Integration of operator-validated contours in deformable image registration for dose accumulation in radiotherapy.

Adaptive radiotherapy Constrained motion estimation Contour guidance Deformable dose warping Deformable image registration Preconditioning

Journal

Physics and imaging in radiation oncology
ISSN: 2405-6316
Titre abrégé: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101704276

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Historique:
received: 17 04 2023
revised: 16 08 2023
accepted: 16 08 2023
medline: 4 9 2023
pubmed: 4 9 2023
entrez: 4 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Deformable image registration (DIR) is a core element of adaptive radiotherapy workflows, integrating daily contour propagation and/or dose accumulation in their design. Propagated contours are usually manually validated and may be edited, thereby locally invalidating the registration result. This means the registration cannot be used for dose accumulation. In this study we proposed and evaluated a novel multi-modal DIR algorithm that incorporated contour information to guide the registration. This integrates operator-validated contours with the estimated deformation vector field and warped dose. The proposed algorithm consisted of both a normalized gradient field-based data-fidelity term on the images and an optical flow data-fidelity term on the contours. The Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition was incorporated to ensure anatomically plausible deformations. The algorithm was validated for same- and cross-contrast Magnetic Resonance (MR) image registrations, Computed Tomography (CT) registrations, and CT-to-MR registrations for different anatomies, all based on challenging clinical situations. The contour-correspondence, anatomical fidelity, registration error, and dose warping error were evaluated. The proposed contour-guided algorithm considerably and significantly increased contour overlap, decreasing the mean distance to agreement by a factor of 1.3 to 13.7, compared to the best algorithm without contour-guidance. Importantly, the registration error and dose warping error decreased significantly, by a factor of 1.2 to 2.0. Our contour-guided algorithm ensured that the deformation vector field and warped quantitative information were consistent with the operator-validated contours. This provides a feasible semi-automatic strategy for spatially correct warping of quantitative information even in difficult and artefacted cases.

Sections du résumé

Background and Purpose UNASSIGNED
Deformable image registration (DIR) is a core element of adaptive radiotherapy workflows, integrating daily contour propagation and/or dose accumulation in their design. Propagated contours are usually manually validated and may be edited, thereby locally invalidating the registration result. This means the registration cannot be used for dose accumulation. In this study we proposed and evaluated a novel multi-modal DIR algorithm that incorporated contour information to guide the registration. This integrates operator-validated contours with the estimated deformation vector field and warped dose.
Materials and Methods UNASSIGNED
The proposed algorithm consisted of both a normalized gradient field-based data-fidelity term on the images and an optical flow data-fidelity term on the contours. The Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition was incorporated to ensure anatomically plausible deformations. The algorithm was validated for same- and cross-contrast Magnetic Resonance (MR) image registrations, Computed Tomography (CT) registrations, and CT-to-MR registrations for different anatomies, all based on challenging clinical situations. The contour-correspondence, anatomical fidelity, registration error, and dose warping error were evaluated.
Results UNASSIGNED
The proposed contour-guided algorithm considerably and significantly increased contour overlap, decreasing the mean distance to agreement by a factor of 1.3 to 13.7, compared to the best algorithm without contour-guidance. Importantly, the registration error and dose warping error decreased significantly, by a factor of 1.2 to 2.0.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Our contour-guided algorithm ensured that the deformation vector field and warped quantitative information were consistent with the operator-validated contours. This provides a feasible semi-automatic strategy for spatially correct warping of quantitative information even in difficult and artefacted cases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37664798
doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100483
pii: S2405-6316(23)00074-X
pmc: PMC10472292
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100483

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The collaboration project is co-funded by the PPP Allowance made available by Health-Holland, Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, to stimulate public-private partnerships.

Références

Phys Med Biol. 2009 Apr 7;54(7):1849-70
pubmed: 19265208
Phys Med Biol. 2021 Mar 02;66(6):065002
pubmed: 33498036
Front Neuroinform. 2014 Jan 16;7:50
pubmed: 24474917
Med Phys. 2015 Jan;42(1):40-53
pubmed: 25563246
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jul;24(3):207-9
pubmed: 24931095
Radiat Oncol. 2020 May 11;15(1):104
pubmed: 32393280
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2010 Apr;20(2):94-106
pubmed: 20219547
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Dec;141:200-207
pubmed: 31585817
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021 Mar;25(3):720-736
pubmed: 32750981
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Feb 17;21:62-65
pubmed: 35243033
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Oct 21;61(20):7377-7396
pubmed: 27694705
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Mar 21;58(6):1889-901
pubmed: 23442596
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jan 7;55(1):305-27
pubmed: 20009196
Phys Med Biol. 2009 Jun 21;54(12):N229-37
pubmed: 19451689
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2023 Mar;42(3):697-712
pubmed: 36264729
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Jan;29(1):196-205
pubmed: 19923044
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Oct;21(10):10-24
pubmed: 32915492
J Digit Imaging. 2013 Dec;26(6):1045-57
pubmed: 23884657
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jun 10;14:53-60
pubmed: 33458315
J Biomech Eng. 2012 Jan;134(1):011005
pubmed: 22482660
Med Phys. 2020 Mar;47(3):1238-1248
pubmed: 31876300
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul;29(3):198-208
pubmed: 31027637
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Feb 17;21:54-61
pubmed: 35243032
Br J Radiol. 2021 Jun 01;94(1122):20210001
pubmed: 33882253
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jul;24(3):196-9
pubmed: 24931092
Phys Med. 2019 Mar;59:13-21
pubmed: 30928061
Radiother Oncol. 2023 May;182:109527
pubmed: 36773825

Auteurs

Lando S Bosma (LS)

Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Mario Ries (M)

Imaging Division, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Baudouin Denis de Senneville (B)

Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Institut de Mathématiques de Bordeaux (IMB), UMR 5251 CNRS/University of Bordeaux, F-33400 Talence, France.

Bas W Raaymakers (BW)

Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Cornel Zachiu (C)

Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH