Tailored Precision: A Unique Case of Pelvic Osteosarcoma Management.
3D printing
Osteosarcoma
endoprosthesis
pelvis
titanium
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic case reports
ISSN: 2250-0685
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Case Rep
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101641392
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
02
05
2023
revised:
28
06
2023
medline:
1
9
2023
pubmed:
1
9
2023
entrez:
1
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Osteosarcoma of the pelvis poses challenges in surgical resection due to its anatomical location and extensive nature. This case report focuses on the clinical presentation and therapeutic outcomes of a 20-year-old patient with osteosarcoma of the right iliac bone. The study highlights the efficacy of 3D printing technology in creating customized implants for improved surgical outcomes. The case report presents the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of a patient with osteosarcoma of the right iliac bone. It emphasizes the impact of surgical resection extent and endoprosthetic reconstruction. The study highlights the advantages of 3D printing technology in creating customized implants that accurately fit the remaining bone. Limb-sparing surgery is advocated for better functional and psychological outcomes compared to amputation. The report also emphasizes the need for further research on alternative composite materials and discusses the limitations of 3D printing technology in orthopedics.The limitations of 3D printing, such as mechanical safety and material restrictions, are discussed, calling for future advancements to improve the reliability and effectiveness of 3D-printed implants in orthopedics. The present case report provides valuable perspectives into the efficacious management of pelvic osteosarcoma and underscores the distinctive advantages of 3D printing technology in improving surgical results. Limb-sparing surgery demonstrates enhanced functional and psychological outcomes compared to amputation. Utilizing 3D custom-made implants, significantly reduces the likelihood of revision surgeries attributed to implant failure, improves the surgical outcome and precision.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37654757
doi: 10.13107/jocr.2023.v13.i08.3812
pii: JOCR-13-47
pmc: PMC10465738
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
47-51Informations de copyright
Copyright: © Indian Orthopaedic Research Group.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest: Nil
Références
Acta Orthop. 2020 Aug;91(4):489-496
pubmed: 32396448
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Mar;74(3):321-30
pubmed: 1548258
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Feb 1;20(3):776-90
pubmed: 11821461
Cancer. 2009 Apr 1;115(7):1531-43
pubmed: 19197972
Cancer. 2005 Apr 1;103(7):1468-74
pubmed: 15739209
Nat Biomed Eng. 2020 Apr;4(4):370-380
pubmed: 31695178
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Jul;(388):167-77
pubmed: 11451116
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Aug 06;22(16):
pubmed: 34445182
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000 Feb;26(1):53-60
pubmed: 10718181
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Mar;(348):196-207
pubmed: 9553553