

Types de publication

Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1496-1501

Auteurs

Anna Mann Nielsen (AM)

Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Katrine Smedegaard Storm (KS)

Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Michael R T Laursen (MRT)

Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Vanja Remberg Gram (VR)

Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Laura Ann Rechner (LA)

Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Wiviann Ottosson (W)

Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Morten Hiul Suppli (MH)

Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Patrik Sibolt (P)

Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Claus F Behrens (CF)

Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

Ivan R Vogelius (IR)

Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Gitte F Persson (GF)

Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH