Efficacy of opioid-free anesthesia in modified radical mastectomy: a cross-sectional observational study.
morphine use
opioid-free general anesthesia
pectoralis and serratus plane block
postoperative pain
time to extubate
Journal
Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)
ISSN: 2049-0801
Titre abrégé: Ann Med Surg (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101616869
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
28
01
2023
accepted:
16
04
2023
medline:
4
9
2023
pubmed:
4
9
2023
entrez:
4
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Perioperative management of female patients undergoing breast surgeries differs from other patients due to chronic pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting. The anesthesia could consist of opioid-free general anesthesia (OFA) or non-opioid-free general anesthesia (NOFA). OFA relies on multimodal analgesia preoperatively and postoperatively. However, it is not yet established whether OFA could replace NOFA as a standard regimen for the management of breast surgeries. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of OFA for breast surgeries in female patients. Patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy were retrospectively recruited. Two groups were defined: group 1, consisting of treated patients using OFA and group 2, consisting of treated patients using NOFA. Mean time to extubate and mean dose of morphine after recovery were computed. Postoperative morphine and antiemetic use were assessed for up to 24 h. A comparison of the computed data was conducted between both groups. A total of 116 patients were included with a mean age of 53±13 years. Group 1 consisted of 56 (mean age was 54±14 years). Group 2 consisted of 60 patients (mean age was 51±12 years). Demographic parameters and time to extubate did not yield significant differences. We noticed morphine sparing at T0 and T12 with statistically significant differences OFA could be considered in modified radical mastectomy management in female patients; nerve block seemed to act as morphine sparing in operative and postoperative settings by providing significantly less time to extubate with less postoperative morphine requirement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37663699
doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000718
pii: AMSU-D-23-00195
pmc: PMC10473328
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
4289-4292Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
Références
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(18):e15423
pubmed: 31045802
Anesthesiology. 2018 Sep;129(3):590-607
pubmed: 29738328
BJA Educ. 2018 Nov;18(11):342-348
pubmed: 33456800
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117(3):382-6
pubmed: 27543533
Pain Res Manag. 2018 May 15;2018:4315931
pubmed: 29861803
Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106165
pubmed: 34774726
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Oct;142(4):608e-609e
pubmed: 30045165
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Mar;35(3):215-223
pubmed: 29227351
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Jun 22;15:937-944
pubmed: 32606635
Cureus. 2020 Nov 2;12(11):e11295
pubmed: 33282572