Quality assessment of routine brain imaging at 0.55 T: initial experience in a clinical workflow.
0.55 T MRI
accessible MRI
brain MRI
low-cost MRI
low-field MRI
Journal
NMR in biomedicine
ISSN: 1099-1492
Titre abrégé: NMR Biomed
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8915233
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Aug 2023
31 Aug 2023
Historique:
revised:
20
06
2023
received:
05
01
2023
accepted:
16
07
2023
medline:
1
9
2023
pubmed:
1
9
2023
entrez:
1
9
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of clinical brain imaging in healthy subjects and patients on an FDA-approved commercial 0.55 T MRI scanner, and to provide information about the feasibility of using this scanner in a clinical workflow. In this IRB-approved study, brain examinations on the scanner were prospectively performed in 10 healthy subjects (February-April 2022) and retrospectively derived from 44 patients (February-July 2022). Images collected using the following pulse sequences were available for assessment: axial DWI (diffusion-weighted imaging), apparent diffusion coefficient maps, 2D axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images, axial susceptibility-weighted images (both magnitude and phase), sagittal T
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e5017Subventions
Organisme : Siemens Healthineers
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Ai T, Morelli JN, Hu X, et al. A historical overview of magnetic resonance imaging, focusing on technological innovations. Invest Radiol. 2012;47(12):725-741. doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e318272d29f
Duyn JH. The future of ultra-high field MRI and fMRI for study of the human brain. Neuroimage. 2012;62(2):1241-1248. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.065
Ladd ME, Bachert P, Meyerspeer M, et al. Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2018;109:1-50. doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2018.06.001
Edelstein WA, Glover GH, Hardy CJ, Redington RW. The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1986;3(4):604-618. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910030413
Sarracanie M, Salameh N. Low-field MRI: how low can we go? A fresh view on an old debate. Front Phys Ther. 2020;8:172. doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00172
Arnold TC, Freeman CW, Litt B, Stein JM. Low-field MRI: clinical promise and challenges. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022;57(1):25-44. doi:10.1002/jmri.28408
Marques JP, Simonis FFJ, Webb AG. Low-field MRI: an MR physics perspective. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49(6):1528-1542. doi:10.1002/jmri.26637
Khodarahmi I, Bonham LW, Weiss CR, Fritz J. Needle heating during interventional magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5- and 3.0-T field strengths. Invest Radiol. 2020;55(6):396-404. doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000649
Basar B, Sonmez M, Yildirim DK, et al. Susceptibility artifacts from metallic markers and cardiac catheterization devices on a high-performance 0.55 T MRI system. Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;77:14-20. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2020.12.002
Campbell-Washburn AE, Ramasawmy R, Restivo MC, et al. Opportunities in interventional and diagnostic imaging by using high-performance low-field-strength MRI. Radiology. 2019;293(2):384-393. doi:10.1148/radiol.2019190452
Runge VM, Heverhagen JT. Advocating the development of next-generation, advanced-design low-field magnetic resonance systems. Invest Radiol. 2020;55(12):747-753. doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000703
Campbell-Washburn AE, Jiang Y, Körzdörfer G, Nittka M, Griswold MA. Feasibility of MR fingerprinting using a high-performance 0.55 T MRI system. Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;81:88-93. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2021.06.002
Wang Y, Gelderen P, Zwart JA, Campbell-Washburn AE, Duyn JH. FMRI based on transition-band balanced SSFP in comparison with EPI on a high-performance 0.55 T scanner. Magn Reson Med. 2021;85(6):3196-3210. doi:10.1002/mrm.28657
Bhattacharya I, Ramasawmy R, Javed A, et al. Assessment of lung structure and regional function using 0.55 T MRI in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Invest Radiol. 2021;57(3):178-186. doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000832
Lévy S, Heiss R, Grimm R, et al. Free-breathing low-field MRI of the lungs detects functional alterations associated with persistent symptoms after COVID-19 infection. Invest Radiol. 2022;57(11):742-751. doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000892
Campbell-Washburn AE, Malayeri AA, Jones EC, et al. T2-weighted lung imaging using a 0.55-T MRI system. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2021;3(3):e200611. doi:10.1148/ryct.2021200611
Breit HC, Vosshenrich J, Rusche T, Bach M, Harder D. Improving the assessment of the postoperative spine with 0.55T MRI: a case report. MAGNETOM Flash. 2022;80:2-5.
Pogarell T, May MS, Nagel AM, Uder M, Heiss R. Muskuloskeletale Bildgebung in der Niederfeld-Magnetresonanztomographie. Radiologe. 2022;62(5):410-417. doi:10.1007/s00117-022-01000-y
Rusche T, Breit HC, Bach M, et al. Potential of stroke imaging using a new prototype of low-field MRI: a prospective direct 0.55 T/1.5 T scanner comparison. J Clin Med. 2022;11(10):2798. doi:10.3390/jcm11102798
Campbell-Washburn AE, Herzka DA, Kellman P, Koretsky AP, Balaban RS. Image contrast at 0.55T. Paper presented at: ISMRM 27th Annual Meeting & Exhibition; May 11-16, 2019; Montreal, Quebec, Canada. https://archive.ismrm.org/2019/1214.html
Restivo MC, Ramasawmy R, Bandettini WP, Herzka DA, Campbell-Washburn AE. Efficient spiral in-out and EPI balanced steady-state free precession cine imaging using a high-performance 0.55 T MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2020;84(5):2364-2375. doi:10.1002/mrm.28278