Use of Analog and Human Insulin in a European Hemodialysis Cohort With Type 2 Diabetes: Associations With Mortality, Hospitalization, MACE, and Hypoglycemia.

Hemodialysis insulin major adverse cardiovascular events mortality type 2 diabetes

Journal

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation
ISSN: 1523-6838
Titre abrégé: Am J Kidney Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8110075

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 07 11 2022
revised: 17 05 2023
accepted: 23 05 2023
pubmed: 2 9 2023
medline: 2 9 2023
entrez: 1 9 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Poor glycemic control may contribute to the high mortality rate in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving hemodialysis. Insulin type may influence glycemic control, and its choice may be an opportunity to improve outcomes. This study assessed whether treatment with analog insulin compared with human insulin is associated with different outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes and kidney failure receiving hemodialysis. Retrospective cohort study. People in the Analyzing Data, Recognizing Excellence and Optimizing Outcomes (AROii) study with kidney failure commencing hemodialysis and type 2 diabetes being treated with insulin within 288 dialysis facilities between 2007 and 2009 across 7 European countries. Study participants were followed for 3 years. People with type 1 diabetes were excluded using an established administrative data algorithm. Treatment with an insulin analog or human insulin. All-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause hospitalization, and confirmed hypoglycemia (blood glucose<3.0mmol/L sampled during hemodialysis). Inverse probability weighted Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios for analog insulin compared with human insulin. There were 713 insulin analog and 733 human insulin users. Significant variation in insulin type by country was observed. Comparing analog with human insulin at 3 years, the percentage of patients experiencing end points and adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) were 22.0% versus 31.4% (AHR, 0.808 [95% CI, 0.66-0.99], P=0.04) for all-cause mortality, 26.8% versus 35.9% (AHR, 0.817 [95% CI, 0.68-0.98], P=0.03) for MACE, and 58.2% versus 75.0% (AHR, 0.757 [95% CI, 0.67-0.86], P<0.001) for hospitalization. Hypoglycemia was comparable between insulin types at 14.1% versus 15.0% (AHR, 1.169 [95% CI, 0.80-1.72], P=0.4). Consistent strength and direction of the associations were observed across sensitivity analyses. Residual confounding, lack of more detailed glycemia data. In this large multinational cohort of people with type 2 diabetes and kidney failure receiving maintenance hemodialysis, treatment with analog insulins was associated with better clinical outcomes when compared with human insulin. People with diabetes who are receiving dialysis for kidney failure are at high risk of cardiovascular disease and death. This study uses information from 1,446 people with kidney failure from 7 European countries who are receiving dialysis, have type 2 diabetes, and are prescribed either insulin identical to that made in the body (human insulin) or insulins with engineered extra features (insulin analog). After 3 years, fewer participants receiving analog insulins had died, had been admitted to the hospital, or had a cardiovascular event (heart attack, stroke, heart failure, or peripheral vascular disease). These findings suggest that analog insulins should be further explored as a treatment leading to better outcomes for people with diabetes on dialysis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37657634
pii: S0272-6386(23)00775-8
doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.05.010
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Thomas Ebert (T)

Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Medical Department III, Endocrinology, Nephrology, Rheumatology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.

Nosheen Sattar (N)

Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield.

Marni Greig (M)

Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield; Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield.

Claudia Lamina (C)

Medical University of Innsbruck, Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Innsbruck, Austria.

Marc Froissart (M)

Centre de Recherche Clinique (CRC), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Kai-Uwe Eckardt (KU)

Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Jürgen Floege (J)

Division of Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, RWTH University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Florian Kronenberg (F)

Medical University of Innsbruck, Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Innsbruck, Austria.

Peter Stenvinkel (P)

Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

David C Wheeler (DC)

Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

James Fotheringham (J)

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield; Sheffield Kidney Institute, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield. Electronic address: j.fotheringham@sheffield.ac.uk.

Classifications MeSH