Assessment of the Peri-Implant Conditions for the Primary and the Repeated Abutment Placements: An Original Research.
Abutment replacement
dental implant
marginal bone resorption
peri-implant tissues
Journal
Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences
ISSN: 0976-4879
Titre abrégé: J Pharm Bioallied Sci
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101537209
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
03
10
2022
revised:
26
10
2022
accepted:
17
11
2022
medline:
1
9
2023
pubmed:
1
9
2023
entrez:
1
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recurrent abutment substitutions may physically irritate the mucosal (soft tissue) barrier, which may cause additional toxic irritants and germs to enter the mucosal implant barrier and weaken the tissues surrounding implant. The creation of a "definitive abutment" may lessen the likelihood of tissue losses around the implant. Determining the characters of the peri-implant tissue after the placement of the definitive abutments and multiple abutment replacement was the goal of this study. Forty missing teeth were replaced with implants in matched subjects. Parameters assessed were "distance of cement enamel junction to alveolar crest and distance of CEJ to gingival margin; bleeding on probing, Sulcus probing depth, and peri-implant marginal bone loss." Subjects were randomly assigned for the two groups of intervention. All the measurements were documented at designated timelines and compared for the statistical variance where In the control and test groups, the peri-implant marginal bone level rose from baseline to 3 months. There were no appreciable differences between the CEJ-AC and CEJ-GM groups when the clinical and radiographic parameters of each group were evaluated. Throughout all of the time points, the soft tissue borders in both groups remained comparably steady. The study's findings suggest that using implants with definite abutments is more advantageous for obtaining better maintenance in terms of the health of the tissues that surround the implants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37654361
doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_450_22
pii: JPBS-15-187
pmc: PMC10466608
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
S187-S191Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Nov;22(11):1303-7
pubmed: 21985288
Br Dent J. 2006 Jul 22;201(2):77-89
pubmed: 16865133
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994 Dec;5(4):191-201
pubmed: 7640332
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012 Spring;5(1):9-16
pubmed: 22518376
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(2):82-8
pubmed: 14536042
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986 Summer;1(1):11-25
pubmed: 3527955
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10(1):57-72
pubmed: 28327695
Acta Odontol Scand. 1964 Feb;22:121-35
pubmed: 14158464
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Dec;20(6):976-982
pubmed: 30307716
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Sep;26(9):983-91
pubmed: 24735458
Int J Oral Surg. 1981 Dec;10(6):387-416
pubmed: 6809663
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 May-Jun;28(3):807-14
pubmed: 23748313
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Dec;92(6):523-30
pubmed: 15583556
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991 Apr-Jun;2(2):81-90
pubmed: 1809403
J Clin Periodontol. 1999 Sep;26(9):600-7
pubmed: 10487311
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Summer;8(2):129-40
pubmed: 26021224
J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Aug;24(8):568-72
pubmed: 9266344
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Summer;7(2):141-9
pubmed: 24977249
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Dec;16(6):794-805
pubmed: 23458566
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Apr;28(4):443-452
pubmed: 27016157
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jun;24(6):671-8
pubmed: 22458628
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999 Dec;10(6):429-44
pubmed: 10740452
J Periodontol. 2001 Oct;72(10):1372-83
pubmed: 11699479
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Dec;11(6):521-9
pubmed: 11168245
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990 Summer;5(2):165-75
pubmed: 2133341
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 Jul;37(5):252-60
pubmed: 18606746