Evaluation of fracture resistance in class II tooth cavity using different techniques.
Class II cavity
endodontic
post core
restorative materials
teeth
Journal
Bioinformation
ISSN: 0973-2063
Titre abrégé: Bioinformation
Pays: Singapore
ID NLM: 101258255
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
02
07
2022
revised:
03
10
2022
accepted:
06
10
2022
medline:
1
9
2023
pubmed:
1
9
2023
entrez:
1
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It is of interest to evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically and non-endodontically treated teeth with class II cavity using different techniques and materials. Endodontic access cavities were prepared with the diamond fissure bur following the MOD cavity preparations,. The root canals preparation was done followed by obturation using the single cone obturation technique. Later all the samples were embedded in acrylic resin blocks and divided into 8 groups; Group 1: -Intact teeth (Control), Group 2: - MOD (unfilled), Group 3: - MOD restored with composite resin (3M FILTEK P-60 packable), Group 4: - MOD restored with Cention N (Ivoclar Vivadent), Group 5: - 10 mm fiber-post with composite resin, Group 6: - 5mm fiber post with composite resin, Group 7: - Ribbond on the occlusal and composite resin, and Group 8: - Horizontal fiber post with composite resin. Later all samples were subjected for fracture resistance testing using Universal Testing Machine. The mean fracture resistance of Control (513.2 N), Unfilled (60.2N), composite resin (221 N), cention N (88.9 N), 10 mm fiber post (271.4 N), 5 mm fiber post (245 N), Ribbond (456.4N), and horizontal fiber post (338.1N) was found. The fracture resistance values are statistically significant between each group. Best fracture resistance was found to be of intact teeth followed by ribbond on the occlusal surface after endodontic treatment and least fracture resistance of MOD unfilled. Thus, ribbond method is good for the occlusal of teeth compared to other materials for fracture resistance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37654840
doi: 10.6026/97320630018858
pii: 97320630018858
pmc: PMC10465775
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
858-861Informations de copyright
© 2022 Biomedical Informatics.
Références
Int Endod J. 2006 Nov;39(11):900-4
pubmed: 17014529
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Apr;81(4):380-5
pubmed: 10095205
Oper Dent. 2008 Sep-Oct;33(5):526-33
pubmed: 18833859
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Jan;111(1):30-4
pubmed: 24161260
Int J Biomater. 2016;2016:9138945
pubmed: 27656212
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;21(6):795-800
pubmed: 29888730
Oper Dent. 2009 Jan-Feb;34(1):11-7
pubmed: 19192832
J Endod. 2004 May;30(5):289-301
pubmed: 15107639
J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Apr;75(4):375-80
pubmed: 8642522
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006 Mar 01;11(2):E215-20
pubmed: 16505805
J Endod. 2015 Jun;41(6):907-12
pubmed: 25777502
Int Endod J. 2005 Feb;38(2):73-80
pubmed: 15667628