Craving modulates attentional bias towards alcohol in severe alcohol use disorder: An eye-tracking study.

Alcohol alcohol use disorder attentional bias avoidance bias cognitive load eye-tracking

Journal

Addiction (Abingdon, England)
ISSN: 1360-0443
Titre abrégé: Addiction
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9304118

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 14 02 2023
accepted: 19 07 2023
medline: 4 9 2023
pubmed: 4 9 2023
entrez: 2 9 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Competing models disagree on three theoretical questions regarding alcohol-related attentional bias (AB), a key process in severe alcohol use disorder (SAUD): (1) is AB more of a trait (fixed, associated with alcohol use severity) or state (fluid, associated with momentary craving states) characteristic of SAUD; (2) does AB purely reflect the over-activation of the reflexive/reward system or is it also influenced by the activity of the reflective/control system and (3) does AB rely upon early or later processing stages? We addressed these issues by investigating the time-course of AB and its modulation by subjective craving and cognitive load in SAUD. A free-viewing eye-tracking task, presenting pictures of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, combined with a concurrent cognitive task with three difficulty levels. A laboratory setting in the detoxification units of three Belgian hospitals. We included 30 patients with SAUD self-reporting craving at testing time, 30 patients with SAUD reporting a total absence of craving and 30 controls matched on sex and age. All participants from SAUD groups met the DSM-5 criteria for SAUD. We assessed AB through early and late eye-tracking indices. We evaluated the modulation of AB by craving (comparison between patients with/without craving) and cognitive load (variation of AB with the difficulty level of the concurrent task). Dwell time measure indicated that SAUD patients with craving allocated more attention towards alcohol-related stimuli than patients without craving (P < 0.001, d = 1.093), resulting in opposite approach/avoidance AB according to craving presence/absence. SAUD patients without craving showed a stronger avoidance AB than controls (P = 0.003, d = 0.806). AB did not vary according to cognitive load (P = 0.962, η The direction of alcohol-related attentional bias (approach/avoidance) appears to be determined by patients' subjective craving at testing time and does not function as a stable trait of severe alcohol use disorder. Alcohol-related attentional bias appears to rely on later/controlled attentional stages but is not modulated by the saturation of the reflective/control system.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OBJECTIVE
Competing models disagree on three theoretical questions regarding alcohol-related attentional bias (AB), a key process in severe alcohol use disorder (SAUD): (1) is AB more of a trait (fixed, associated with alcohol use severity) or state (fluid, associated with momentary craving states) characteristic of SAUD; (2) does AB purely reflect the over-activation of the reflexive/reward system or is it also influenced by the activity of the reflective/control system and (3) does AB rely upon early or later processing stages? We addressed these issues by investigating the time-course of AB and its modulation by subjective craving and cognitive load in SAUD.
DESIGN METHODS
A free-viewing eye-tracking task, presenting pictures of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, combined with a concurrent cognitive task with three difficulty levels.
SETTING METHODS
A laboratory setting in the detoxification units of three Belgian hospitals.
PARTICIPANTS METHODS
We included 30 patients with SAUD self-reporting craving at testing time, 30 patients with SAUD reporting a total absence of craving and 30 controls matched on sex and age. All participants from SAUD groups met the DSM-5 criteria for SAUD.
MEASUREMENTS METHODS
We assessed AB through early and late eye-tracking indices. We evaluated the modulation of AB by craving (comparison between patients with/without craving) and cognitive load (variation of AB with the difficulty level of the concurrent task).
FINDINGS RESULTS
Dwell time measure indicated that SAUD patients with craving allocated more attention towards alcohol-related stimuli than patients without craving (P < 0.001, d = 1.093), resulting in opposite approach/avoidance AB according to craving presence/absence. SAUD patients without craving showed a stronger avoidance AB than controls (P = 0.003, d = 0.806). AB did not vary according to cognitive load (P = 0.962, η
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The direction of alcohol-related attentional bias (approach/avoidance) appears to be determined by patients' subjective craving at testing time and does not function as a stable trait of severe alcohol use disorder. Alcohol-related attentional bias appears to rely on later/controlled attentional stages but is not modulated by the saturation of the reflective/control system.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37658786
doi: 10.1111/add.16333
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Références

Bechara A. Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1458-1463.
Volkow ND, Michaelides M, Baler R. The neuroscience of drug reward and addiction. Physiol Rev. 2019;99:2115-2140.
Yücel M, Oldenhof E, Ahmed SH, Belin D, Billieux J, Bowden-Jones H, et al. A transdiagnostic dimensional approach towards a neuropsychological assessment for addiction: an international Delphi consensus study: transdiagnostic neuropsychological approaches to addiction. Addiction. 2019;114:1095-1109.
Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev. 1993;8:247-291.
Cox WM, Fadardi JS, Intriligator JM, Klinger E. Attentional bias modification for addictive behaviors: clinical implications. CNS Spectr. 2014;19:215-224.
Rinck M, Wiers RW, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Relapse prevention in abstinent alcoholics by cognitive bias modification: clinical effects of combining approach bias modification and attention bias modification. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018;86:1005-1016.
Hardman CA, Jones A, Burton S, Duckworth JJ, McGale LS, Mead BR, et al. Food-related attentional bias and its associations with appetitive motivation and body weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Appetite. 2021;157:104986.
Hofmann W, Friese M, Wiers RW. Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: a theoretical framework and empirical review. Health Psychol Rev. 2008;2:111-137.
Field M, Werthmann J, Franken I, Hofmann W, Hogarth L, Roefs A. The role of attentional bias in obesity and addiction. Health Psychol. 2016;35:767-780.
Christiansen P, Schoenmakers TM, Field M. Less than meets the eye: reappraising the clinical relevance of attentional bias in addiction. Addict Behav. 2015;44:43-50.
Field M, Marhe R, Franken IHA. The clinical relevance of attentional bias in substance use disorders. CNS Spectr. 2014;19:225-230.
Field M, Mogg K, Mann B, Bennett GA, Bradley BP. Attentional biases in abstinent alcoholics and their association with craving. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013;27:71-80.
Sinclair JMA, Garner M, Pasche SC, Wood TB, Baldwin DS. Attentional biases in patients with alcohol dependence: influence of coexisting psychopathology. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2016;31:395-401.
Ataya AF, Adams S, Mullings E, Cooper RM, Attwood AS, Munafò MR. Internal reliability of measures of substance-related cognitive bias. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;121:148-151.
Bollen Z, Field M, Billaux P, Maurage P. Attentional bias in alcohol drinkers: a systematic review of its link with consumption variables. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;139:104703.
Bollen Z, Pabst A, Masson N, Billaux P, D'Hondt F, Deleuze J, et al. Alcohol-related attentional biases in recently detoxified inpatients with severe alcohol use disorder: an eye-tracking approach. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;225:108803.
Wiers RW, Bartholow BD, van den Wildenberg E, Thush C, Engels RCME, Sher KJ et al. Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: a review and a model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2007;86:263-283.
Strack F, Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8:220-247.
Fadardi JS, Cox WM. Alcohol attentional bias: drinking salience or cognitive impairment? Psychopharmacology. 2006;185:169-178.
van Hemel-Ruiter ME, Wiers RW, Brook FG, de Jong PJ. Attentional bias and executive control in treatment-seeking substance-dependent adolescents: a cross-sectional and follow-up study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;159:133-141.
Heeren A, Billieux J, Philippot P, de Raedt R, Baeken C, de Timary P, et al. Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on attentional bias for threat: a proof-of-concept study among individuals with social anxiety disorder. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017;12:251-260.
Judah MR, Grant DM, Lechner WV, Mills AC. Working memory load moderates late attentional bias in social anxiety. Cogn Emot. 2013;27:502-511.
Liu S, Lane SD, Schmitz JM, Waters AJ, Cunningham KA, Moeller FG. Relationship between attentional bias to cocaine-related stimuli and impulsivity in cocaine-dependent subjects. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2011;37:117-122.
Schoenmakers TM, de Bruin M, Lux IFM, Goertz AG, Van Kerkhof DHAT, Wiers RW. Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;109:30-36.
McAteer CD, Hanna D. Alcohol attention bias in adolescent social drinkers: an eye tracking study. Psychopharmacology. 2015;232:3183-3191.
McAteer HD, Curran D. Age-related differences in alcohol attention bias: a cross-sectional study. Psychopharmacology. 2018;235:2387-2393.
Monem RG, Fillmore MT. Measuring heightened attention to alcohol in a naturalistic setting: a validation study. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017;25:496-502.
Babor TF, Robaina K. The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): a review of graded severity algorithms and national adaptations. Int J Alcohol Drug Res. 2016;5:17-24.
Singleton EG. Alcohol Craving Questionnaire, Short-Form (Revised; ACQ-SF-R): background, scoring, and administration. Baltimore, MD, USA; 1995.
Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown G. Beck Depression Inventory-II Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1996.
Bruchon-Schweitzer M, Paulhan I. Adaptation francophone de l'inventaire d'anxiété Trait-Etat (Forme Y) de Spielberger [French adaptation of the Anxiety Inventory State-Trait Form Y of C. D. Spielberger] Paris, France: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée; 1993.
Billieux J, Rochat L, Ceschi G, Carré A, Offerlin-Meyer I, Defeldre AC, et al. Validation of a short French version of the UPPS-P impulsive behavior scale. Compr Psychiatry. 2012;53:609-615.
Mathôt S, Schreij D, Theeuwes J. OpenSesame: an open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2012;44:314-324.
Soleymani A, Ivanov Y, Mathot S, de Jong PJ. Free-viewing multi-stimulus eye tracking task to index attention bias for alcohol versus soda cues: satisfactory reliability and criterion validity. Addict Behav. 2020;100:106117.
Pronk T, van Deursen DS, Beraha EM, Larsen H, Wiers RW. Validation of the Amsterdam beverage picture set: a controlled picture set for cognitive bias measurement and modification paradigms. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015;39:2047-2055.
Andres M, Salvaggio S, Lefèvre N, Pesenti M, Masson N. Semantic associations between arithmetic and space: evidence from temporal order judgements. Mem Cognit. 2020;48:361-369.
den Uyl TE, Gladwin TE, Lindenmeyer J, Wiers RW. A clinical trial with combined transcranial direct current stimulation and attentional bias modification in alcohol-dependent patients. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018;42:1961-1969.
Fridrici C, Driessen M, Wingenfeld K, Kremer G, Kissler J, Beblo T. Investigating biases of attention and memory for alcohol-related and negative words in alcohol-dependents with and without major depression after day-clinic treatment. Psychiatry Res. 2014;218:311-318.
Wiers CE, Gladwin TE, Ludwig VU, Gröpper S, Stuke H, Gawron CK, et al. Comparing three cognitive biases for alcohol cues in alcohol dependence. Alcohol Alcohol. 2016;52:242-248.
Lakens D, Caldwell AR. Simulation-based power analysis for factorial analysis of variance designs. Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. 2021;4:2515245920951503.
Christiansen P, Mansfield R, Duckworth J, Field M, Jones A. Internal reliability of the alcohol-related visual probe task is increased by utilising personalised stimuli and eye-tracking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;155:170-174.
van Ens W, Schmidt U, Campbell IC, Roefs A, Werthmann J. Test-retest reliability of attention bias for food: robust eye-tracking and reaction time indices. Appetite. 2019;136:86-92.
Foulsham T, Gray A, Nasiopoulos E, Kingstone A. Leftward biases in picture scanning and line bisection: a gaze-contingent window study. Vision Res. 2013;78:14-25.
Bollen Z, Masson N, Salvaggio S, D'Hondt F, Maurage P. Craving is everything: an eye-tracking exploration of attentional bias in binge drinking. J Psychopharmacol. 2020;34:636-647.
Beraha EM, Salemink E, Krediet E, Wiers RW. Can baclofen change alcohol-related cognitive biases and what is the role of anxiety herein? J Psychopharmacol. 2018;32:867-875.
Vollstadt-Klein S, Loeber S, von der Goltz C, Mann K, Kiefer F. Avoidance of alcohol-related stimuli increases during the early stage of abstinence in alcohol-dependent patients. Alcohol Alcohol. 2009;44:458-463.
Maurage P, Bollen Z, Masson N, D'Hondt F. Eye tracking studies exploring cognitive and affective processes among alcohol drinkers: a systematic review and perspectives. Neuropsychol Rev. 2020;31:167-201.
Bollen Z, Kauffmann L, Guyader N, Peyrin C, Maurage P. Does alcohol automatically capture drinkers’ attention? Exploration through an eye-tracking saccadic choice task. Psychopharmacology. 2023;240:271-282.
Pennington CR, Jones A, Bartlett JE, Copeland A, Shaw DJ. Raising the bar: improving methodological rigour in cognitive alcohol research. Addiction. 2021;116:3243-3251.
Pennington CR, Qureshi AW, Monk RL, Greenwood K, Heim D. Beer? Over here! Examining attentional bias towards alcoholic and appetitive stimuli in a visual search eye-tracking task. Psychopharmacology. 2019;236:3465-3476.
Skorka-Brown J, Andrade J, Whalley B, May J. Playing Tetris decreases drug and other cravings in real world settings. Addict Behav. 2015;51:165-170.
Wiechert S, Grafton B, MacLeod C, Wiers RW. When alcohol adverts catch the eye: a psychometrically reliable dual-probe measure of attentional bias. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:13263.
Field M, Munafò MR, Franken IHA. A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse. Psychol Bull. 2009;135:589-607.
Milton AL, Everitt BJ. The psychological and neurochemical mechanisms of drug memory reconsolidation: implications for the treatment of addiction: mechanisms of drug memory reconsolidation. Eur J Neurosci. 2010;31:2308-2319.

Auteurs

Zoé Bollen (Z)

Louvain Experimental Psychopathology research group (LEP), Psychological Science Research Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Arthur Pabst (A)

Louvain Experimental Psychopathology research group (LEP), Psychological Science Research Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Nicolas Masson (N)

Numerical Cognition Group, Psychological Science Research Institute and Neuroscience Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Reinout W Wiers (RW)

Addiction Development and Psychopathology (ADAPT)-lab, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Matt Field (M)

Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Pierre Maurage (P)

Louvain Experimental Psychopathology research group (LEP), Psychological Science Research Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH