The effects of paroxetine therapy on depressive symptom and motor function in the treatment of depression with Parkinson's disease: A meta-analysis.


Journal

Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Aug 2023
Historique:
medline: 4 9 2023
pubmed: 1 9 2023
entrez: 1 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Paroxetine therapy has been used for treatment of patients with depression and Parkinson's disease (dPD) in many clinical studies, but, the effects of paroxetine in dPD patients are not completely understood. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the effects of paroxetine therapy on depressive symptom and motor function in the treatment of dPD, in order to confer a reference for clinical practice. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of paroxetine for dPD published up to October, 2022 were retrieved. Standardised mean difference (SMD), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and heterogeneity was measured with the I2 test. The outcomes of interest were as follows: the efficacy, Hamilton depression rating scale score, unified Parkinson's disease rating scale score, Hamilton anxiety rating scale score or adverse events. Thirty-four RCTs with 2819 participants were included. Compared with control group, the pooled effects of paroxetine therapy on depression were (22 trials; OR 3.62, 95% CI 2.63 to 4.98, P < .00001) for antidepressant response (25 trials; SMD -2.14, 95% CI -2.73 to -1.56, P < .00001) for Hamilton depression rating scale score, the pooled effects of paroxetine therapy on motor function were (10 trials; OR 4.63, 95% CI 3.15 to 6.79, P < .00001) for anti-PD efficacy (18 trials; SMD -2.02, 95% CI -2.48 to -1.55, P < .00001) for total unified Parkinson's disease rating scale score. The Hamilton anxiety rating scale score showed significant decrease in the paroxetine treatment group compared to control group (10 trials; SMD -1.93, 95% CI -2.65 to -1.22, P < .00001). In addition, paroxetine therapy reduced the number of any adverse events obviously in dPD patients (twenty trials; OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.57, P < .00001). Paroxetine therapy has clinical benefits for improvement of depressive symptom and motor function in dPD patients, moreover, it is of high drug safety. Further well-designed, multi-center RCTs needed to identify these findings.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Paroxetine therapy has been used for treatment of patients with depression and Parkinson's disease (dPD) in many clinical studies, but, the effects of paroxetine in dPD patients are not completely understood. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the effects of paroxetine therapy on depressive symptom and motor function in the treatment of dPD, in order to confer a reference for clinical practice.
METHODS METHODS
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of paroxetine for dPD published up to October, 2022 were retrieved. Standardised mean difference (SMD), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and heterogeneity was measured with the I2 test. The outcomes of interest were as follows: the efficacy, Hamilton depression rating scale score, unified Parkinson's disease rating scale score, Hamilton anxiety rating scale score or adverse events.
RESULTS RESULTS
Thirty-four RCTs with 2819 participants were included. Compared with control group, the pooled effects of paroxetine therapy on depression were (22 trials; OR 3.62, 95% CI 2.63 to 4.98, P < .00001) for antidepressant response (25 trials; SMD -2.14, 95% CI -2.73 to -1.56, P < .00001) for Hamilton depression rating scale score, the pooled effects of paroxetine therapy on motor function were (10 trials; OR 4.63, 95% CI 3.15 to 6.79, P < .00001) for anti-PD efficacy (18 trials; SMD -2.02, 95% CI -2.48 to -1.55, P < .00001) for total unified Parkinson's disease rating scale score. The Hamilton anxiety rating scale score showed significant decrease in the paroxetine treatment group compared to control group (10 trials; SMD -1.93, 95% CI -2.65 to -1.22, P < .00001). In addition, paroxetine therapy reduced the number of any adverse events obviously in dPD patients (twenty trials; OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.57, P < .00001).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Paroxetine therapy has clinical benefits for improvement of depressive symptom and motor function in dPD patients, moreover, it is of high drug safety. Further well-designed, multi-center RCTs needed to identify these findings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37653795
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034687
pii: 00005792-202308250-00067
pmc: PMC10470685
doi:

Substances chimiques

Paroxetine 41VRH5220H

Types de publication

Meta-Analysis Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e34687

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Références

Neurology. 2012 Apr 17;78(16):1229-36
pubmed: 22496199
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
pubmed: 12111919
Neurology. 2000 Oct 24;55(8):1216-8
pubmed: 11071504
Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30
pubmed: 21603045
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2017 Jun 01;4(4):470-477
pubmed: 30363415
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2022 Dec;129(12):1397-1418
pubmed: 36322206
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2020;18(4):277-287
pubmed: 31622207
Drugs Aging. 2022 Jun;39(6):417-439
pubmed: 35705848
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010 Spring;22(2):188-95
pubmed: 20463113
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Dec 15;43(18):5658-5680
pubmed: 35855597
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928
pubmed: 22008217
BMC Neurol. 2010 Jun 21;10:49
pubmed: 20565960
Asian J Psychiatr. 2021 Jul;61:102691
pubmed: 33992852
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;29(6):530-540
pubmed: 33648830
Mov Disord. 2000 Sep;15(5):986-9
pubmed: 11009210
Neurology. 2009 Mar 10;72(10):886-92
pubmed: 19092112
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016 Feb;23:80-5
pubmed: 26739248

Auteurs

Li-Lin Jiang (LL)

Department of Biology and Pharmacy, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources Chemistry and Biotechnology, Yulin Normal University, Yulin, China.

Yu-Lin Wu (YL)

Department of Biology and Pharmacy, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources Chemistry and Biotechnology, Yulin Normal University, Yulin, China.

Ye Mo (Y)

Department of Biology and Pharmacy, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources Chemistry and Biotechnology, Yulin Normal University, Yulin, China.

Ling Gou (L)

Department of Biology and Pharmacy, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources Chemistry and Biotechnology, Yulin Normal University, Yulin, China.

Mei-Ling Chen (ML)

Department of Biology and Pharmacy, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources Chemistry and Biotechnology, Yulin Normal University, Yulin, China.

Yan Wang (Y)

Department of Pharmacy, Guangdong Province Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Foshan, China.

Qing-Min Zang (QM)

Department of Biology and Pharmacy, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources Chemistry and Biotechnology, Yulin Normal University, Yulin, China.

De-Qi Jiang (DQ)

Department of Biology and Pharmacy, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources Chemistry and Biotechnology, Yulin Normal University, Yulin, China.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH