Neural electrophysiological correlates of detection and identification awareness.
Consciousness
ERP
Neural correlates
Journal
Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience
ISSN: 1531-135X
Titre abrégé: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101083946
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2023
10 2023
Historique:
accepted:
28
06
2023
medline:
4
10
2023
pubmed:
1
9
2023
entrez:
1
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Humans have conscious experiences of the events in their environment. Previous research from electroencephalography (EEG) has shown visual awareness negativity (VAN) at about 200 ms to be a neural correlate of consciousness (NCC). However, when considering VAN as an NCC, it is important to explore which particular experiences are associated with VAN. Recent research proposes that VAN is an NCC of lower-level experiences (detection) rather than higher-level experiences (identification). However, previous results are mixed and have several limitations. In the present study, the stimulus was a ring with a Gabor patch tilting either left or right. On each trial, subjects rated their awareness on a three-level perceptual awareness scale that captured both detection (something vs. nothing) and identification (identification vs. something). Separate staircases were used to adjust stimulus opacity to the detection threshold and the identification threshold. Bayesian linear mixed models provided extreme evidence (BF10 = 131) that VAN was stronger at the detection threshold than at the identification threshold. Mean VAN decreased from [Formula: see text]2.12 microV [[Formula: see text]2.86, [Formula: see text]1.42] at detection to [Formula: see text]0.46 microV [[Formula: see text]0.79, [Formula: see text]0.11] at identification. These results strongly support the claim that VAN is an NCC of lower-level experiences of seeing something rather than of higher-level experiences of specific properties of the stimuli. Thus, results are consistent with recurrent processing theory in that phenomenal visual consciousness is reflected by VAN. Further, results emphasize that it is important to consider the level of experience when searching for NCC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37656374
doi: 10.3758/s13415-023-01120-5
pii: 10.3758/s13415-023-01120-5
pmc: PMC10545648
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1303-1321Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Alday, P. M., & van Paridon, J. (2021). Away from arbitrary thresholds: Using robust statistics to improve artifact rejection in ERP (preprint). PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wqrb5
Allaire, J. J., Xie, Y., McPherson, J., Luraschi, J., Ushey, K., Atkins, A., ... Iannone, R. (2021). Rmarkdown: Dynamic documents for r. manual. https://github.com/rstudio/rmarkdown
Andersen, L. M., Pedersen, M. N., Sandberg, K., & Overgaard, M. (2016). Occipital MEG activity in the early time range ([Formula: see text] ms) predicts graded changes in perceptual consciousness. Cerebral Cortex, 26(6), 2677–2688. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv108
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv108
pubmed: 26009612
Andersen, L. M., Vinding, M. C., Sandberg, K., & Overgaard, M. (2022). Task requirements affect the neural correlates of consciousness. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15820,. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15820
Aru, J., & Bachmann, T. (2017). In and Out of Consciousness: How Does Conscious Processing (D)evolve Over Time? Frontiers in Psychology, 8,. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00128
Aru, J., Bachmann, T., Singer, W., & Melloni, L. (2012). Distilling the neural correlates of consciousness. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(2), 737–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.12.003
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.12.003
Auksztulewicz, R., & Blankenburg, F. (2013). Subjective Rating of Weak Tactile Stimuli Is Parametrically Encoded in Event-Related Potentials. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(29), 11878–11887. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4243-12.2013
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4243-12.2013
pubmed: 23864677
Biasiucci, A., Franceschiello, B., & Murray, M. M. (2019). Electroencephalography. Current Biology, 29(3), R80–R85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.052
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.052
pubmed: 30721678
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., Rothstein, H., & Ebooks Corporation. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. OCLC: 1224788447. 10.
Brown, V. A. (2021). An Introduction to Linear Mixed-Effects Modeling in R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 251524592096035. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920960351
doi: 10.1177/2515245920960351
Bürkner, P. .-C. (2017). Brms : An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01
doi: 10.18637/jss.v080.i01
Bürkner, P. .-C. (2018). Advanced Bayesian Multilevel Modeling with the R Package brms. The R Journal, 10(1), 395. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-017
doi: 10.32614/RJ-2018-017
Carp, J. (2012). The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature. NeuroImage, 63(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.004
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.004
pubmed: 22796459
Cohen, M. A., Ortego, K., Kyroudis, A., & Pitts, M. (2020). Distinguishing the Neural Correlates of Perceptual Awareness and Postperceptual Processing. The Journal of Neuroscience, 40(25), 4925–4935. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0120-20.2020
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0120-20.2020
pubmed: 32409620
pmcid: 7326348
Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1990). Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the neurosciences, 2, 263-275. Retrieved June 4, 2019, from http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20130816-103136937
Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J.-P. (2011). Experimental and Theoretical Approaches to Conscious Processing. Neuron, 70(2), 200–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018
pubmed: 21521609
Dehaene, S., Changeux, J.-P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(5), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007
pubmed: 16603406
Dellert, T., Krebs, S., Bruchmann, M., Schindler, S., Peters, A., & Straube, T. (2022). Neural correlates of consciousness in an attentional blink paradigm with uncertain target relevance. NeuroImage, 264, 119679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119679
Dellert, T., Müller-Bardorff, M., Schlossmacher, I., Pitts, M., Hofmann, D., Bruchmann, M., & Straube, T. (2021). Dissociating the Neural Correlates of Consciousness and Task Relevance in Face Perception Using Simultaneous EEG-fMRI. The Journal of Neuroscience, 41(37), 7864–7875. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2799-20.2021
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2799-20.2021
pubmed: 34301829
pmcid: 8445054
Dembski, C., Koch, C., & Pitts, M. (2021). Perceptual awareness negativity: A physiological correlate of sensory consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(8), 660–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.05.009
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.05.009
pubmed: 34172384
Derda, M., Koculak, M., Windey, B., Gociewicz, K., Wierzchoń, M., Cleeremans, A., & Binder, M. (2019). The role of levels of processing in disentangling the ERP signatures of conscious visual processing. Consciousness and Cognition, 73, 102767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.102767
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102767
pubmed: 31260842
Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Palgrave Macmillan.
Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003
doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003
Eklund, R., & Wiens, S. (2018). Visual awareness negativity is an early neural correlate of awareness: A preregistered study with two gabor sizes. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(1), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-0562-z
doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0562-z
Eklund, R., & Wiens, S. (2019). Auditory awareness negativity is an electrophysiological correlate of awareness in an auditory threshold task. Consciousness and Cognition, 71, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.03.008
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.03.008
pubmed: 30928900
Förster, J., Koivisto, M., & Revonsuo, A. (2020). ERP and MEG correlates of visual consciousness: The second decade. Consciousness and Cognition, 80, 102917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2020.102917
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.102917
pubmed: 32193077
Franke, M., & Roettger, T. B. (2019). Bayesian regression modeling (for factorial designs): A tutorial. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cdxv3
Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (2013). The Garden of Forking Paths: Why Multiple Comparisons Can Be a Problem, Even When There Is No “Fishing Expedition” or “P-Hacking” and the Research Hypothesis Was Posited Ahead of Time. Department of Statistics, Columbia University. http://www.stat.columbia.edu/gelman/research/unpublished/phacking.pdf
Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (2014). The statistical crisis in science: Data-dependent analysis-a “garden of forking paths”-explains why many statistically significant comparisons don’t hold up. American Scientist, 102 (6), 460–466. Retrieved January 27, 2022, from https://www.americanscientist.org/article/the-statistical-crisis-in-science
Gramfort, A., Luessi, M., Larson, E., Engemann, D. A., Strohmeier, D., Brodbeck, C., & Hämäläinen, M. (2013). MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-python. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00267
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00267
Gramfort, A., Luessi, M., Larson, E., Engemann, D. A., Strohmeier, D., Brodbeck, C., & Hämäläinen, M. S. (2014). MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data. NeuroImage, 86, 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.027
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.027
pubmed: 24161808
Jimenez, M., Grassini, S., Montoro, P. R., Luna, D., & Koivisto, M. (2018). Neural correlates of visual awareness at stimulus low vs. high-levels of processing. Neuropsychologia, 121, 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.11.001
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.11.001
pubmed: 30408463
Jimenez, M., Hinojosa, J. A., & Montoro, P. R. (2020). Visual awareness and the levels of processing hypothesis: A critical review. Consciousness and Cognition, 85,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2020.103022
Jimenez, M., Poch, C., Villalba-García, C., Sabater, L., Hinojosa, J. A., Montoro, P. R., & Koivisto, M. (2021). The Level of Processing Modulates Visual Awareness: Evidence from Behavioral and Electrophysiological Measures. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1–16,. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocna01712
Keil, A., Debener, S., Gratton, G., Junghöfer, M., Kappenman, E. S., Luck, S., & J.,... Yee, C. M. (2014). Committee report: Publication guidelines and recommendations for studies using electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. Psychophysiology, 51(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12147
Kiefer, M., & Kammer, T. (2017). The emergence of visual awareness: Temporal dynamics in relation to task and mask type. Frontiers in Psychology, 8,. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00315
Koivisto, M., Grassini, S., Salminen-Vaparanta, N., & Revonsuo, A. (2017). Different electrophysiological correlates of visual awareness for detection and identification. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(9), 1621–1631. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocna01149
doi: 10.1162/jocna01149
pubmed: 28557691
Koivisto, M., Kainulainen, P., & Revonsuo, A. (2009). The relationship between awareness and attention: Evidence from erp responses. Neuropsychologia, 47(13), 2891–2899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.016
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.016
pubmed: 19545577
Koivisto, M., & Revonsuo, A. (2008). The role of selective attention in visual awareness of stimulus features: Electrophysiological studies. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.8.2.195
doi: 10.3758/CABN.8.2.195
Koivisto, M., & Revonsuo, A. (2010). Event-Related Brain Potential Correlates of Visual Awareness. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(6), 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.002
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.002
Koivisto, M., Revonsuo, A., & Salminen, N. (2005). Independence of visual awareness from attention at early processing stages. NeuroReport, 16(8), 817. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200505310-00008
doi: 10.1097/00001756-200505310-00008
pubmed: 15891577
Kretzschmar, F., & Alday, P. M. (2020). Principles of statistical analyses: Old and new tools (preprint). PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nyj3k
Kronemer, S. I., Aksen, M., Ding, J. Z., Ryu, J. H., Xin, Q., Ding, Z., & Blumenfeld, H. (2022). Human visual consciousness involves large scale cortical and subcortical networks independent of task report and eye movement activity. Nature Communications, 13(1), 7342. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35117-4
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35117-4
pubmed: 36446792
pmcid: 9707162
Lamme, V. A. F. (2006). Towards a true neural stance on consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(11), 494–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.001
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.001
pubmed: 16997611
Lamme, V. A. F. (2010). How Neuroscience Will Change Our View on Consciousness. Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(3), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588921003731586
doi: 10.1080/17588921003731586
pubmed: 24168336
Lamme, V. A. F. (2018). Challenges for Theories of Consciousness: Seeing or Knowing, the Missing Ingredient and How to Deal with Panpsychism. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 373(1755), 20170344. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0344
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0344
pubmed: 30061458
pmcid: 6074090
Lamy, D., Salti, M., & Bar-Haim, Y. (2009). Neural Correlates of Subjective Awareness and Unconscious Processing: An ERP Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21 (7), 1435–1446. Retrieved September 27, 2016, from
Luck, S. J. (2014). An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique (Second edition). The MIT Press.
Luck, S. J., & Gaspelin, N. (2017). How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn’t). Psychophysiology, 54(1), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12639
doi: 10.1111/psyp.12639
pubmed: 28000253
pmcid: 5178877
Makin, T. R., & Orban de Xivry, J.-J. (2019). Ten common statistical mistakes to watch out for when writing or reviewing a manuscript. eLife, 8, e48175. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48175
Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). bayestestR: Describing Effects and their Uncertainty, Existence and Significance within the Bayesian Framework. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(40), 1541. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01541
Mashour, G. A., Roelfsema, P., Changeux, J.-P., & Dehaene, S. (2020). Conscious processing and the global neuronal workspace hypothesis. Neuron, 105(5), 776–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.026
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.026
pubmed: 32135090
pmcid: 8770991
Matta, T. H., Flournoy, J. C., & Byrne, M. L. (2018). Making an unknown unknown a known unknown: Missing data in longitudinal neuroimaging studies. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 33, 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.10.001
doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.10.001
pubmed: 29129673
Meyer, K. (2011). Primary Sensory Cortices, Top-down Projections and Conscious Experience. Progress in Neurobiology, 94(4), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.05.010
doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.05.010
pubmed: 21683755
Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Sert, N. P., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021
doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021
Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708274114
Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, ... Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
Pitts, M. A., Martínez, A., & Hillyard, S. A. (2012). Visual Processing of Contour Patterns under Conditions of Inattentional Blindness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(2), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocna00111
doi: 10.1162/jocna00111
pubmed: 21812561
Pitts, M. A., Metzler, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (2014). Isolating Neural Correlates of Conscious Perception from Neural Correlates of Reporting One’s Perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 5,. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01078
R core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved August 1, 2019, from https://www.R-project.org/
Ramsøy, T. Z., & Overgaard, M. (2004). Introspection and Subliminal Perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000041900.30172.e8
doi: 10.1023/B:PHEN.0000041900.30172.e8
RStudio Team. (2020). Rstudio: Integrated development environment for R. Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com
Salti, M., Bar-Haim, Y., & Lamy, D. (2012). The P3 component of the ERP reflects conscious perception, not confidence. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(2), 961–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.01.012
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.01.012
pubmed: 22341937
Sandberg, K., Bibby, B. M., & Overgaard, M. (2013). Measuring and testing awareness of emotional face expressions. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(3), 806–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.015
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.015
pubmed: 23728457
Sandberg, K., & Overgaard, M. (2015, March 1). Using the perceptual awareness scale (PAS). In Overgaard, M. (ed.), Behavioral Methods in Consciousness Research (pp. 181–196). Oxford University Press. Retrieved June 11, 2019, from http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688890.001.0001/acprof-9780199688890-chapter-11ef
Sassenhagen, J., & Alday, P. M. (2016). A common misapplication of statistical inference: Nuisance control with null-hypothesis significance tests. Brain and Language, 162, 42–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.08.001
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.08.001
pubmed: 27543688
Schlossmacher, I., Dellert, T., Pitts, M., Bruchmann, M., & Straube, T. (2020). Differential Effects of Awareness and Task Relevance on Early and Late ERPs in a No-Report Visual Oddball Paradigm. The Journal of Neuroscience, 40(14), 2906–2913. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2077-19.2020
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2077-19.2020
pubmed: 32122954
pmcid: 7117899
Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human. Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z
doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z
Snyder, J. S., Yerkes, B. D., & Pitts, M. A. (2015). Testing Domain-General Theories of Perceptual Awareness with Auditory Brain Responses. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(6), 295–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.002
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.002
pubmed: 25960421
Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637
Tagliabue, C. F., Mazzi, C., Bagattini, C., & Savazzi, S. (2016). Early local activity in temporal areas reflects graded content of visual perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 7,. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00572
Trübutschek, D., Yang, Y.-F., Gianelli, C., Cesnaite, E., Fischer, N. L., Vinding, M. C., ... Nilsonne, G. (2022, December 12). EEGManyPipelines: A large-scale, grass-root multi-analyst study of EEG analysis practices in the wild (preprint). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/jq342
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J.,... Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25 (1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Morey, R. D., & Lee, M. D. (2016). Bayesian benefits for the pragmatic researcher. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(3), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416643289
doi: 10.1177/0963721416643289
Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA statement on p -values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
doi: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
Wichmann, F. . A., & Hill, N. . J. (2001). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(8), 1293–1313. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194544
doi: 10.3758/BF03194544
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D., François, R.,...Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4 (43), 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
Wiens, S. (2023). Open data: Neural electrophysiological correlates of detection and identification awareness. https://doi.org/10.17045/sthlmuni.21354195
Wiens, S., & Nilsson, M. E. (2017). Performing contrast analysis in factorial designs: From NHST to confidence intervals and beyond. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77(4), 690–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416668950
doi: 10.1177/0013164416668950
pubmed: 29805179
Wilenius, M. E., & Revonsuo, A. T. (2007). Timing of the Earliest ERP Correlate of Visual Awareness. Psychophysiology, 44(5), 703–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00546.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00546.x
pubmed: 17584186
Windey, B., Vermeiren, A., Atas, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2014). The graded and dichotomous nature of visual awareness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1641), 20130282. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0282
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0282
Winter, B. (2019). Statistics for linguists: An introduction using R. Routledge.
Xie, Y., Allaire, J. J., & Grolemund, G. (2019). R Markdown: The definitive guide. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group. https://bookdown.org/yihui/rmarkdown