Preliminary results on validity and reliability from two prospective cohort studies on a new Neonatal Coma Score.
intensive care units, neonatal
neonatology
neurology
nursing care
Journal
Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition
ISSN: 1468-2052
Titre abrégé: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9501297
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Aug 2023
31 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
29
04
2023
accepted:
21
08
2023
medline:
1
9
2023
pubmed:
1
9
2023
entrez:
31
8
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To collect data on content/face validity and interobserver agreement for a Neonatal Coma Score (NCS) in well full-term neonates and on construct validity in unwell and preterm babies, specifically how the NCS changed with gestational age and illness. Prospective cohort studies. Two UK tertiary neonatal units (Sheffield and Leeds). 151 well full-term (≥37 weeks gestational age) newborn babies recruited between January and February 2020 in Sheffield and April and May 2021 in Leeds; 101 sick preterm and full-term babies admitted to Sheffield neonatal unit between January 2021 and May 2022. A new NCS. Determination of normal values in well babies born ≥37 weeks gestational age; data on how the NCS changes with gestational age and illness. Face validity was demonstrated during development of the NCS. The median NCS of well, full-term newborn babies was 15 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.78 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.84). In the 'well' preterm population, 95% <28 weeks had a score ≥11; 28-31 weeks ≥11; 32-36 weeks ≥13 and 37-44 weeks 14-15. The NCS dropped during periods of deterioration, demonstrating evidence of construct validity. Criterion validity was not assessed. The NCS has good intraobserver agreement in well full-term babies, with a normal NCS 14-15. The NCS in preterm neonates depended on gestational age, and deterioration from baseline was associated with illness. Further work is needed to determine normal scores each gestational age, reliability at lower levels, how early the NCS identifies deterioration and comparison with other assessment tools to demonstrate criterion validity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37652673
pii: archdischild-2023-325765
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325765
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.