The Impact of the Addition of a Physical Therapy Assistant to the Treatment Team for Management of Neck Pain: A Retrospective Analysis of Outpatient Physical Therapy Clinics.

cervicalgia neck pain physical therapy physical therapy assistant rehabilitation

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Historique:
accepted: 31 07 2023
medline: 1 9 2023
pubmed: 1 9 2023
entrez: 1 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Introduction The impact of physical therapy assistants (PTAs) on patient outcomes, mostly in the acute and subacute setting, is well known in the literature. However, no study to date has examined the impact of using PTAs as part of a treatment team in the outpatient setting for common musculoskeletal conditions. The purpose of this study is to determine if physical therapy team composition, either physical therapists (PTs) only or a team consisting of PTs and PTAs, has a significant impact on patient outcomes in adult patients with musculoskeletal neck pain to help investigate an ideal practice pattern for outpatient physical therapy. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study analyzing the impact of physical therapy treatment team composition (PTs only, or team consisting of PTs and PTAs) on pain, active range-of-motion (AROM), and disability outcomes via the Neck Disability Index (NDI) in the conservative treatment of neck pain. All patients were treated with usual physical therapy care. Inclusion criteria involved patients with a diagnosis of neck pain (M48.2), older than 18 years old, a physical therapy evaluation procedure code (97161, 97162, 97163), and at least two visits per bout of physical therapy. Primary outcome measures were pain, bilateral rotation AROM, disability, and number of visits.  Results Included patients (n=195) had an average age of 60.8 years ± 16.1 years with an average number of total physical therapy visits of 7.4 visits ± 4.3 visits (range, 2 visits - 22 visits) with 120 patients (61.5%) treated by a PT only (PT-only group) and 75 patients (38.5%) treated by a team consisting of a PT and a PTA (PTA group). The PT-only group had significantly fewer visits than the PTA group (p<0.001). The PT-only group had a pain improvement of 2.1 points ± 2.3 points whereas the PTA group had a pain improvement of 2.2 points ± 2.4 points with no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.573). The PT-only group (n=46 patients) had an average rotation AROM improvement of 20.0 ± 17.4 degrees whereas the PTA group (n=40 patients) had an average rotation AROM improvement of 16.8 degrees ± 23.0 degrees with no significant difference between the level of rotation AROM improvement between the two groups (p=0.408). Furthermore, there was also no significant difference in the amount of NDI improvement seen in both groups (p=0.594). Conclusion There was no significant difference in patient outcomes for pain, AROM, and disability when PTAs were added to the physical therapy treatment team in the conservative management of neck pain in the outpatient setting. However, patients treated with a treatment team consisting of PTAs had significantly more visits, despite no significant change in outcomes. Randomized controlled trials are needed as the reasons for these findings can be many and require further research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37654958
doi: 10.7759/cureus.42751
pmc: PMC10468008
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e42751

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023, Baumann et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Feb;78(1_suppl):40S-46S
pubmed: 32856545
Phys Ther. 2020 Dec 7;100(12):2165-2173
pubmed: 32886786
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jan;89(1):69-74
pubmed: 18164333
Cureus. 2023 Feb 9;15(2):e34794
pubmed: 36915834
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Apr;38(4):417-427
pubmed: 29457258
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Feb;41(2):352-362
pubmed: 34291695
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Sep;17(9):e430-6
pubmed: 27464890
Physiother Can. 2011 Spring;63(2):140-5
pubmed: 22379252
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020 Apr;46:102069
pubmed: 31989963
Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr;48(4):e335-e336
pubmed: 32205628
Crit Care Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):2888-97
pubmed: 18766097
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Sep;38(9):A1-A34
pubmed: 18758050
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1975 Aug 14;8(6):415-20
pubmed: 1233242
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Feb;71(2):609-619
pubmed: 36571515
Physiother Res Int. 2010 Mar;15(1):24-34
pubmed: 20108236
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;47(7):A1-A83
pubmed: 28666405
Cureus. 2023 May 19;15(5):e39218
pubmed: 37337494
Med Care. 2017 Jun;55(6):615-622
pubmed: 28234756
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Oct;31:62-71
pubmed: 28750310
Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct;47(10):1442-1449
pubmed: 31414993

Auteurs

Anthony N Baumann (AN)

Department of Rehabilitation Services, University Hospitals, Cleveland, USA.

Deven P Curtis (DP)

College of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, USA.

Mingda Chen (M)

College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA.

Keith D Baldwin (KD)

Division of Orthopaedics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA.

Classifications MeSH