Clinical performance of non-carious cervical lesions restored with using self-etch mode of adhesives according to the FDI criteria.
Abrasion
FDI criteria
non-carious cervical lesion
self-etch adhesive
universal adhesive
Journal
Australian dental journal
ISSN: 1834-7819
Titre abrégé: Aust Dent J
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 0370612
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
accepted:
16
08
2023
medline:
1
12
2023
pubmed:
4
9
2023
entrez:
4
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 18-month retrospective study of self-etch adhesive (Prime&Bond One Select) and self-etch mode of universal adhesives (Single Bond Universal, Gluma Bond Universal) applied to non-carious cervical lesions according to the World Dental Federation criteria. Thirty patients without any systemic disease, good oral hygiene, having at least 20 teeth and six non-carious cervical lesions treated using a self-etch mode of adhesives operated between January and March 2017. Accordingly, 335 restorations were evaluated according to the World Dental Federation criteria at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months. Pillai's Trace test was used to determine the interaction of criteria with time and adhesive systems. IBM SPSS Statistics 21.0 program was used in the analysis. Value of P < 0.05 was accepted as a criterion for statistical significance. At the end of 18 months, participation was 100%. There was a statistically significant difference P < 0.05 between Prime&Bond One Select and Single Bond Universal, Prime&Bond One Select and Gluma Bond Universal in the 18-month period. In terms of marginal staining, fracture of material and retention, recurrence of caries, erosion and abfraction, tooth integrity criteria at the end of the 18 months, Prime&Bond One Select performed clinically very good, Single Bond Universal and Gluma Bond Universal performed clinically good according to World Dental Federation criteria. Marginal adaptation criteria, Prime&Bond One Select, Single Bond Universal and Gluma Bond Universal performed clinically good. Retention loss rate was found to be the lowest in Prime&Bond One Select and the highest in Gluma Bond Universal. Accordingly, 18-month evaluation of all adhesives used in the study showed clinically acceptable results in all of the World Dental Federation criteria.
Substances chimiques
single bond
0
Gluma
95918-03-9
Dental Cements
0
Composite Resins
0
Resin Cements
0
Prime & Bond
0
Dentin-Bonding Agents
0
Adhesives
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
255-264Informations de copyright
© 2023 Australian Dental Association.
Références
Yazıcı AR, Tuncer D, Ozgunaltay G, et al. Farklı adeziv sistemlerle çürüksüz servikal lezyonlara uygulanan restorasyonların bir yıllık klinik değerlendirilmesi. HÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg 2009;33:70-78.
Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, Broome JC. Biologic considerations. In: Summitt JB, editor. Summitt's fundamentals of operative dentistry: a contemporary approach. 4th edn.. Hanover Park, IL: Quintessence Publishing, 2013:24-96.
McLean DE, Meyers EJ, Guillory VL, et al. Enamel bond strength of new universal adhesive bonding agents. Oper Dent 2015;40:410-417. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-287-L.
Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, et al. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864-881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003.
Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-235.
Munoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, et al. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2013;41:404-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001.
Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, et al. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 2014;42:800-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012.
Munoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, et al. In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Oper Dent 2015;40:282-292. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-055-L.
Perdigao J, Loguercio AD. Universal or multi-mode adhesives: why and how? J Adhes Dent 2014;16:193-194.
Peumans M, De Munck J, Mine A, et al. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review. Dent Mater 2014;30:1089-1103.
Loguercio AD, de Paula EA, Hass V, et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 36-Month randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Dent 2015;43:1083-1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.005.
Chen C, Niu L-N, Xie H, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine-old wine in new bottles? J Dent 2015;43:525-536.
do Amaral RC, Stanislawczuk R, Zander-Grande C, et al. Active application improves the bonding performance of self-etch adhesives to dentin. J Dent 2009;37:82-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.09.010.
Silva e Souza MH Jr, Carneiro KG, Lobato MF, et al. Adhesive systems: important aspects related to their composition and clinical use. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18:207-214. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572010000300002.
Cardoso MV, de Almeida Neves A, Mine A, et al. Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry. Aust Dent J 2011;56(Suppl 1):31-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01294.x.
Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, et al. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012;91:376-381.
Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Nagaoka N, et al. Nano-controlled molecular interaction at adhesive interfaces for hard tissue reconstruction. Acta Biomater 2010;6:3573-3582.
Reis A, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Gomes OM, Patzlaff R, Loguercio AD. Impact of adhesive application to wet and dry dentin on long-term resin-dentin bond strengths. Oper Dent 2007;32:380-387.
Van Landuyt K, Snauwaert J, Peumans M, et al. The role of HEMA in one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2008;24:1412-1419.
Nakaoki Y, Nikaido T, Pereira P, et al. Dimensional changes of demineralized dentin treated with HEMA primers. Dent Mater 2000;16:441-446.
De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-132.
Torkabadi S, Nakajima M, Ikeda M, et al. Influence of bonded enamel margins on dentin bonding stability of one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:347-353.
Hashimoto M. A review-micromorphological evidence of degradation in resin-dentin bonds and potential preventional solutions. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2010;92:268-280.
Klein-Junior CA, Zander-Grande C, Amaral R, et al. Evaporating solvents with a warm air-stream: effects on adhesive layer properties and resin-dentin bond strengths. J Dent 2008;36:618-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.04.014.
Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomater 2007;28:3757-3785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044.
Irmak Ö, Baltacıoğlu İH, Ulusoy N, Bağış YH. Solvent type influences bond strength to air or blot-dried dentin. BMC Oral Health 2016;16:1-6.
Van Landuyt K, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, et al. Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching. J Den. 2006;34:77-85.
Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Int Dent J 2007;57:300-302.
Hickel R, Roulet J-F, Bayne S, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig 2007;11:5-33.
Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98-FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns. J Adhes Dent 2007;9(Suppl 1):121-147.
Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, et al. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:349-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8.
Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, et al. Thirteen-year randomized controlled clinical trial of a two-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 2015;31:308-314.
van Dijken JW. Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions. Am J Dent 2004;17:27-32.
Yoo HM, Pereira PN. Effect of blood contamination with 1-step self-etching adhesives on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent 2006;31:660-665. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-1279.
Peumans M, Munck J, Van Landuyt K, et al. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:512-518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00256.x.
Cardoso PC, Lopes G, Vieira L, et al. Effect of solvent type on microtensile bond strength of a total-etch one-bottle adhesive system to moist or dry dentin. Oper Dent-University of Washington 2005;30:376.
Lopes GC, Cardoso PC, Vieira LCC, Baratieri LN, Rampinelli K, Costa G. Shear bond strength of acetone-based one-bottle adhesive systems. Braz Dent J 2006;17:39-43.
Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, et al. Durability of resin-dentin bonds: effects of direct/indirect exposure and storage media. Dent Mater 2007;23:885-892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.030.
van Dijken JW. A randomized controlled 5-year prospective study of two HEMA-free adhesives, a 1-step self-etching and a 3-step etch-and-rinse, in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 2013;29:e271-e280.
Ozgunaltay G, Onen A. Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious class V lesions. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:1037-1041.
Powell LV, Johnson GH, Gordon GE. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations. Oper Dent 1995;20:7-13.
Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, et al. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: a two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122:41-47.
Hajizadeh H, Nemati-Karimooy A, Nasseh A, Rahmanpour N. Evaluating the shear bond strength of enamel and dentin with or without etching: a comparative study between dimethacrylate-based and silorane-based adhesives. J Clin Exp Dent 2015;7:e563.
Burrow M, Inokoshi S, Tagami J. Water sorption of several bonding resins. Am J Dent 1999;12:295-298.