Evaluation of lumbar lordosis in symptomatic individuals and comparative analysis of six different techniques: a retrospective radiologic study.


Journal

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
ISSN: 1432-0932
Titre abrégé: Eur Spine J
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9301980

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 23 01 2023
accepted: 06 08 2023
revised: 21 07 2023
medline: 27 11 2023
pubmed: 2 9 2023
entrez: 1 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of this study; evaluate lumbar lordosis (LL) in symptomatic individuals with six different techniques and to examine the techniques comparatively. Thus, to provide an overview of lumbal lordosis and techniques. Cobb L1-L5, Cobb L1-S1, Posterior Tangent, tangential radiologic assessment of lumbar lordosis (TRALL), vertebral centroid measurement of lumbar lordosis (CLL) and Risser Ferguson measurement techniques were used to assess LL from radiographs of 175 symptomatic adults. Correlations between techniques and relationship between the measurements obtained, gender and age were analyzed. Also ınterclass correlation (ICC) analyzed. Bland-Altman plots were performed to compare the techniques with Cobb. ICC for all methods were greater than 0.96. For each method, no difference in LL was observed with respect to gender or age (p > 0.05). High positive correlation was observed between the Risser Ferguson, Posterior Tangent, Cobb L1-L5, Cobb L1-S1 and CLL techniques (p < 0.001), and moderate positive correlation between TRALL and all other techniques (p < 0.001). In this study, it was found that the mean lumbar lordosis values of symptomatic participants were lower than most of the other asymptomatic studies in the literature and there was no significant difference in lumbar lordosis values in terms of gender and age in symptomatic individuals. Based on statistical findings, Risser Ferguson can be used to assess LL. These results and the data obtained as a result of the comparative examination of techniques according to age groups and gender will benefit clinicians and those working in the field by providing a better understanding LL.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37658171
doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07886-z
pii: 10.1007/s00586-023-07886-z
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

4118-4127

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Önen MR, Naderi S (2013) Spinal deformitelere genel Yaklaşım. Türk Nöroşirürji Dergisi 23(2):1–12
Üzümcügil O, Benli İT, Ofluoğlu E (eds) (2016) Omurganın sagital plan deformiteleri. Türk Omurga Derneği Yayınları, Fatih
Arıncı K, Anatomi EA, Kitapevi G (2006) 1. cilt. 4. baskı
Battié MC, Videman T, Kaprio J et al (2009) The Twin Spine Study: contributions to a changing view of disc degeneration. Spine J 9:47–59
Cote P, Cassidy JD, Yong-Hing K et al (1997) Apophysial joint degeneration, disc degeneration, and sagittal curve of the cervical spine. Can they be measured relaibly on radiographs? Spine 22:859–864
Adams MA, Hutton WC (1985) The effect of posture on the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 67:625–629
Bernhardt M, Bridwell KH (1989) Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine 14:717–721
Chokshi FH, Kadom N, Dwivedi N et al (2019) Radiographic Cobb angle: a feature of congenital lumbar spine stenosis. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 48(1):45–49
Sunami T, Kotani T, Aoki Y et al (2022) Large lumbar lordosis is a risk factor for lumbar spondylolysis in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 47(1):76–81
Kawkabani G, Saliby RM, Mekhael M et al (2021) Gait kinematic alterations in subjects with adult spinal deformity and their radiological determinants. Gait Posture 88:203–209
Karademìr M, Karavelioğlu E, Boyaci MG et al (2014) Omurgada sagittal dengenin önemi ve spinopelvik parametreler. J Turkish Spinal Surg 25(2):139–148
Berlemann U et al (1999) The role of lumbar lordosis, vertebral end-plate inclination, disc height, and facet orientation in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Clin Spine Surg 12(1):68–73
Adams MA, Mannion AF, Dolan P (1999) Personal risk factors for first-time low back pain. Spine 24(23):2497
Booth KC et al (1999) Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine 24(16):1712
Been E, Kalichman L (2014) Lumbar lordosis. Spine J 14(1):87–97
Schwab F et al (2009) P26 Pre-operative pelvic parameters must be considered to achieve adequate sagittal balance after lumbar osteotomy. Spine J 9(10):129S
Russell BS, Muhlenkamp-Wermert KA, Hoiriis KT (2020) Measurement of lumbar Lordosis: a comparison of 2 alternatives to the cobb angle. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 43(8):760–767
Hong JY et al (2010) Reliability analysis for radiographic measures of lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis: a case–control study comparing 6 methods. Eur Spine J 19:1551–1557
Lee JS et al (2013) Radiographic measurement reliability of lumbar lordosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 22:813–818
Berlemann U et al (1998) Facet joint remodeling in degenerative spondylolisthesis: an investigation of joint orientation and tropism. Eur Spine J 7:376–380
Vrtovec T, Pernuš F, Likar B (2009) A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature. Eur Spine J 18:593–607
Celestre PC, Dimar JR, Glassman SD (2018) Spinopelvic parameters: lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope: what does a spine surgeon need to know to plan a lumbar deformity correction? Neurosurg Clin N Am 29(3):323–329
Anderson ROBERT (1999) Human evolution, low back pain. Evolut Med 17:333
Lang-Tapia M, España-Romero V, Anelo J et al (2011) Differences on spinal curvature in standing position by gender, age and weight status using a noninvasive method. J Appl Biomech 27:143–150
Gelb DE et al (1995) An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 20(12):1351–1358
Legaye J et al (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7:99–103
Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R et al (2001) Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods. Spine 26:E235-242
Korovessis P, Stamatakis M, Baikousis A (1999) Segmental roentgenographic analysis of vertebral inclination on sagittal plane in asymptomatic versus chronic low back pain patients. J Spinal Disord 12(2):131–137
Korovessis PG, Stamatakis MV, Baikousis AG (1998) Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in the sagittal plane in an asymptomatic Greek population. Spine 23(6):700–704
Gülru ESEN et al (2020) Sağlıklı yetişkinlerde lumbal lordoz ve lumbosakral bölgenin fizyolojik sagital indeks değerleri. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 6(3):343–356
Vialle RAPHAËL et al (2005) Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. JBJS 87(2):260–267
Patrick N, Emanski E, Knaub MA (2014) Acute and chronic low back pain. Med Clin 98(4):777–789
Chen YL (1999) Centroid measurement of lumbar lordosis compared with the Cobb technique. Spine 24:1786–1790
Okpala FO (2018) Comparison of four radiographic angular measures of lumbar lordosis. J Neurosci Rural Pract 09(03):298–304
Chernukha KV, Daffner RH, Reigel DH (1998) Lumbar lordosis measurement A new method versus Cobb technique. Spine 23:74–79
OKCU G et al. (2000) Lomber Omurganın Sagittal planda radyolojik analizi
Demir M et al (2018) Radiographic analysis of the lumbar and sacral region angles in young Turkish adults. J Pak Med Assoc 68(8):1212–1216
Jackson RP, McManus AC (1994) Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine 19(14):1611–1618
Araújo F et al (2014) Individual and contextual characteristics as determinants of sagittal standing posture: a population-based study of adults. Spine J 14(10):2373–2383
Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Instr Course Lect 5:261–275
Janik TJ et al (1998) Can the sagittal lumbar curvature be closely approximated by an ellipse? J Orthop Res 16(6):766–770
Chen Y, Chen W, Chiou W (2007) An alternative method for measuring scoliosis curvature. Orthopedics-New Jersey- 30(10):828
Ferguson AB (1930) Study and treatment of scoliosis. South M J 23:116

Auteurs

Mustafa Tekeli (M)

Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Nigde Omer Halisdemir University, Nigde, Turkey.

Huseyin Erdem (H)

Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.

Nazire Kilic (N)

Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.

Neslihan Boyan (N)

Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.

Ozkan Oguz (O)

Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey. ozoguz@cu.edu.tr.

Roger W Soames (RW)

Centre for Anatomy and Human Identification, School of Science and Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH