Cryoanesthesia with ethyl chloride spray versus 5% lidocaine gel in alleviating oral local anesthetic injection pain for buccal anaesthesia: A randomized clinical (controlled) trial.
Cryoanesthesia
Dental anxiety
Ethyl chloride
Needle phobia
Topical lidocaine
Journal
Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects
ISSN: 2008-210X
Titre abrégé: J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101576035
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
05
12
2022
accepted:
09
01
2023
medline:
31
8
2023
pubmed:
31
8
2023
entrez:
31
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Numbing the area of oral mucosa with cold application prior to administration of regional anesthesia has been widely used by various dentists in alleviating pain caused by needle prick. Cryoanesthesia using Endo-ice as topical anesthesia has been studied as a replacement to prevail the fallibility of topical anaesthetics. This study aimed to evaluate and compare effectiveness of ethyl chloride spray with 5% lidocaine gel in alleviating buccal anesthesia injection pain. Total of 90 outpatients were randomly divided into 3 groups as follows: Group 1 - cryotherapy with ethyl chloride at the anesthetic site preceding before administration of local anesthesia; Group 2 - topical application of 5% LIDOCAINE GEL preceding before administration of local anesthesia; and group 3 - control that did not receive any topical agent preceding before administration of local anesthesia. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to document pain immediately after injection prick. About comparison of pain scores, significant difference was found between group 1 (ethyl chloride) and group 2 (topical lidocaine) patients ( Importance of alleviating fear of needle injection phobia amongst patients is of paramount importance. Ethyl chloride was found to be more effective than topical lidocaine in alleviating needle injection pain before administration of local anesthetic injection.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Numbing the area of oral mucosa with cold application prior to administration of regional anesthesia has been widely used by various dentists in alleviating pain caused by needle prick. Cryoanesthesia using Endo-ice as topical anesthesia has been studied as a replacement to prevail the fallibility of topical anaesthetics. This study aimed to evaluate and compare effectiveness of ethyl chloride spray with 5% lidocaine gel in alleviating buccal anesthesia injection pain.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Total of 90 outpatients were randomly divided into 3 groups as follows: Group 1 - cryotherapy with ethyl chloride at the anesthetic site preceding before administration of local anesthesia; Group 2 - topical application of 5% LIDOCAINE GEL preceding before administration of local anesthesia; and group 3 - control that did not receive any topical agent preceding before administration of local anesthesia. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to document pain immediately after injection prick.
Results
UNASSIGNED
About comparison of pain scores, significant difference was found between group 1 (ethyl chloride) and group 2 (topical lidocaine) patients (
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Importance of alleviating fear of needle injection phobia amongst patients is of paramount importance. Ethyl chloride was found to be more effective than topical lidocaine in alleviating needle injection pain before administration of local anesthetic injection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37650023
doi: 10.34172/joddd.2023.37041
pmc: PMC10462915
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
40-46Informations de copyright
©2023 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare there are no conflict of interest.
Références
Biomed Res Int. 2021 May 23;2021:1119710
pubmed: 34124238
Anesth Prog. 2016 Summer;63(2):55-61
pubmed: 27269661
Eur J Oral Sci. 2016 Dec;124(6):572-579
pubmed: 27689943
Anesth Prog. 2015 Fall;62(3):106-9
pubmed: 26398126
CMAJ. 2012 Dec 11;184(18):2016
pubmed: 22546890
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2018 Jul-Sep;36(3):296-300
pubmed: 30246753
Anesth Prog. 2003;50(4):159-63
pubmed: 14959903
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2020 Apr-Jun;38(2):184-189
pubmed: 32611866
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Dec;16(4):237-244
pubmed: 28879311
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Dec;20(6):377-386
pubmed: 33409366
Singapore Dent J. 2017 Dec;38:17-19
pubmed: 29229069
Br Dent J. 2008 Sep 13;205(5):E10; discussion 258-9
pubmed: 18791585
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Feb;34(3):339-345
pubmed: 30983457
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015 Oct-Dec;33(4):285-90
pubmed: 26381629
Anesth Prog. 2005 Fall;52(3):95-101
pubmed: 16252739
Aust Dent J. 2006 Mar;51(1):2-5
pubmed: 16669469
Anesth Prog. 2005 Summer;52(2):50-5
pubmed: 16048151
J Rheumatol. 1990 Aug;17(8):1022-4
pubmed: 2213777
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Apr;18(2):79-88
pubmed: 29744382
Dermatol Surg. 2001 May;27(5):495-6
pubmed: 11359502
Dent Clin North Am. 2010 Oct;54(4):731-44
pubmed: 20831935
Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Jan-Apr;10(1):13-6
pubmed: 26957683
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Jan-Feb;14(1):81-83
pubmed: 34326589
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013 Nov;10(6):790-4
pubmed: 24379869
J Fam Pract. 1995 Aug;41(2):169-75
pubmed: 7636457