Use of digital tools for preclinical training in complete denture: A pilot study.

CAD-CAM complete denture curriculum digital dentistry digital learning preclinical simulation undergraduate

Journal

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe
ISSN: 1600-0579
Titre abrégé: Eur J Dent Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9712132

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Aug 2023
Historique:
revised: 26 07 2023
received: 30 03 2023
accepted: 07 08 2023
medline: 31 8 2023
pubmed: 31 8 2023
entrez: 31 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Advances in CAD-CAM complete dentures open up opportunities in preclinical laboratory education. A cross-over study was conducted to assess the benefit of digital training in custom tray fabrication. Hypotheses were that digital training improved conceptual skill acquisition and that assessment of digital work helps in the discrimination of students' difficulty. Third-year students were allocated either into group A and took the manual practical classes before the digital ones, or into group B (N = 154). Prior to the sessions, a motor skill test was conducted. The influence on the learning process was evaluated by comparing the groups' results to the manual lab work with a Student's t-test. The effectiveness of the assessment in discriminating manual aptitude and conceptual skill was studied through Spearman's rank coefficient between digital and manual scores in conceptual skill and with a subgroup analysis according to the results of the motor skill test. The level of significance was set up at .05. Students' satisfaction was also assessed with a questionnaire. Students in group B achieved better scores. Spearman's rank coefficient test showed a weak correlation, R = .16. For manual lab work, the most manually skilled students did significantly better. In contrast, for the digital session, the medium manually skilled students did better. More than half of the students (55%) found the manual and digital sessions complementary, without identifying any difference depending on the learning sequence. Digital training improved the students' results in the conventional practical exercise. Assessments of the digital and conventional custom trays were complementary in order to distinguish conceptual and motor skills.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37649263
doi: 10.1111/eje.12948
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Université Paris Cité

Informations de copyright

© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Wulfman C, Bonnet G, Carayon D, et al. Digital removable complete dentures: a narrative review. FJDM. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.36161/FJDM.0005.
Fernandez MA, Nimmo A, Behar-Horenstein LS. Digital denture fabrication in pre- and postdoctoral education: a survey of U.S. dental schools. J Prosthodont. 2016;25:83-90.
Kattadiyil MT, Jekki R, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ. Comparison of treatment outcomes in digital and conventional complete removable dental prosthesis fabrications in a predoctoral setting. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114:818-825.
Bidra AS, Taylor TD, Agar JR. Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109:361-366.
Goodacre CJ, Goodacre BJ, Baba NZ. Should digital complete dentures be part of a contemporary prosthodontic education? J Prosthodont. 2021;30(S2):163-169.
Douglas RD, Hopp CD, Augustin MA. Dental students' preferences and performance in crown design: conventional wax-added versus CAD. J Dent Educ. 2014;78:1663-1672.
Schlenz MA, Michel K, Wegner K, Schmidt A, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. Undergraduate dental students' perspective on the implementation of digital dentistry in the preclinical curriculum: a questionnaire survey. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20:78.
Nagy ZA, Simon B, Tóth Z, Vág J. Evaluating the efficiency of the Dental Teacher system as a digital preclinical teaching tool. Eur J Dent Educ. 2018;22:e619-e623.
Zitzmann NU, Matthisson L, Ohla H, Joda T. Digital undergraduate education in dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:E3269.
Goodacre CJ. Digital learning resources for prosthodontic education: the perspectives of a long-term dental educator regarding 4 key factors. J Prosthodont. 2018;27:791-797.
Chiang H, Staffen A, Abdulmajeed AA, Janus C, Bencharit S. Effectiveness of CAD/CAM technology: a self-assessment tool for preclinical waxing exercise. Eur J Dent Educ. 2021;25:50-55.
Hamil LM, Mennito AS, Renné WG, Vuthiganon J. Dental students' opinions of preparation assessment with E4D compare software versus traditional methods. J Dent Educ. 2014;78:1424-1431.
Lee C, Kobayashi H, Lee SR, Ohyama H. The role of digital 3D scanned models in dental students' self-assessments in preclinical operative dentistry. J Dent Educ. 2018;82:399-405.
Miyazono S, Shinozaki Y, Sato H, Isshi K, Yamashita J. Use of digital technology to improve objective and reliable assessment in dental student simulation laboratories. J Dent Educ. 2019;83:1224-1232.
Wolgin M, Grabowski S, Elhadad S, Frank W, Kielbassa AM. Comparison of a prepCheck-supported self-assessment concept with conventional faculty supervision in a pre-clinical simulation environment. Eur J Dent Educ. 2018;22:e522-e529.
Gratton DG, Kwon SR, Blanchette DR, Aquilino SA. Performance of two different digital evaluation systems used for assessing pre-clinical dental students' prosthodontic technical skills. Eur J Dent Educ. 2017;21:252-260.
Mahrous A, Schneider GB, Holloway JA, Dawson DV. Enhancing student learning in removable partial denture design by using virtual three-dimensional models versus traditional two-dimensional drawings: a comparative study. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:927-933.
Schwindling FS, Deisenhofer UK, Porsche M, Rammelsberg P, Kappel S, Stober T. Establishing CAD/CAM in preclinical dental education: evaluation of a hands-on module. J Dent Educ. 2015;79:1215-1221.
Khalaf K, El-Kishawi M, Mustafa S, Al KS. Effectiveness of technology-enhanced teaching and assessment methods of undergraduate preclinical dental skills: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:286.
Gali S. Peer-assisted online teaching and painting apps in preclinical complete denture prosthodontics during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Dent Educ. 2020;85:1180-1183.
Tuil N, Lescaille G, Jordan L, Berteretche MV, Braud A. Implementation of game-based training in oral rehabilitation of edentulous patients in an undergraduate dental course. J Dent Educ. 2022;87:364-373.
Bak SY, Saglik B, Inglehart MR. Introducing dental students to complete denture treatment in times of COVID-19: Students' responses. J Dent Educ. 2022;87:313-325.
Li X, Li Y, Li X, Chen X, Yang G, Yang L. Comparison of case-based learning combined with Rain Classroom teaching and traditional method in complete denture course for undergraduate interns. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22:610.
Turkyilmaz I, Wilkins GN, Skiba WF. Transformation of preclinical education with a digital platform using progressive learning modules on denture teeth arrangement. Prim Dent J. 2022;11:25-27.
Callan RS, Haywood VB, Cooper JR, Furness AR, Looney SW. The validity of using E4D Compare's “% Comparison” to assess crown preparations in preclinical dental education. J Dent Educ. 2015;79:1445-1451.
Cleghorn BM, Brillant M, Kraglund F, Seth S, Garland HW, Kraglund F. Value of the manual dexterity test as a screening tool for dental school admissions. J Dent Educ. 2018;82:878-882.
Novack R, Turgeon DP. Investigating Dental Aptitude Test (DAT) results as predictors for preclinical and clinical scores in dental school. J Dent Educ. 2020;84:1254-1261.
Hegarty M, Keehner M, Khooshabeh P, Montello DR. How spatial abilities enhance, and are enhanced by, dental education. Learn Individ Differ. 2009;19:61-70.
Deek J, Albright DA, John V, Tang Q, Stewart KT. Correlation between advanced dental adminission test performance and dental MATCH success. J Dent Educ. 2021;85:463-475.
Caroll AM, Schuster GM. Correlation between student's Dental Admission Test scores and performance on a dental school's competency exam. J Dent Educ. 2015;70:1325-1329.
Rowland KC, Rieken S. Rethinking dental school admission criteria: correlation between pre-admission variables and first-year performance for six classes at one dental school. J Dent Educ. 2018;82:411-416.
Christersson C, Bengmark D, Bengtsson H, Lindh C, Rohlin M. A predictive model for alternative admission to dental education. J Dent Educ. 2015;19:251-258.

Auteurs

Audrey Porcherot (A)

Faculty of Health, UFR Dentistry, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Department of Odontology, AP-HP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France.

Imane Maniani (I)

Faculty of Health, UFR Dentistry, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Marie-Violaine Berteretche (MV)

Faculty of Health, UFR Dentistry, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Department of Odontology, AP-HP, Rothschild Hospital, Paris, France.

Hélène Citterio (H)

Faculty of Health, UFR Dentistry, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Department of Odontology, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.

Olivier Fromentin (O)

Faculty of Health, UFR Dentistry, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Department of Odontology, AP-HP, Rothschild Hospital, Paris, France.

Christophe Rignon-Bret (C)

Faculty of Health, UFR Dentistry, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Department of Odontology, AP-HP, Charles Foix Hospital, Ivry sur Seine, France.

Adeline Braud (A)

Faculty of Health, UFR Dentistry, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Department of Odontology, AP-HP, Rothschild Hospital, Paris, France.

Claudine Wulfman (C)

Faculty of Health, UFR Dentistry, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Department of Odontology, AP-HP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France.

Classifications MeSH