Evaluating the impacts of patient engagement on a national health research network: results of a case study of the Chronic Pain Network.

Evaluation Patient and public involvement Patient engagement

Journal

Research involvement and engagement
ISSN: 2056-7529
Titre abrégé: Res Involv Engagem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101708164

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 01 06 2023
accepted: 22 08 2023
medline: 31 8 2023
pubmed: 31 8 2023
entrez: 30 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The Chronic Pain Network (CPN) is a pan-Canadian research network focused on innovating and improving the quality and delivery of pain prevention, assessment, management and research for all Canadians. An important focus of the CPN is to work in collaboration with patient partners. Patient partners, researchers and clinicians work together in all aspects of the research network including on funded research projects and in the governance of the Network. Given this focus, the CPN identified the importance of evaluating their patient engagement work to understand its functioning and impact. The objective of this exploratory evaluation case study was to understand the impacts of patient engagement on the CPN. The CPN worked with an external evaluation team which established an arms-length approach to the evaluation. Interviews were conducted with CPN members, including patient partners, leadership, funded researchers and committee co-chairs, at three discrete time points to trace the evolution of the patient engagement program within the Network. Key Network documents were also collected and reviewed. Data were analyzed following each set of interviews using content analysis guided by the principles of constant comparison and qualitative description. A final round of analysis was conducted using the Engage with Impact Toolkit, an impact measurement framework, to identify impacts of engagement. Impacts of patient engagement were identified at the individual, network, funded research project and research community levels. These impacts were observed in the following areas: (1) building community; (2) developing knowledge, skills and resources; (3) increasing confidence; (4) influencing priorities and decisions; (5) enabling additional opportunities; (6) promoting culture change; and, (7) coping with experiences of living with chronic pain. While not without challenges, the patient engagement efforts of the CPN demonstrates the impact engaging patient partners can have on a national research network and related policy activities. Understanding the approaches to, and impacts of, patient engagement on health research networks can illuminate the value of having patient partners engaged in all aspects of a research network and should serve as encouragement to others who look to take on similar work. The Chronic Pain Network (CPN) is one of a group of research networks that was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) to support patient-oriented research in chronic diseases. From the beginning of its work, the CPN has included patients as partners. Patient partners are co-chairs of all Network governance committees, funded projects are required to include patient partners in their work and there is a committee dedicated to engagement, the Patient Engagement (PE) committee. The PE Committee determined that it was important to evaluate how the CPN was engaging with patient partners and collaborated with the Public and Patient Engagement Collaborative (PPEC) to evaluate this work. The PPEC, along with members of the PE Committee, identified understanding the impact of patient engagement as an important part of the evaluation. This paper provides a description of the impacts of patient engagement on the people who were involved in the CPN, on the CPN’s work and way of being, and on the broader pain research community. Based on the results from three sets of interviews and review of Network documents, we share impacts identified in seven areas: (1) building community; (2) developing knowledge, skills and resources; (3) increasing confidence; (4) influencing priorities and decisions; (5) enabling additional opportunities; (6) promoting culture change; and, (7) coping with experiences of living with chronic pain. This research shows us the impact that engaging patient partners can have on a national research network, and the areas where greater focus could, perhaps, lead to even greater impacts in future networks.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The Chronic Pain Network (CPN) is a pan-Canadian research network focused on innovating and improving the quality and delivery of pain prevention, assessment, management and research for all Canadians. An important focus of the CPN is to work in collaboration with patient partners. Patient partners, researchers and clinicians work together in all aspects of the research network including on funded research projects and in the governance of the Network. Given this focus, the CPN identified the importance of evaluating their patient engagement work to understand its functioning and impact.
METHODS METHODS
The objective of this exploratory evaluation case study was to understand the impacts of patient engagement on the CPN. The CPN worked with an external evaluation team which established an arms-length approach to the evaluation. Interviews were conducted with CPN members, including patient partners, leadership, funded researchers and committee co-chairs, at three discrete time points to trace the evolution of the patient engagement program within the Network. Key Network documents were also collected and reviewed. Data were analyzed following each set of interviews using content analysis guided by the principles of constant comparison and qualitative description. A final round of analysis was conducted using the Engage with Impact Toolkit, an impact measurement framework, to identify impacts of engagement.
RESULTS RESULTS
Impacts of patient engagement were identified at the individual, network, funded research project and research community levels. These impacts were observed in the following areas: (1) building community; (2) developing knowledge, skills and resources; (3) increasing confidence; (4) influencing priorities and decisions; (5) enabling additional opportunities; (6) promoting culture change; and, (7) coping with experiences of living with chronic pain.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
While not without challenges, the patient engagement efforts of the CPN demonstrates the impact engaging patient partners can have on a national research network and related policy activities. Understanding the approaches to, and impacts of, patient engagement on health research networks can illuminate the value of having patient partners engaged in all aspects of a research network and should serve as encouragement to others who look to take on similar work.
The Chronic Pain Network (CPN) is one of a group of research networks that was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) to support patient-oriented research in chronic diseases. From the beginning of its work, the CPN has included patients as partners. Patient partners are co-chairs of all Network governance committees, funded projects are required to include patient partners in their work and there is a committee dedicated to engagement, the Patient Engagement (PE) committee. The PE Committee determined that it was important to evaluate how the CPN was engaging with patient partners and collaborated with the Public and Patient Engagement Collaborative (PPEC) to evaluate this work. The PPEC, along with members of the PE Committee, identified understanding the impact of patient engagement as an important part of the evaluation. This paper provides a description of the impacts of patient engagement on the people who were involved in the CPN, on the CPN’s work and way of being, and on the broader pain research community. Based on the results from three sets of interviews and review of Network documents, we share impacts identified in seven areas: (1) building community; (2) developing knowledge, skills and resources; (3) increasing confidence; (4) influencing priorities and decisions; (5) enabling additional opportunities; (6) promoting culture change; and, (7) coping with experiences of living with chronic pain. This research shows us the impact that engaging patient partners can have on a national research network, and the areas where greater focus could, perhaps, lead to even greater impacts in future networks.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
The Chronic Pain Network (CPN) is one of a group of research networks that was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) to support patient-oriented research in chronic diseases. From the beginning of its work, the CPN has included patients as partners. Patient partners are co-chairs of all Network governance committees, funded projects are required to include patient partners in their work and there is a committee dedicated to engagement, the Patient Engagement (PE) committee. The PE Committee determined that it was important to evaluate how the CPN was engaging with patient partners and collaborated with the Public and Patient Engagement Collaborative (PPEC) to evaluate this work. The PPEC, along with members of the PE Committee, identified understanding the impact of patient engagement as an important part of the evaluation. This paper provides a description of the impacts of patient engagement on the people who were involved in the CPN, on the CPN’s work and way of being, and on the broader pain research community. Based on the results from three sets of interviews and review of Network documents, we share impacts identified in seven areas: (1) building community; (2) developing knowledge, skills and resources; (3) increasing confidence; (4) influencing priorities and decisions; (5) enabling additional opportunities; (6) promoting culture change; and, (7) coping with experiences of living with chronic pain. This research shows us the impact that engaging patient partners can have on a national research network, and the areas where greater focus could, perhaps, lead to even greater impacts in future networks.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37649098
doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00491-w
pii: 10.1186/s40900-023-00491-w
pmc: PMC10466858
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

73

Informations de copyright

© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Références

Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):905-918
pubmed: 36704935
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jan;27(1):17-31
pubmed: 28500572
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40
pubmed: 10940958
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Sep 13;11:1573-1583
pubmed: 28979105
Can J Pain. 2018 Jul 19;2(1):191-204
pubmed: 35005379
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 8;9(1):7
pubmed: 36890591
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):1132-1143
pubmed: 31373754
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1255-1265
pubmed: 36942646
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jul 2;6:38
pubmed: 32637153
CMAJ Open. 2019 Nov 07;7(4):E654-E664
pubmed: 31699686
Health Expect. 2016 Aug;19(4):817-27
pubmed: 26113295
Res Nurs Health. 2010 Feb;33(1):77-84
pubmed: 20014004
Can J Pain. 2022 Oct 19;6(1):185-194
pubmed: 36278248
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jan 25;21(1):12
pubmed: 36698200
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1:S22-S26
pubmed: 30074947
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970

Auteurs

Laura Tripp (L)

Public and Patient Engagement Collaborative, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. lauratripp@mcmaster.ca.

Dawn P Richards (DP)

Chronic Pain Network, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Five02 Labs Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Jennifer Daly-Cyr (J)

Chronic Pain Network, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Therese Lane (T)

Chronic Pain Network, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Delane Linkiewich (D)

Chronic Pain Network, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Kimberly N Begley (KN)

Chronic Pain Network, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Norman Buckley (N)

Chronic Pain Network, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Maria Hudspith (M)

Chronic Pain Network, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Pain BC, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Patricia Poulin (P)

The Ottawa Hospital Pain Clinic, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Julia Abelson (J)

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Classifications MeSH