The use of alternatives assessment in chemicals management policies: Needs for greater impact.
Alternatives assessment
Chemicals management
Informed substitution
Regulations
Journal
Integrated environmental assessment and management
ISSN: 1551-3793
Titre abrégé: Integr Environ Assess Manag
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101234521
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Sep 2023
01 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
05
02
2023
accepted:
02
08
2023
pubmed:
2
9
2023
medline:
2
9
2023
entrez:
1
9
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Alternatives assessment is a methodology used to identify, evaluate, and compare potential chemical and nonchemical solutions with a substance of concern. It is required in several chemicals management regulatory frameworks, with the objective of supporting the transition to safer chemistry and avoiding regrettable substitutions. Using expert input from symposium presentations and a discussion group hosted by the Association for the Advancement of Alternatives Assessment, four case examples of the use of alternatives assessment in regulatory frameworks were evaluated and compared: (1) the US Environmental Protection Agency Significant New Alternatives Policy (USEPA SNAP), (2) authorization provisions in the EU REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals) regulation, (3) the California (CA) Safer Consumer Products (SCP) Program, and (4) the Safer Products for Washington (WA) Program. Factors such as the purpose of the alternatives assessment, the timeline of actions, who completes the assessment, the role of stakeholder engagement, and the regulatory response options for each policy are outlined. Through these presentations and expert discussions, four lessons learned about the use of alternatives assessments in regulatory policy emerged: (1) the goal and purpose of the regulatory framework significantly affects its ability to result in safer substitution, (2) existing frameworks struggle with data access and insufficient stakeholder engagement, (3) some frameworks lack clear decision rules regarding what is a safer and feasible alternative, and (4) regulatory response options provide limited authority for enforcement and do not adequately address options where alternatives are unavailable or limited. Five recommendations address these lessons as well as how the application of alternatives assessment in regulatory settings could have greater impact in the future. This synthesis is not meant to be a comprehensive policy analysis, but rather an assessment based on the perspectives from experts in the field, which should be supplemented by formal policy analysis as policies are implemented over time. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2023;00:1-11. © 2023 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
Références
Ashford, P. (2021, October 27). Reflections on the EU's chemical strategy for sustainability and its likely impact on the outlook of chemical users [Conference presentation]. A4 International Symposium on Alternatives Assessment, Virtual. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JYTlWz1nSo&list=PLYVFbQINcuXdeapMELpkrik-Uun7dY9cK&index=5
Association for the Advancement of Alternatives Assessment (A4). (2021, October 25-29). 2021 International symposium on alternatives assessment: Accelerating safer and sustainable alternatives. https://saferalternatives.org/past-events/2021-a4-symposium
BASF Canada. (n.d.). reciChain|Reducing plastic waste. Canada Sustainability. https://www.basf.com/ca/en/who-we-are/sustainability/Sustainability-in-Canada/reciChain.html
Blum, A., Behl, M., Birnbaum, L. S., Diamond, M., Phillips, A. L., Singla, V., Sipes, N. S., Stapleton, H. M., & Venier, M. (2019). Organophosphate ester flame retardants: Are they a regrettable substitution for polybrominated diphenyl ethers. Environmental Science and Technology Letters, 6(11), 638-649. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00582
Bunke, D., Löw, C., Moch, K., & Reihlen, A. (2021, August). Advancing REACH-REACH and substitution, on behalf of the German Environment Agency (Report No. FB000108/ENG,ZW,10).
California Department of Toxic Substances Control (CA DTSC). (2020, July). Alternatives analysis guide Version 1.1. https://dtsc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2016/01/AA-Guide-Version-1-0_June-2017.pdf
California Department of Toxic Substances Control (CA DTSC). (2022). Safer consumer products program overview. https://dtsc.ca.gov/scp/safer-consumer-products-program-overview/
ChemChain. (n.d.). Track chemicals along the value chain. https://chemcha.in/
ClientEarth & ChemSec. (2018, March). How to find and analyse alternatives in the authorisation process. ClientEarth/ChemSEC, International Chemical Secretariat. https://chemsec.org/app/uploads/2018/03/180612-Alternatives-in-the-authorisation-process.pdf
Davies, H. (2021, October 25-29). Safer products for Washington: Identifying safer, feasible, and available alternatives to priority chemicals in products [Conference presentation]. International Symposium on Alternatives Assessment [Virtual].
Drohmann, D., & Hernández, F. (2020). Risk of regrettable substitution under EU REACH: Level playing field in the EU regulatory context. International Chemical Regulatory and Law Review, 3(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.21552/icrl/2020/1/6
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). (2020). Impacts of REACH restriction and authorisation on substitution in the EU (ECHA-20-R-09-EN). https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/24152346/impact_rest_auth_on_substitution_en.pdf/7c95222f-5f84-57f7-4cba-65b8463c79d4
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). (2021a). Socio-economic impacts of REACH authorisations.aA meta-analysis of the state of play of applications for authorisation. Retrieved February 1, 2023, from: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/17229/socioeconomic_impact_reach_authorisations_en.pdf/12a126f2-9267-1dcd-75e3-ce0f072918e4?t=1619782167012
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). (2021b). Guidance on the Preparation of an Application for Authorisation (ECHA-11-G-01-EN). https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13643/authorisation_application_en.pdf/8f8fdb30-707b-4b2f-946f-f4405c64cdc7
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). (2022). Changes of market volumes of chemicals subject to authorisation in 2010-21. https://doi.org/10.2823/844275
Retrieved February 1, 2023, from: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/2082415/change_of_tonnage_of_axiv_substances_2010_21_en.pdf/fe2ac921-8d75-34f8-d3ea-53fff665ea69?t=1666079838875
European Commission. (2020). Chemicals strategy for sustainability: Towards a toxic-free environment. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/pdf/chemicals/2020/10/Strategy.pdf
European Court of Justice. (2021, February). Sweden v. European Commission, (Appeal-Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006-Registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals-European Commission decision authorising certain uses of lead sulfochromate yellow and lead chromate molybdate sulfate red, substances listed in Annex XIV of that regulation-Substances of very high concern-Conditions of authorisation-Assessment of the lack of suitable alternatives) (In Case C-389/19 P). https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=238162&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=1452930
Geiser, K., Tickner, J., Edwards, S., & Rossi, M. (2015). The architecture of chemical alternatives assessment. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 35(12), 2152-2161. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12507
Grant, K. A., Wong, L., Meng, Q., Lee, H. J., Phelps, D. S., Davis, S. L., Salinas, M., Luan, T., & Zhou, X. (2021). Informed substitution of hazardous chemicals through the lens of California's safer consumer products alternatives analysis-Best practices, challenges, and opportunities. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 18(4), 1007-1019. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4527
Jacobs, M. M., Malloy, T. F., Tickner, J. A., & Edwards, S. (2016). Alternatives assessment frameworks: Research needs for the informed substitution of hazardous chemicals. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(3), 265-280. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409581
Heine, L., & Nestler, A. (2019). Promising practices for alternatives assessment: Lessons from a case study of copper-free antifouling coatings. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 15(6), 867-879. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4165
Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse (IC2). (2017). Alternatives Assessment Guide Version, 1, 1.
Moon, M. K. (2019). Concern about the safety of bisphenol A substitutes. Diabetes & Metabolism Journal, 43(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2019.0027
National Resources Defense Council (NRDC). (2017). Selecting safer alternatives to toxic chemicals and ensuring the protection of the most vulnerable: A discussion draft (Report 17-04-A). https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/toxic-chemicals-vulnerable-populations-report.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Guidance on Key Considerations for the Identification and Selection of Safer Alternatives. Series on Risk Management No. 60. Environment, Health and Safety, Environment Directorate OECD.
Protection of Stratospheric Ozone. (1994, March). Final Rule, 59 Fed. Reg 13044 (to be codified at 40 CFR §§ 82.170-82.184).
Revised Code of Washington (RCW). (2019). Pollution Prevention for Healthy People and Puget Sound Act. C 292 § 14.
Romano, D. (2021, October 27). Reflecting on the use of alternatives assessment in policy in Europe [Conference presentation]. A4 International Symposium on Alternatives Assessment, Virtual. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMbYy641QX8&list=PLYVFbQINcuXdeapMELpkrik-UUn7dY9cK&index=4
Rudisill, C., Ashford, P., Rossi, M., Zhou, X., Davies, H., & Romano, D. (2021, October 27). Session 3-Alternatives assessment and informed substitution in policy, part 1: Lessons learned and insights for future policy provisions [Conference panel discussion]. A4 International Symposium on Alternatives Assessment, Virtual. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMbYy641QX8&list=PLYVFbQINcuXdeapMELpkrik-UUn7dY9cK&index=4
Sackmann, K., Reemtsma, T., Rahmberg, M., & Bunke, D. (2018). Impact of European chemicals regulation on the industrial use of plasticizers and patterns of substitution in Scandinavia. Environment International, 119, 346-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.06.037
Senate Bill (SB) 502. (2022). Chapter 701. Hazardous materials: Green chemistry: Consumer products.
Slunge, D., Andersson, I., & Sterner, T. (2022). REACH authorisation and the substitution of hazardous chemicals: The case of trichloroethylene. Journal of Cleaner Production, 364, 132637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132637
Solomon, G. M., Hoang, A., & Reynolds, P. (2019). The California Safer Consumer Products Program: Evaluating a novel chemical policy strategy. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy: NS, 29(2), 224-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1048291119850105
Sustainable Chemistry Catalyst. (2022, July). Guidance for evaluating the performance of alternatives: Fit-for-purpose performance (Version 1.0). https://static1.squarespace.com/static/633b3dd6649ed62926ed7271/t/6348389b52e34a1aee404c99/1665677467889/AA-Assessment-Guidance-Fit-for-Performance-2022.pdf
Tickner, J., Jacobs, M., & Mack, N. B. (2018). Assessment of chemical and non-chemical alternatives: Focusing on solutions. Foundation paper for a Global Chemicals Outlook II chapter. Lowell Center for Sustainable Production. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/32618/Tickner.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Tickner, J., Jacobs, M. M., & Mack, N. B. (2019). Alternatives assessment and informed substitution: A global landscape assessment of drivers, methods, policies and needs. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 13, 100161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2019.100161
Tickner, J., Simon, R., Jacobs, M., Rudisill, C., Tanir, J., Heine, L., Spencer, P., Fantke, P., Malloy, T., Edwards, S., & Zhou, X. (2019). Lessons from the 2018 International Symposium on Alternatives Assessment: Advances and reflections on practice and ongoing needs to build the field. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 15(6), 909-916. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4213
Tickner, J. A., Schifano, J. N., Blake, A., Rudisill, C., & Mulvihill, M. J. (2015). Advancing safer alternatives through functional substitution. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(2), 742-749. https://doi.org/10.1021/es503328m
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2021). The Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program. Information Notice Instruction Manual (EPA Form No. 1264-14, July). https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-09/documents/snapinformationnoticeinstructions2014.pdf
United States National Research Council (US NRC). (2014). A framework to guide selection of chemical alternatives. The National Academies Press.
Washington State Department of Ecology (WA Ecology). (2022). Regulatory determinations report to the legislature: Safer products for Washington Cycle 1 Implementation Phase 3 (Publication 22-04-018). https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/publications/documents/2204018.pdf
Washington State Department of Ecology (WA Ecology). (2023). Safer products for Washington. https://ecology.wa.gov/Waste-Toxics/Reducing-toxic-chemicals/Washington-s-toxics-in-products-laws/Safer-Products-for-Washington
William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021. (2021). H.R.6395-116th Congress (2019-2020). Public Law No: 116-283. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6395
Zhou, X., Grant, K., & Lee, H. (2021, October 25-29). Lessons learned and first experiences from CA safer consumer products alternatives analysis [Conference presentation]. International Symposium on Alternatives Assessment [Virtual], 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMbYy641QX8&list=PLYVFbQINcuXdeapMELpkrik-UUn7dY9cK&index=4&t=259s