Primary Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces Using Devascularized Vastus Lateralis Muscle in Sensate Anterolateral Thigh Flap Donor Sites.
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
27
03
2023
accepted:
18
07
2023
medline:
4
9
2023
pubmed:
4
9
2023
entrez:
4
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sensate flaps are increasingly used in diverse areas of plastic surgery. Concurrently, modern techniques in neuroma prevention have emerged, such as regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI). Despite increasing use of sensate flaps, the combined use of donor-site neuroma prevention techniques has yet to be described. We report on the use of primary donor-site RPNI at the time of sensate anterolateral thigh (ALT) reconstructions. In ALT flaps, the vastus lateralis muscle can be segmentally devascularized from perforator dissection. These segments of devascularized vastus lateralis muscle can easily be used and repurposed as the free muscle grafts needed for RPNI, providing a physiologic target for the regenerating neurons. Donor-site neuroma has not been shown to be a significant issue at standard ALT flap donor sites. Sensate ALT flaps involve harvest of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and/or additional femoral sensory branches at a more proximal location close to the level of the anterior superior iliac spine, where injury to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve may be associated with pain. In this series, eight patients underwent senate ALT flaps with the use of primary RPNI at the sensate ALT donor site. At a mean follow-up of 16.3 months (range 5-25 months), there was minimal to no nerve pain and no clinical evidence of donor-site neuroma. As sensate flap reconstructions are increasingly performed in plastic surgery and data on neuroma prevention techniques continue to grow, we propose consideration of their combined use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37662471
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005241
pmc: PMC10473292
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e5241Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.
Références
J Hand Surg Am. 1998 Jan;23(1):70-5
pubmed: 9523958
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Feb;125(2):88e-89e
pubmed: 20124824
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jun;109(7):2219-26; discussion 2227-30
pubmed: 12045540
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep;144(3):421e-430e
pubmed: 31461024
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Feb;115(2):464-70
pubmed: 15692351
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jan;125(1):209-214
pubmed: 19910852
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Mar 25;8(3):e2689
pubmed: 32537346
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Aug 1;148(2):273-284
pubmed: 34398080
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019 Jan 03;6(1):77-85
pubmed: 31069099
Hip Int. 2019 Mar;29(2):161-165
pubmed: 30810069
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jan;139(1):204-211
pubmed: 28027249
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Dec 27;4(12):e1038
pubmed: 28293490
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2016 Jun;32(5):342-57
pubmed: 27144952