Automated cross-sectional view selection in CT angiography of aortic dissections with uncertainty awareness and retrospective clinical annotations.
Aortic dissection
Double-oblique reformation
Imperfect annotations
Measurement
Reproducibility
Journal
Computers in biology and medicine
ISSN: 1879-0534
Titre abrégé: Comput Biol Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1250250
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2023
10 2023
Historique:
received:
09
05
2023
revised:
20
07
2023
accepted:
12
08
2023
medline:
27
9
2023
pubmed:
31
8
2023
entrez:
30
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Surveillance imaging of patients with chronic aortic diseases, such as aneurysms and dissections, relies on obtaining and comparing cross-sectional diameter measurements along the aorta at predefined aortic landmarks, over time. The orientation of the cross-sectional measuring planes at each landmark is currently defined manually by highly trained operators. Centerline-based approaches are unreliable in patients with chronic aortic dissection, because of the asymmetric flow channels, differences in contrast opacification, and presence of mural thrombus, making centerline computations or measurements difficult to generate and reproduce. In this work, we present three alternative approaches - INS, MCDS, MCDbS - based on convolutional neural networks and uncertainty quantification methods to predict the orientation (ϕ,θ) of such cross-sectional planes. For the monitoring of chronic aortic dissections, we show how a dataset of 162 CTA volumes with overall 3273 imperfect manual annotations routinely collected in a clinic can be efficiently used to accomplish this task, despite the presence of non-negligible interoperator variabilities in terms of mean absolute error (MAE) and 95% limits of agreement (LOA). We show how, despite the large limits of agreement in the training data, the trained model provides faster and more reproducible results than either an expert user or a centerline method. The remaining disagreement lies within the variability produced by three independent expert annotators and matches the current state of the art, providing a similar error, but in a fraction of the time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37647783
pii: S0010-4825(23)00830-2
doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107365
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
107365Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.