Sustained timber yield claims, considerations, and tradeoffs for selectively logged forests.
climate change mitigation
forest management
natural climate solutions
nature based solutions
timber growth and yield
Journal
PNAS nexus
ISSN: 2752-6542
Titre abrégé: PNAS Nexus
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918367777906676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
11
02
2022
accepted:
27
06
2022
medline:
1
7
2022
pubmed:
1
7
2022
entrez:
1
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
What is meant by sustainability depends on what is sustained and at what level. Sustainable forest management, for example, requires maintenance of a variety of values not the least of which is sustained timber yields (STYs). For the 1 Bha of the world's forests subjected to selective or partial logging, failure to maintain yields can be hidden by regulatory requirements and questionable auditing practices such as increasing the number of commercial species with each harvest, reducing the minimum size at which trees can be harvested and accepting logs of lower quality. For assertions of STY to be credible, clarity is needed about all these issues, as well as about the associated ecological and economic tradeoffs. Lack of clarity about sustainability heightens risks of unsubstantiated claims and unseen losses. STY is possible but often requires cutting cycles that are longer and logging intensities that are lower than prescribed by law, as well as effective use of low-impact logging practices and application of silvicultural treatments to promote timber stock recovery. These departures from business-as-usual practices will lower profit margins but generally benefit biodiversity and ecosystem services.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37654970
doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac102
pii: pgac102
pmc: PMC10468026
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
pgac102Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of National Academy of Sciences.
Références
Nature. 2021 Oct;598(7881):411-414
pubmed: 34671139
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jul 22;368(1625):20120302
pubmed: 23878332
Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 8;11(1):5978
pubmed: 33293507
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021 Aug;96(4):1301-1317
pubmed: 33663020
Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Sep;29(9):511-20
pubmed: 25092495
Elife. 2017 Jan 17;6:
pubmed: 28093097
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 16;375(1794):20190126
pubmed: 31983330
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 7;118(49):
pubmed: 34810238
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Apr;2(4):599-610
pubmed: 29483681
Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar 24;12(3):e8758
pubmed: 35356565
Conserv Biol. 2007 Aug;21(4):916-25
pubmed: 17650242
Science. 2020 Aug 14;369(6505):838-841
pubmed: 32792397
New Phytol. 2018 Oct;220(2):366-380
pubmed: 30247750
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 30;115(44):11221-11225
pubmed: 30249663