Parental perspectives about information and deferred versus two-stage consent in studies of neonatal asphyxia.

Ethics Neonatology

Journal

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition
ISSN: 1468-2052
Titre abrégé: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9501297

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 01 06 2023
accepted: 10 08 2023
pubmed: 31 8 2023
medline: 31 8 2023
entrez: 30 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The ALBINO Trial (NCT03162653) investigates effects of very early postnatal allopurinol on neurocognitive outcome following perinatal asphyxia where prenatal informed consent (IC) is impossible. Ethically and legally, waiver of consent and/or deferred consent (DC) is acceptable in such an emergency. Short oral/two-step consent (SOC, brief information and oral consent followed by IC) has recently been investigated. Mixed-methods analysis of parental opinions on DC versus SOC in the context of neonatal asphyxia in a survey at two German centres. Prospective parents (ProP), parents of healthy newborns (PNeo) and parents of asphyxiated infants (PAx) born between 2006 and 2016 were invited. 108 of 422 parents participated (ProP:43; PNeo:35; PAx:30). Most parents trusted physicians, wanted preinterventional information and agreed that in emergencies interventions should begin immediately. Intergroup and intragroup variability existed for questions about DC and SOC. In the ALBINO Trial situation, 55% preferred SOC, and 26% reported DC without information might adversely affect their trust. Only 3% reported to potentially take legal action after DC. PAx were significantly more likely to support DC. PAx more frequently expressed positive emotions and appreciation for neonatal research. In open-ended questions, parents gave many constructive recommendations. In this survey, parents expressed diverse opinions on consent, but the majority preferred SOC over DC. Parents who had experienced emergency admission of their asphyxiated neonates were more trusting. Obtaining parental perspectives is essential when designing studies, while being cognisant that these groups of parents may not represent the opinion of all parents.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37648417
pii: archdischild-2023-325900
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325900
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Christian A Maiwald (CA)

Department of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany Christian.Maiwald@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Center for Pediatric Clinical Studies (CPCS), University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Charlotte Rovers (C)

Department of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Annie Janvier (A)

Department of Pediatrics, Bureau de l'Éthique Clinique, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Division of Neonatology, Research Center, Clinical Ethics Unit, Palliative Care Unit, Unité de recherche en éthique clinique et partenariat famille, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Heidrun Sturm (H)

Centre for Public Health and Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Martina Michaelis (M)

Centre for Public Health and Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Georg Marckmann (G)

Institute of Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Bayern, Germany.

Hans-Joerg Ehni (HJ)

Institute for Ethics and History of Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Christian F Poets (CF)

Department of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Mario Rüdiger (M)

Clinic for Pediatrics, Department of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.

Axel R Franz (AR)

Department of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Center for Pediatric Clinical Studies (CPCS), University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH