Hysteroscopic morcellation vs. curettage for removal of retained products of conception: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.


Journal

Fertility and sterility
ISSN: 1556-5653
Titre abrégé: Fertil Steril
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372772

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 23 03 2023
revised: 19 08 2023
accepted: 23 08 2023
medline: 28 11 2023
pubmed: 2 9 2023
entrez: 1 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To study the comparison between hysteroscopic morcellation (HM) of retained products of conception (RPOC) with ultrasound (US)-guided electric vacuum aspiration in terms of intrauterine adhesion (IUA) formation, efficacy, and complications. A randomized controlled, nonblinded trial. Three teaching hospitals and one university hospital from April 2015 to June 2022. A total of 133 women with RPOC on US, ranging from 1-4 cm, were randomized to receive either HM or electric vacuum aspiration. Hysteroscopic morcellation was performed with the TruClear System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Electric vacuum aspiration was performed using an 8- or 10-mm flexible plastic Karman cannula under US guidance. Women allocated to vacuum aspiration underwent the procedure as soon as possible. In the HM group, an office diagnostic hysteroscopy was planned a minimum of 6 weeks after the end of pregnancy, followed by retained product of conception removal at least 8 weeks after the end of the pregnancy. Postoperatively, an office second-look hysteroscopy was scheduled to assess the primary outcome of IUAs. Postoperative IUAs were seen in 14.3% (9/63) of patients in the HM group and 20.6% (13/64) of patients in the vacuum aspiration group (-6% [-19.1% to 7.1%]). Significantly more RPOC were removed completely by HM compared with vacuum aspiration (95.2% vs. 82.5% (-14% [-24.9% to -3.1%]), and additional operative hysteroscopy was less frequently necessary in the HM group (12.5%) compared with the vacuum aspiration group (31.3%) (-20.1% [-34.3% to -6%]). The median operating time was shorter for vacuum aspiration compared with HM (5.80 minutes vs. 7.15 minutes). No differences were observed between HM and vacuum aspiration for the occurrence of intraoperative or postoperative complications (5.5% vs. 5.0% and 2.7% vs. 1.3%, respectively). In our randomized controlled trial, no significant differences were found in the occurrence of IUAs and complications. However, the RPOC were more often completely removed by HM than vacuum aspiration, and the HM group required fewer additional hysteroscopic treatments. NTR4923 (https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NTR4923). Date of registration: November 23, 2014, date of initial participant enrollment: January 1, 2015.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37657600
pii: S0015-0282(23)01722-3
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.08.956
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1243-1251

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests L.P.W. has nothing to disclose. T.W.H. (the Ghent University Hospital) has received compensation from Medtronic for a lecture on RPOC. C.M.R. has nothing to disclose. L.W.P. has nothing to disclose. S.W. has nothing to disclose. B.C.S. has received compensation from Medtronic on an hourly basis for lectures on HM and donated all the compensation to a foundation that promotes research in obstetrics and gynecology. H.A.v.V. has received compensation from Medtronic on an hourly basis for lectures on HM and donated all the compensation to a foundation that promotes research in obstetrics and gynecology.

Auteurs

Liselot P Wagenaar (LP)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Electronic address: liselot.wagenaar@catharinaziekenhuis.nl.

Tjalina W Hamerlynck (TW)

Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Women's Clinic, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Celine M Radder (CM)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Louisette W Peters (LW)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Steven Weyers (S)

Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Women's Clinic, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Benedictus C Schoot (BC)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Huib A van Vliet (HA)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH