Personal protective behaviors in response to COVID-19: a longitudinal application of protection motivation theory.

COVID-19 hand hygiene mask wearing pandemic physical distancing protection motivation theory protective behaviors self-efficacy

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 28 03 2023
accepted: 17 07 2023
medline: 1 9 2023
pubmed: 1 9 2023
entrez: 1 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Disease outbreaks are expected to occur more frequently and spread more rapidly in the age of globalization. Personal protective behaviors strongly affect infection and death rates worldwide. It is therefore of prime importance to better understand which factors predict personal protective behaviors during a pandemic. Protection motivation theory (PMT) proposes that people's motivation to protect themselves is based on two appraisal processes: threat appraisal and coping appraisal. Building on PMT, this longitudinal study aimed to predict personal protective behaviors in response to COVID-19, including hand hygiene, physical distancing, and mask wearing. In the first wave of the study (November, 2020), the two appraisal processes as specified in PMT as well as intentions to perform protective behaviors were assessed in a representative sample of German adults ( Response rate for the second wave was high (87%). For all three behaviors, self-efficacy predicted intentions and also indirectly behavior (i.e., mediated via intentions). Furthermore, exploratory tests of alternative theoretical models suggested that both self-efficacy and costs have direct effects (i.e., independent from their relationship with intentions) on performed behavior. To support individuals to engage in protective behaviors during a pandemic, it is important to reduce barriers to action and to foster individuals' self-efficacy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37655201
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1195607
pmc: PMC10465328
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1195607

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Hinssen and Dohle.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Hum Nutr Diet. 2016 Jun;29(3):391-8
pubmed: 25919067
J Psychol. 1975 Sep;91(1):93-114
pubmed: 28136248
Br J Health Psychol. 2021 Sep;26(3):935-957
pubmed: 33847029
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 27;22(8):e21613
pubmed: 32759100
Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:237-51
pubmed: 26735430
Br J Nutr. 2016 Jun;115(12):2252-63
pubmed: 27185414
Ann Behav Med. 2004 Apr;27(2):125-30
pubmed: 15026296
Health Psychol. 2005 Jul;24(4S):S49-56
pubmed: 16045419
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Oct;95(4):962-77
pubmed: 18808271
Am J Crit Care. 2010 May;19(3):230-9
pubmed: 20436062
Health Psychol Rev. 2014;8(1):1-7
pubmed: 25053004
Ann Behav Med. 2020 Oct 1;54(10):713-727
pubmed: 32914831
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 4;11(1):e043577
pubmed: 33397669
Ann Behav Med. 2022 Apr 2;56(4):381-392
pubmed: 34964460
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jul;14(34):183-266
pubmed: 20630124
Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Jun;10(2):113-28
pubmed: 25117692
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;15(Pt 4):797-824
pubmed: 20109274
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):437-55
pubmed: 22506584
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Jun 27;6:100151
pubmed: 34557834
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;28(11):1267-74
pubmed: 17926278
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Jul 22;55(8):791-804
pubmed: 34165145
Health Commun. 2021 Jan;36(1):15-22
pubmed: 33190547
Soc Work Public Health. 2020 Sep 1;35(7):546-556
pubmed: 32970542
Lancet. 2000 Oct 14;356(9238):1307-12
pubmed: 11073019
Arch Public Health. 2021 May 12;79(1):74
pubmed: 33980316
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jan 03;11:2
pubmed: 21199571
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 12;10(2):e029484
pubmed: 32054622
Int J Behav Med. 2009;16(1):7-29
pubmed: 19214752
Br J Health Psychol. 2012 Feb;17(1):44-59
pubmed: 22233104
Health Psychol. 2008 Nov;27(6):722-7
pubmed: 19025267
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Jul 22;55(8):805-812
pubmed: 34228112

Auteurs

Marina Hinssen (M)

Gender in Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.

Simone Dohle (S)

Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Classifications MeSH