Design and Implementation of a Multidisciplinary High-Fidelity Simulation Course for the Management of Malignant Spinal Cord Compression.

Clinical simulation High fidelity simulation Interdisciplinary Multidisciplinary Radiation Oncology

Journal

Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education
ISSN: 1543-0154
Titre abrégé: J Cancer Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8610343

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Historique:
accepted: 23 08 2023
medline: 20 11 2023
pubmed: 1 9 2023
entrez: 1 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

High-fidelity simulation (HFS) training is suited to high-stakes, uncommon situations such as malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC), allowing for rare hands-on practice. This pilot study was created as the first of its kind to examine educational outcomes of a radiation therapist (RTT)-led multidisciplinary radiation oncology (RO) emergency simulation course. A multidisciplinary course design team composed of RO residents, radiation oncologists, RTT course instructors, and medical physicists created a high-fidelity MSCC simulation course using collaboratively developed learning goals. Fifteen learners including RO residents, senior RTT students, and a medical physics (MP) resident participated in a live, RTT-facilitated simulation. Participants completed anonymized pre- and post-simulation standard interdisciplinary education perception (IEP) scales and a course evaluation assessing educational outcomes. Standard IEP questionnaire results showed highly favorable perceptions of respondents' own specialty and other allied specialties, with mean total pre-simulation scores of 91.76 and post-simulation scores of 94.23. The course evaluation assessed 10 learning objective domains, with significant improvements seen in self-rated post-course knowledge in 9 domains. Pre-course evaluations showed that 6/15 participants agreed or strongly agreed that they felt comfortable in their knowledge of all included domains; after course completion, 14/15 participants agreed or strongly agreed they felt comfortable in all domains. Collaboratively designed and led HFS courses are not only viable but can be an effective means of improving learning outcomes for RO residents, RTT students, and MP residents.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37656394
doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02364-y
pii: 10.1007/s13187-023-02364-y
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1939-1947

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education.

Références

Jimenez YA, Thwaites DI, Juneja P, Lewis SJ (2018) Interprofessional education: evaluation of a radiation therapy and medical physics student simulation workshop. J Med Radiat Sci 65(2):106–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.256
doi: 10.1002/jmrs.256 pubmed: 29359415 pmcid: 5985983
Vozenilek JA, Gordon JA (2008) Future directions: a simulation-based continuing medical education network in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 15(11):978–981. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00256.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00256.x pubmed: 19032552
Wayne DB, Didwania A, Feinglass J, Fudala MJ, Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC (2008) Simulation-based education improves quality of care during cardiac arrest team responses at an academic teaching hospital: a case-control study. Chest 133(1):56–61. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.07-0131
doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0131 pubmed: 17573509
Brown LC, Laack TA, Ma DJ, Olivier KR, Laack NN (2014) Multidisciplinary medical simulation: a novel educational approach to preparing radiation oncology residents for oncologic emergent on-call treatments. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 90(3):705–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.053
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.053 pubmed: 25304952
Cook DA, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, Hatala R (2013) Technology-enhanced simulation to assess health professionals: a systematic review of validity evidence, research methods, and reporting quality. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll 88(6):872–883. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828ffdcf
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828ffdcf
Rooney MK et al (2018) Simulation as more than a treatment-planning tool: a systematic review of the literature on radiation oncology simulation-based medical education. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 102(2):257–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.064
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.064 pubmed: 30191859 pmcid: 8015756
Maranzano E, Latini P (1995) Effectiveness of radiation therapy without surgery in metastatic spinal cord compression: final results from a prospective trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32(4):959–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(95)00572-g
doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00572-g pubmed: 7607970
Giuliani M et al (2014) Evaluation of high-fidelity simulation training in radiation oncology using an outcomes logic model. Radiat Oncol 9(1):189. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-189
doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-189 pubmed: 25169674 pmcid: 4155118
Smith ME, Navaratnam A, Jablenska L, Dimitriadis PA, Sharma R (2015) A randomized controlled trial of simulation-based training for ear, nose, and throat emergencies. Laryngoscope 125(8):1816–1821. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25179
doi: 10.1002/lary.25179 pubmed: 25639957
Williams H et al (2015) Simulation of cardiac emergencies with real patients. Clin Teach 12(5):341–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12322
doi: 10.1111/tct.12322 pubmed: 26043924
Chamunyonga C, Edwards C, Caldwell PJ, Rutledge P, Burbery J (2020) Leadership in the radiation therapy profession: the importance of understanding the potential benefits and theoretical perspectives. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 51(4):535–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2020.09.008
doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.09.008 pubmed: 33160897
Luecht RM, Madsen MK, Taugher MP, Petterson BJ (1990) Assessing professional perceptions: design and validation of an Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale. J Allied Health 19(2):181–191
pubmed: 2365636
Akthar AS, Golden DW (2019) A global call for increased interdisciplinary oncologic education. Radiother Oncol 133:227–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.12.020
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.12.020 pubmed: 30642685
O’Higgins N, Eriksen JG, Wyld L, Benstead K (2018) Interdisciplinary training for cancer specialists: the time has come. Radiother Oncol 129(3):415–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.08.004
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.08.004 pubmed: 30197152
Mazur LM et al (2020) Impact of simulation-based training on radiation therapists’ workload, situation awareness, and performance. Adv Radiat Oncol 5(6):1106–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.09.008
doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.09.008 pubmed: 33305071 pmcid: 7718555
Chau M, Arruzza E, Johnson N (2022) Simulation-based education for medical radiation students: a scoping review. J Med Radiat Sci 69(3):367–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.572
doi: 10.1002/jmrs.572 pubmed: 35178870 pmcid: 9442285
Nousiainen MT et al (2016) Simulation for teaching orthopaedic residents in a competency-based curriculum: do the benefits justify the increased costs? Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(4):935–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4512-6
doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4512-6 pubmed: 26335344
Nuzhat A, Salem RO, Shehri FNA, Hamdan NA (2014) Role and challenges of simulation in undergraduate curriculum. Med Teach 36(sup1):S69–S73. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.886017
doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.886017 pubmed: 24617788
Zendejas B, Wang AT, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, Cook DA (2013) Cost: the missing outcome in simulation-based medical education research: a systematic review. Surgery 153(2):160–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.06.025
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.06.025 pubmed: 22884087
Dillon P, Noble K, Kpalan L (2009) Simulation as a means to foster collaborative interdisciplinary education. Nurs Educ Perspect 30(2):87–90
pubmed: 19476071
Wellmon R, Lefebvre KM, Ferry D (2017) Effects of high-fidelity simulation on physical therapy and nursing students’ attitudes toward interprofessional learning and collaboration. J Nurs Educ 56(8):456–465. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20170712-03
doi: 10.3928/01484834-20170712-03 pubmed: 28787067

Auteurs

Yiming Michael Zhu (YM)

Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. yzhu11@ualberta.ca.

Brian Chwyl (B)

Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Susan Fawcett (S)

Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Fan Yang (F)

Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Heather Warkentin (H)

Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Sunita Ghosh (S)

Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Brock Debenham (B)

Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Adele Duimering (A)

Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Mustafa Al Balushi (M)

Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH