Feasibility, comprehensibility and acceptability of the VISION-Cog, a novel tool to assess cognitive impairment in visually impaired older adults: a cross-sectional pilot study in Singapore.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 09 2023
Historique:
medline: 4 9 2023
pubmed: 2 9 2023
entrez: 1 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We pilot-tested the The VISION-Cog was iteratively fine-tuned through pilot studies and expert-panel discussion. In the first pilot study (Stage 1), we recruited 15 visually impaired and cognitively normal participants aged ≥60 years to examine the pilot VISION-Cog's feasibility (length of time to administer), comprehensibility (clarity of instructions) and acceptability (participant burden). We then presented the pilot results to the expert panel (Stage 2) who decided via agreement on a revised version of the VISION-Cog. Subsequently, we conducted a second pilot study (Stage 3) on another four participants to ascertain improvement in feasibility, comprehensibility and acceptability of the revised version. Singapore Eye Research Institute. Nineteen Asian adults aged ≥60 years with visual impairment (defined as near visual acuity worse than N8) were recruited. Revised VISION-Cog. The VISION-Cog was deemed feasible, taking approximately 60 min to complete on average. All participants agreed that the test instructions were clear, and the battery did not cause undue discomfort or frustration. The data collector rated all tests as very user-friendly (score of 5/5). Minor modifications to the pilot VISION-Cog were suggested by the panel to improve its safety, clarity of instructions and content validity, which were incorporated and iteratively tested in the second pilot study until no further issues emerged. Using an iterative mixed-methods process, we have developed a feasible, comprehensible and acceptable 5-domain and 9-item visually independent VISION-Cog test battery suitable to assist CI diagnosis in older adults with visual impairment. We will assess its diagnostic potential against clinician-based assessment of CI in subsequent phases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37657840
pii: bmjopen-2023-072151
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072151
pmc: PMC10476112
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e072151

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 29;13(6):e072501
pubmed: 37385749
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2020 Oct;42(8):781-793
pubmed: 32878561
Ophthalmology. 2021 Jul;128(7):981-992
pubmed: 33333104
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Nov;29(11):1771-1784
pubmed: 28691649
Aging Dis. 2020 Dec 1;11(6):1444-1458
pubmed: 33269099
J Neurol Sci. 2002 Nov 15;203-204:49-52
pubmed: 12417356
Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:27-51
pubmed: 11752478
Intern Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;10(3):373-83
pubmed: 25430678
Age Ageing. 2013 Jan;42(1):98-102
pubmed: 23108164
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;45(4):1127-38
pubmed: 25672767
Age Ageing. 2022 May 1;51(5):
pubmed: 35639799
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):88
pubmed: 28126032
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2014 Aug;29(5):442-55
pubmed: 24903208
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2014 May;26(3):310-9
pubmed: 22535554
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Sep;5(9):e888-e897
pubmed: 28779882
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 1;13(9):e072151
pubmed: 37657840

Auteurs

Tai Anh Vu (TA)

Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

Eva Fenwick (E)

Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Population Health Research, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.

Kinjal Doshi (K)

Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Preeti Gupta (P)

Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Population Health Research, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.

Shin Yi Quek (SY)

Department of Psychology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore.

Christopher Chen (C)

Departments of Pharmacology and Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Simon Ting (S)

Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.

Adeline S L Ng (ASL)

Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.

Philip Yap (P)

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore.

Donald Yeo (D)

KALL Psychological & Counselling Services Pte Ltd, Singapore.

Dan Milea (D)

Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Population Health Research, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.

Ecosse Lamoureux (E)

Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore ecosse.lamoureux@duke-nus.edu.sg.
Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH