Studying temporal titre evolution of commercial SARS-CoV-2 assays reveals significant shortcomings of using BAU standardization for comparison.
Antibody
Binding antibody units
COVID-19
Nucleocapsid
RBD
SARS-CoV-2
Serology
Spike
Journal
Virology journal
ISSN: 1743-422X
Titre abrégé: Virol J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101231645
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2023
01 09 2023
Historique:
received:
14
11
2022
accepted:
24
08
2023
medline:
5
9
2023
pubmed:
2
9
2023
entrez:
1
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Measuring specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies has become one of the main epidemiological tools to survey the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, but also vaccination response. The WHO made available a set of well-characterized samples derived from recovered individuals to allow normalization between different quantitative anti-Spike assays to defined Binding Antibody Units (BAU). To assess sero-responses longitudinally, a cohort of ninety-nine SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive subjects was followed up together with forty-five vaccinees without previous infection but with two vaccinations. Sero-responses were evaluated using a total of six different assays: four measuring anti-Spike proteins (converted to BAU), one measuring anti-Nucleocapsid proteins and one SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization. Both cohorts were evaluated using the Euroimmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA anti-S1 IgG and the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 anti-S1 assay. In SARS-CoV-2-convalesce subjects, the BAU-sero-responses of Euroimmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA anti-S1 IgG and Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 anti-S1 peaked both at 47 (43-51) days, the first assay followed by a slow decay thereafter (> 208 days), while the second assay not presenting any decay within one year. Both assay values in BAUs are only equivalent a few months after infection, elsewhere correction factors up to 10 are necessary. In contrast, in infection-naive vaccinees the assays perform similarly. The results of our study suggest that the establishment of a protective correlate or vaccination booster recommendation based on different assays, although BAU-standardised, is still challenging. At the moment the characteristics of the available assays used are not related, and the BAU-standardisation is unable to correct for that.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Measuring specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies has become one of the main epidemiological tools to survey the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, but also vaccination response. The WHO made available a set of well-characterized samples derived from recovered individuals to allow normalization between different quantitative anti-Spike assays to defined Binding Antibody Units (BAU).
METHODS
To assess sero-responses longitudinally, a cohort of ninety-nine SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive subjects was followed up together with forty-five vaccinees without previous infection but with two vaccinations. Sero-responses were evaluated using a total of six different assays: four measuring anti-Spike proteins (converted to BAU), one measuring anti-Nucleocapsid proteins and one SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization. Both cohorts were evaluated using the Euroimmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA anti-S1 IgG and the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 anti-S1 assay.
RESULTS
In SARS-CoV-2-convalesce subjects, the BAU-sero-responses of Euroimmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA anti-S1 IgG and Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 anti-S1 peaked both at 47 (43-51) days, the first assay followed by a slow decay thereafter (> 208 days), while the second assay not presenting any decay within one year. Both assay values in BAUs are only equivalent a few months after infection, elsewhere correction factors up to 10 are necessary. In contrast, in infection-naive vaccinees the assays perform similarly.
CONCLUSION
The results of our study suggest that the establishment of a protective correlate or vaccination booster recommendation based on different assays, although BAU-standardised, is still challenging. At the moment the characteristics of the available assays used are not related, and the BAU-standardisation is unable to correct for that.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37658454
doi: 10.1186/s12985-023-02167-z
pii: 10.1186/s12985-023-02167-z
pmc: PMC10474769
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
200Investigateurs
Emad Alamoudi
(E)
Jared Anderson
(J)
Valeria Baldassarre
(V)
Maximilian Baumann
(M)
Marc Becker
(M)
Franziska Bednarski
(F)
Marieke Behlen
(M)
Olimbek Bemirayev
(O)
Jessica Beyerl
(J)
Patrick Bitzer
(P)
Rebecca Böhnlein
(R)
Isabel Brand
(I)
Anna Brauer
(A)
Vera Britz
(V)
Franziska Bünz
(F)
Friedrich Caroli
(F)
Josephine Coleman
(J)
Lorenzo Contento
(L)
Alina Czwienzek
(A)
Flora Deák
(F)
Maximilian N Diefenbach
(MN)
Jana Diekmannshemke
(J)
Anna Do
(A)
Gerhard Dobler
(G)
Jürgen Durner
(J)
Tabea Eser
(T)
Ute Eberle
(U)
Judith Eckstein
(J)
Manuela Feyereisen
(M)
Volker Fingerle
(V)
Stefanie Fischer
(S)
Felix Forster
(F)
Günter Fröschl
(G)
Christiane Fuchs
(C)
Otto Geisenberger
(O)
Mercè Garí
(M)
Marius Gasser
(M)
Sonja Gauder
(S)
Raffaela Geier
(R)
Kristina Gillig
(K)
Keisha Gezgin
(K)
Leonard Gilberg
(L)
Kristina Gillig
(K)
Philipp Girl
(P)
Elias Golschan
(E)
Vitus Grauvogl
(V)
Jessica Michelle Guggenbuehl Noller
(JMG)
Elena Maria Guglielmini
(EM)
Pablo Gutierrez
(P)
Anslem Haderer
(A)
Celina Halfmann
(C)
Marlene Hannes
(M)
Lena Hartinger
(L)
Timm Haselwarter
(T)
Jan Hasenauer
(J)
Alejandra Hernandez
(A)
Luca Heller
(L)
Arlett Heiber
(A)
Matthias Herrmann
(M)
Leah Hillari
(L)
Stefan Hillmann
(S)
Christian Hinske
(C)
Janna Hoefflin
(J)
Tim Hofberger
(T)
Michael Höfinger
(M)
Larissa Hofmann
(L)
Kristina Huber
(K)
Christian Janke
(C)
Lilian Karger
(L)
Ursula Kappl
(U)
Antonia Keßler
(A)
Zohaib Khan
(Z)
Charlotte Kiani
(C)
Isabel Klugherz
(I)
Norah Kreider
(N)
Johanna Kresin
(J)
Arne Kroidl
(A)
Pratik Kunder
(P)
Magdalena Lang
(M)
Clemens Lang
(C)
Silvan Lange
(S)
Ekaterina Lapteva
(E)
Michael Laxy
(M)
Ronan Le Gleut
(R)
Reiner Leidl
(R)
Leopold Liedl
(L)
Felix Lindner
(F)
Xhovana Lucaj
(X)
Elisabeth Lucke
(E)
Fabian Luppa
(F)
Alexandra Sophie Nafziger
(AS)
Alexander Maczka
(A)
Petra Mang
(P)
Paula Matcau
(P)
Rebecca Mayrhofer
(R)
Anna-Maria Mekota
(AM)
Dafni Metaxa
(D)
Emily Mohr
(E)
Hannah Müller
(H)
Katharina Müller
(K)
Nathalia Nascimento
(N)
Kasimir Niermeyer
(K)
Sophia Nikolaides
(S)
Ivan Noreña
(I)
Leonie Pattard
(L)
Michael Plank
(M)
Claire Pleimelding
(C)
Michel Pletschette
(M)
Viona Poll
(V)
Stephan Prückner
(S)
Konstantin Pusl
(K)
Peter Pütz
(P)
Katja Radon
(K)
Elba Raimúndez
(E)
Julius Raschka
(J)
Christina Reinkemeyer
(C)
Camilla Rothe
(C)
Viktoria Ruci
(V)
Nicole Schäfer
(N)
Yannik Schälte
(Y)
Paul Schandelmaier
(P)
Benedikt Schluse
(B)
Annika Schneider
(A)
Lara Schneider
(L)
Sophie Schultz
(S)
Mirjam Schunk
(M)
Lars Schwettmann
(L)
Josefin Sedlmeier
(J)
Linda Sintu-Sempta
(L)
Alba Soler
(A)
Peter Sothmann
(P)
Katharina Strobl
(K)
Aida Strüber
(A)
Laura Strüber
(L)
Jeni Tang
(J)
Fabian Theis
(F)
Verena Thiel
(V)
Eva Thumser
(E)
Niklas Thur
(N)
Sophie Thiesbrummel
(S)
Julian Ullrich
(J)
Vincent Vollmayr
(V)
Emilia Von Lovenberg
(E)
Jonathan Von Lovenberg
(J)
Carsten Vos
(C)
Julia Waibel
(J)
Claudia Wallrauch
(C)
Nikolas Weigl
(N)
Roman Wölfl
(R)
Julia Wolff
(J)
Pia Wullinger
(P)
Tobias Würfel
(T)
Patrick Wustrow
(P)
Sabine Zange
(S)
Eleftheria Zeggini
(E)
Thorbjörn Zimmer
(T)
Thomas Zimmermann
(T)
Lea Zuche
(L)
Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Viruses. 2020 Nov 27;12(12):
pubmed: 33260809
Lancet. 2021 Jan 9;397(10269):99-111
pubmed: 33306989
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1412-1423
pubmed: 33626250
J Gen Virol. 2021 Oct;102(10):
pubmed: 34623233
Nat Med. 2021 Jul;27(7):1147-1148
pubmed: 34239135
Lancet. 2021 Apr 10;397(10282):1347-1348
pubmed: 33770519
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):e192-e197
pubmed: 32539990
Infect Dis Ther. 2021 Jun 16;:1-14
pubmed: 34155471
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 14;385(16):1474-1484
pubmed: 34320281
Nat Med. 2021 Nov;27(11):2032-2040
pubmed: 34588689
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 9;385(24):e83
pubmed: 34614327
Lancet. 2022 Mar 5;399(10328):924-944
pubmed: 35202601
J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb 13;223(3):389-398
pubmed: 33140086
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 29;383(18):1724-1734
pubmed: 32871063
J Clin Virol. 2022 Jan;146:105052
pubmed: 34920374
Lancet. 2021 Jul 31;398(10298):385-387
pubmed: 34274038
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1200-1204
pubmed: 32555424
Nat Commun. 2021 Nov 4;12(1):6379
pubmed: 34737312
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2212-2218
pubmed: 33882219
Microorganisms. 2021 Mar 08;9(3):
pubmed: 33800489
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):845-848
pubmed: 32350462
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Dec;5(12):1598-1607
pubmed: 33106674
Sci Adv. 2021 Sep 03;7(36):eabj5365
pubmed: 34516917
Immunity. 2020 Nov 17;53(5):925-933.e4
pubmed: 33129373
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 9;385(24):e84
pubmed: 34614326
Sci Immunol. 2020 Dec 7;5(54):
pubmed: 33288645
Virology. 2022 Apr;569:37-43
pubmed: 35245784
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 11;384(6):533-540
pubmed: 33369366
Eur J Immunol. 2020 Dec;50(12):2025-2040
pubmed: 33084029
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416
pubmed: 33378609
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Jul;9(7):712-720
pubmed: 33865504
Science. 2021 Feb 5;371(6529):
pubmed: 33408181
Euro Surveill. 2021 Jul;26(30):
pubmed: 34328074
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020 Sep 2;5(1):180
pubmed: 32879307
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 10;383(11):1085-1087
pubmed: 32706954
Lancet. 2021 May 15;397(10287):1819-1829
pubmed: 33964222
J Infect. 2021 May;82(5):162-169
pubmed: 33766553
Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):205-211
pubmed: 33469205
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
Nat Med. 2021 Sep;27(9):1525-1529
pubmed: 34262158
Nat Med. 2021 Dec;27(12):2136-2143
pubmed: 34728831