What makes women receptive to breast self-examination, animation, or simulation? - a comparative study.
animation video
breast cancer
breast self-examination
simulation models
Journal
Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)
ISSN: 2049-0801
Titre abrégé: Ann Med Surg (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101616869
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
06
03
2023
accepted:
14
05
2023
medline:
4
9
2023
pubmed:
4
9
2023
entrez:
4
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Breast self-examination (BSE) plays an important role in the early diagnosis of breast cancer in India owing to the stigma attached to cancer. The authors compared the efficacies of animation video versus simulation techniques in BSE. Women with no previous history of conditions affecting the breasts were included in this prospective observational study and divided into an animation or simulation arm. The latter was further divided into three subgroups as per the simulation models used : the German (Delta Healthcare), British (Health Edco), and Indian (low-cost, validated) models used for teaching BSE. The hybrid animation video had a 9 min runtime with a lecture on BSE and a virtual character performing BSE. In both the arms, participants filled in a validated modified patient satisfaction questionnaire. A total of 500 women participated. The mean age of the participants in the animation video arm was 20.21±3.88 years and 19.34±2.27, 22.94±9.6, and 18.97±1.31(20.41±5.99) years in the Indian, German, and British simulation models arm, respectively. The age difference between the two arms was statistically significant ( All models had good efficiency and utility as learning tools for BSE. However, large studies in BSE set up with combination models are needed.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Breast self-examination (BSE) plays an important role in the early diagnosis of breast cancer in India owing to the stigma attached to cancer. The authors compared the efficacies of animation video versus simulation techniques in BSE.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Women with no previous history of conditions affecting the breasts were included in this prospective observational study and divided into an animation or simulation arm. The latter was further divided into three subgroups as per the simulation models used : the German (Delta Healthcare), British (Health Edco), and Indian (low-cost, validated) models used for teaching BSE. The hybrid animation video had a 9 min runtime with a lecture on BSE and a virtual character performing BSE. In both the arms, participants filled in a validated modified patient satisfaction questionnaire.
Results
UNASSIGNED
A total of 500 women participated. The mean age of the participants in the animation video arm was 20.21±3.88 years and 19.34±2.27, 22.94±9.6, and 18.97±1.31(20.41±5.99) years in the Indian, German, and British simulation models arm, respectively. The age difference between the two arms was statistically significant (
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
All models had good efficiency and utility as learning tools for BSE. However, large studies in BSE set up with combination models are needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37663692
doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000917
pii: AMSU-D-23-00464
pmc: PMC10473313
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
4228-4233Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interests. A part of this manuscript was accepted as a poster and presented by Sarrah Idrees at the 49th World Congress of Surgery at Vienna, Austria in August 2022.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
Références
South Asian J Cancer. 2016 Jul-Sep;5(3):95-103
pubmed: 27606290
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020 Jul;17(3):e12318
pubmed: 31957268
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(9):5077-83
pubmed: 24175779
South Asian J Cancer. 2014 Apr;3(2):97-100
pubmed: 24818103
Value Health Reg Issues. 2020 Dec;23:30-36
pubmed: 32498024
Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2015 Oct-Dec;36(4):207-9
pubmed: 26811588
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Feb 7;85(2):166-171
pubmed: 36845769
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jun 13;8(2):
pubmed: 32545805
Curr Psychol. 2022 Feb 21;:1-9
pubmed: 35221635
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Jan;31(1):e13543
pubmed: 34935220
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0262468
pubmed: 35025941
ScientificWorldJournal. 2020 Mar 30;2020:7484631
pubmed: 32292294
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Sep 23;8(9):e21584
pubmed: 32965225
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 Apr 13;41:43-46
pubmed: 31016018
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008 Oct-Dec;9(4):671-7
pubmed: 19256757
Int Q Community Health Educ. 2020 Jul;40(4):289-297
pubmed: 31652076
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Jul-Aug;22(4):520-524
pubmed: 30148101
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0262030
pubmed: 35061770
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD005634
pubmed: 18254086
Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106165
pubmed: 34774726
Collegian. 2007 Jan;14(1):11-5
pubmed: 17294681
Yonsei Med J. 2008 Dec 31;49(6):886-90
pubmed: 19108009
J Cancer Res Ther. 2022 Oct-Dec;18(6):1776-1781
pubmed: 36412443
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug;13(4):289-295
pubmed: 28181405