Health-related quality of life trajectories in critical illness: Protocol for a Monte Carlo simulation study.

Monte Carlo simulation critical care intensive care unit quality of life randomised controlled trials

Journal

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
ISSN: 1399-6576
Titre abrégé: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370270

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 02 08 2023
accepted: 12 08 2023
medline: 31 8 2023
pubmed: 31 8 2023
entrez: 31 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a patient-centred outcome increasingly used as a secondary outcome in critical care research. It may cover several important dimensions of clinical status in intensive care unit (ICU) patients that arguably elude other more easily quantified outcomes such as mortality. Poor associations with harder outcomes, conflicting data on HRQoL in critically ill compared to the background population, and paradoxical effects on HRQoL and mortality complicate the current operationalisation in critical care trials. This protocol outlines a simulation study that will gauge if the areas under the HRQoL trajectories could be a viable alternative. We will gauge the behaviour of the proposed HRQoL operationalisation through Monte Carlo simulations, under clinical scenarios that reflect a broad critical care population eligible for inclusion in a large pragmatic trial. We will simulate 15,360 clinical scenarios based on a full factorial design with the following seven simulation parameters: number of patients per arm, relative mortality reduction in the interventional arm, acceleration of HRQoL improvement in the interventional arm, the relative improvement in final HRQoL in the interventional arm, dampening effect of mortality on HRQoL values at discharge from the ICU, proportion of so-called mortality benefiters in the interventional arm and mortality trajectory shape. For each clinical scenario, we will simulate 100,000 two-arm trials with 1:1 randomisation. HRQoL will be sampled fortnightly after ICU discharge. Outcomes will include HRQoL in survivors and all patients at the end of follow-up; mean areas under the HRQoL trajectories in both arms; and mean difference between areas under the HRQoL trajectories and single-sampled HRQoLs at the end of follow-up. In the outlined simulation study, we aim to assess whether the area under the HRQoL trajectory curve could be a candidate for reconciling the seemingly paradoxical effects on improved mortality and reduced HRQoL while remaining sensitive to early or accelerated improvement in patient outcomes. The resultant insights will inform subsequent methodological work on prudent collection and statistical analysis of such data from real critically ill patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a patient-centred outcome increasingly used as a secondary outcome in critical care research. It may cover several important dimensions of clinical status in intensive care unit (ICU) patients that arguably elude other more easily quantified outcomes such as mortality. Poor associations with harder outcomes, conflicting data on HRQoL in critically ill compared to the background population, and paradoxical effects on HRQoL and mortality complicate the current operationalisation in critical care trials. This protocol outlines a simulation study that will gauge if the areas under the HRQoL trajectories could be a viable alternative.
METHODS METHODS
We will gauge the behaviour of the proposed HRQoL operationalisation through Monte Carlo simulations, under clinical scenarios that reflect a broad critical care population eligible for inclusion in a large pragmatic trial. We will simulate 15,360 clinical scenarios based on a full factorial design with the following seven simulation parameters: number of patients per arm, relative mortality reduction in the interventional arm, acceleration of HRQoL improvement in the interventional arm, the relative improvement in final HRQoL in the interventional arm, dampening effect of mortality on HRQoL values at discharge from the ICU, proportion of so-called mortality benefiters in the interventional arm and mortality trajectory shape. For each clinical scenario, we will simulate 100,000 two-arm trials with 1:1 randomisation. HRQoL will be sampled fortnightly after ICU discharge. Outcomes will include HRQoL in survivors and all patients at the end of follow-up; mean areas under the HRQoL trajectories in both arms; and mean difference between areas under the HRQoL trajectories and single-sampled HRQoLs at the end of follow-up.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
In the outlined simulation study, we aim to assess whether the area under the HRQoL trajectory curve could be a candidate for reconciling the seemingly paradoxical effects on improved mortality and reduced HRQoL while remaining sensitive to early or accelerated improvement in patient outcomes. The resultant insights will inform subsequent methodological work on prudent collection and statistical analysis of such data from real critically ill patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37650374
doi: 10.1111/aas.14324
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Novo Nordisk Foundation
Organisme : Sygeforsikringen "danmark"

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.

Références

Cuthbertson BH, Rattray J, Campbell MK, et al. The PRaCTICaL study of nurse led, intensive care follow-up programmes for improving long term outcomes from critical illness: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;339:b3723. doi:10.1136/bmj.b3723
Granholm A, Anthon CT, Kjaer MN, et al. Patient-important outcomes other than mortality in contemporary ICU trials: a scoping review. Crit Care Med. 2022;50:e759-e771. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000005637
Needham DM, Sepulveda KA, Dinglas VD, et al. Core outcome measures for clinical research in acute respiratory failure survivors. An international modified Delphi consensus study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(9):1122-1130. doi:10.1164/rccm.201702-0372OC
Kjaer MN, Granholm A, Vesterlund GK, et al. Development of a core outcome set for general intensive care unit patients-a protocol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022;66(3):415-424. doi:10.1111/aas.14024
Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727-1736. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x
Kjaer MN, Madsen MB, Meier N, et al. Non-response for health-related quality of life outcomes in ICU patients: a systematic review of the reporting in randomised trials. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023;67:842-852. doi:10.1111/aas.14250
COVID STEROID 2 Trial Group. Effect of 12 mg vs 6 mg of dexamethasone on the number of days alive without life support in adults with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia: the COVID STEROID 2 randomized trial. JAMA. 2021;326(18):1807-1817. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.18295
Schjørring OL, Klitgaard TL, Perner A, et al. Lower or higher oxygenation targets for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(14):1301-1311. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2032510
Granholm A, Schjørring OL, Jensen AKG, et al. Association between days alive without life support/out of hospital and health-related quality of life. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023;67:762-771. doi:10.1111/aas.14231
Hofhuis J, Spronk P, van Stel H, Schrijvers G, Rommes J, Bakker J. The impact of critical illness on perceived health-related quality of life during ICU treatment, hospital stay, and after hospital discharge-a long-term follow-up study. Chest. 2008;133(2):377-385. doi:10.1378/chest.07-1217
Orwelius L, Fredrikson M, Kristenson M, Walther S, Sjöberg F. Health-related quality of life scores after intensive care are almost equal to those of the normal population: a multicenter observational study. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R236. doi:10.1186/cc13059
Cuthbertson BH, Scott J, Strachan M, Kilonzo M, Vale L. Quality of life before and after intensive care. Anaesthesia. 2005;60(4):332-339. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.04109.x
Cuthbertson BH, Roughton S, Jenkinson D, MacLennan G, Vale L. Quality of life in the five years after intensive care: a cohort study. Crit Care. 2010;14(1):R6. doi:10.1186/cc8848
Pallanch O, Ortalda A, Pelosi P, et al. Effects on health-related quality of life of interventions affecting survival in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2022;26(1):126. doi:10.1186/s13054-022-03993-3
Colantuoni E, Scharfstein DO, Wang C, et al. Statistical methods to compare functional outcomes in randomized controlled trials with high mortality. BMJ. 2018;360:j5748. doi:10.1136/bmj.j5748
Morris TP, White IR, Crowther MJ. Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods. Stat Med. 2019;38(11):2074-2102. doi:10.1002/sim.8086
Granholm A, Lange T, Harhay MO, Perner A, Moller MH, Kaas-Hansen BS. Effects of duration of follow-up and lag in data collection on the performance of adaptive clinical trials. OSF. 2023.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials of Drugs and Biologics Guidance (Technical report). US Food and Drug Administration. 2019.
Jensen CE, Sørensen SS, Gudex C, Jensen MB, Pedersen KM, Ehlers LH. The Danish EQ-5D-5L value set: a hybrid model using cTTO and DCE data. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021;19(4):579-591. doi:10.1007/s40258-021-00639-3
Yuksel C, Schaefer S, Keyser J. On the parameterization of Catmull-Rom curves. Paper presented at: 2009 SIAM/ACM Joint Conference on Geometric and Physical Modeling. 2009.
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473-483.
Kjaer MN, Meyhoff TS, Madsen MB, et al. Long-term patient-important outcomes after septic shock: a protocol for 1-year follow-up of the CLASSIC trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020;64(3):410-416. doi:10.1111/aas.13519
Kjaer MN, Meyhoff TS, Sivapalan P, et al. Long-term effects of restriction of intravenous fluid in adult ICU patients with septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2023;49:820-830.
Bissett BM, Leditschke IA, Neeman T, et al. Does mechanical threshold inspiratory muscle training promote recovery and improve outcomes in patients who are ventilator-dependent in the intensive care unit? The IMPROVE randomised trial. Aust Crit Care. 2023;36:613-621. doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2022.07.002
Campos DR, Bueno TBC, Anjos JSGG, et al. Early neuromuscular electrical stimulation in addition to early mobilization improves functional status and decreases hospitalization days of critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2022;50(7):1116-1126. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000005557
Nickels MR, Aitken LM, Barnett AG, et al. Effect of in-bed cycling on acute muscle wasting in critically ill adults: a randomised clinical trial. J Crit Care. 2020;59:86-93. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.05.008
Pickkers P, Mehta RL, Murray PT, et al. Effect of human recombinant alkaline phosphatase on 7-day creatinine clearance in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320(19):1998-2009. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.14283
Ridley EJ, Davies AR, Parke R, et al. Supplemental parenteral nutrition versus usual care in critically ill adults: a pilot randomized controlled study. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):12. doi:10.1186/s13054-018-1939-7
Wright SE, Thomas K, Watson G, et al. Intensive versus standard physical rehabilitation therapy in the critically ill (EPICC): a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Thorax. 2018;73(3):213-221. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209858
Freeman-Sanderson AL, Togher L, Elkins MR, Phipps PR. Return of voice for ventilated tracheostomy patients in ICU. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(6):1075-1081. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000001610
Cuthbertson BH, Elders A, Hall S, et al. Mortality and quality of life in the five years after severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2013;17(2):R70. doi:10.1186/cc12616
Meyhoff TS, Hjortrup PB, Wetterslev J, et al. Restriction of intravenous fluid in ICU patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:2459-2470. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2202707
Rousseeuw PJ, Croux C. Alternatives to the median absolute deviation. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993;88(424):1273-1283. doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476408
Forster GM, Bihari S, Tiruvoipati R, Bailey M, Pilcher D. The association between discharge delay from intensive care and patient outcomes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(10):1399-1406. doi:10.1164/rccm.201912-2418OC
FDA. Enrichment Strategies for Clinical Trials to Support Determination of Effectiveness of Human Drugs and Biological Products: Guidance for Industry (Technical report). Federal Drug Administration. 2019 https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/enrichment-strategies-clinical-trials-support-approval-human-drugs-and-biological-products

Auteurs

Benjamin Skov Kaas-Hansen (BS)

Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Section of Biostatistics, Deparment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Maj-Brit Nørregaard Kjaer (MN)

Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Morten Hylander Møller (MH)

Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Aksel Karl Georg Jensen (AKG)

Section of Biostatistics, Deparment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Mia Esta Larsen (ME)

Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Brian H Cuthbertson (BH)

Department of Critical Care, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.

Anders Perner (A)

Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Anders Granholm (A)

Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH