Simple rules, O-RADS, ADNEX and SRR model: Single oncologic center validation of diagnostic predictive models alone and combined (two-step strategy) to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses and ovarian tumors.

ADNEX O-RADS Ovarian cancer SRR Simple rules Ultrasound

Journal

Gynecologic oncology
ISSN: 1095-6859
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0365304

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 16 06 2023
revised: 02 08 2023
accepted: 21 08 2023
pubmed: 3 9 2023
medline: 3 9 2023
entrez: 3 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To compare performance of Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX model), Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS), Simple Rules Risk (SRR) assessment and the two-step strategy based on the application of Simple Rules (SR) followed by SRR and SR followed by ADNEX in the pre-operative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses (AMs). We conducted a retrospective study from January-2018 to December-2021 in which consecutive patients with at AMs were recruited. Accuracy metrics included sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for ADNEX, O-RADS and SRR. When SR was inconclusive a "two-step strategy" was adopted applying SR + ADNEX model and SR + SRR assessment. A total of 514 women were included, 400 (77.8%) had a benign ovarian tumor and 114 (22.2%) had a malignant tumor. At a threshold malignancy risk of >10%, the SE and SP of ADNEX model, O-RADS and SRR were: 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-0.96) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91); 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.97) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.96-0.92); 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.93) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.87), respectively. When we applied SR, 109 (21.2%) cases resulted inconclusive. The SE and SP of two-step strategy SR + SRR assessment and SR + ADNEX model were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.93) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94), SR + ADNEX model 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.95) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96), respectively. O-RADS presented the highest SE, similar to ADNEX model and SR + ADNEX model. However, the SR + ADNEX model presented the higher performance accuracy with the higher SP and PPV. This two-step strategy, SR and ADNEX model applicated to inconclusive SR, is convenient for clinical evaluation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37660412
pii: S0090-8258(23)01441-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.08.012
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

109-116

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Giulia Spagnol (G)

Department of Women and Children's Health, Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Matteo Marchetti (M)

Department of Women and Children's Health, Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Orazio De Tommasi (O)

Department of Women and Children's Health, Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Amerigo Vitagliano (A)

Department of Biomedical and Human Oncological Science (DIMO), 1st Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari, Policlinico, Bari, Italy.

Francesco Cavallin (F)

Independent Statistician (collaboration with University of Padua), Solagna, Italy.

Roberto Tozzi (R)

Department of Women and Children's Health, Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Carlo Saccardi (C)

Department of Women and Children's Health, Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Marco Noventa (M)

Department of Women and Children's Health, Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. Electronic address: marco.noventa.2@unipd.it.

Classifications MeSH