Development and validation of a graduated compression stockings adherence scale.

Chronic venous disease adherence graduated compression stockings reliability scale validity

Journal

Phlebology
ISSN: 1758-1125
Titre abrégé: Phlebology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9012921

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 31 8 2023
medline: 31 8 2023
entrez: 31 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Compression therapy with the use of graduated compression stockings (GCSs) is a common treatment strategy for chronic venous disease (CVD). However, there is no uniform and objective standard to assess adherence to the use of GCSs. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a GCS Compliance Scale (GCSAS) to fill gaps in internationally recognized comprehensive scales and provide a useful tool for future research. The items included in the GCSAS were based on a review of the literature and open-ended interviews with experts, who screened the initial items using an item-level content validity index. Then, pilot tests were conducted three times with 50 participants. After exclusion of redundant and cross-loading items by exploratory factor analysis, 290 subjects were recruited to evaluate the reliability and validity of the proposed GCSAS. Analyses included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, split-half reliability, construct validity, criterion validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. The final GCSAS consisted of 17 items and 5 dimensions. The results of the exploratory factor analysis indicated that the variances of each factor explained were 22.03%, 14.85%, 14.74%, 14.16%, and 13.35%, and all 5 factors explained 79.13% of the variance among the 17 items. The factor loadings of all items were >0.7. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the indices were adequate. A significant positive correlation was found between the GCSAS and the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study - Quality of Life questionnaire scores (r = 0.76, The GCSAS showed good validity and reliability to assess compliance with the use of GCSs among patients with CVD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37651292
doi: 10.1177/02683555231200109
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

605-612

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Wen-Tao Yang (WT)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Hua-Liang Ren (HL)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Kai Zheng (K)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Zhen-Yi Jin (ZY)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Jia-Hao Wen (JH)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Sheng-Xing Wang (SX)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Wang-De Zhang (WD)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Chun-Min Li (CM)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Classifications MeSH