Understanding the organisational influences on the quality of and access to primary care in English prisons: a qualitative interview study.
health care access
health care professionals
organisations
patient perspective
primary health care
prisons
qualitative research
quality of care
Journal
The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
ISSN: 1478-5242
Titre abrégé: Br J Gen Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005323
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2023
10 2023
Historique:
received:
20
01
2023
accepted:
05
06
2023
medline:
4
10
2023
pubmed:
5
9
2023
entrez:
4
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Primary care for routine healthcare conditions is delivered to thousands of people in the English prison estate every day but the prison environment presents unique challenges to the provision of high-quality health care. Little research has focused on the organisational factors that affect quality of and access to prison health care. To understand key influences on the quality of primary care in prisons. This was a qualitative interview study across the North of England from 2019 to 2021. Interviews were undertaken with 43 participants: 21 prison leavers and 22 prison healthcare professionals. Reflexive thematic analysis was undertaken. The overarching organisational issue influencing quality and access was that of chronic understaffing coupled with a workforce in flux and dependence on locum staff. This applied across different prisons, roles, and grades of staff, and was vocally discussed by both patient and staff participants. Intricately related to understaffing (and fuelled by it) was the propensity for a reactive and sometimes crisis-led service to develop that was characterised by continual firefighting. A persistent problem exacerbated by the above issues was unreliable communication about healthcare matters within some prisons, creating frustration. Positive commentary focused on the characteristics and actions of individual healthcare professionals. This study highlights understaffing and its consequences as the most significant threat to the quality of and access to prison primary care. Strategies to address health care affecting prison populations urgently need to consider staffing. This issue should receive high-profile and mainstream attention to address health inequalities.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Primary care for routine healthcare conditions is delivered to thousands of people in the English prison estate every day but the prison environment presents unique challenges to the provision of high-quality health care. Little research has focused on the organisational factors that affect quality of and access to prison health care.
AIM
To understand key influences on the quality of primary care in prisons.
DESIGN AND SETTING
This was a qualitative interview study across the North of England from 2019 to 2021.
METHOD
Interviews were undertaken with 43 participants: 21 prison leavers and 22 prison healthcare professionals. Reflexive thematic analysis was undertaken.
RESULTS
The overarching organisational issue influencing quality and access was that of chronic understaffing coupled with a workforce in flux and dependence on locum staff. This applied across different prisons, roles, and grades of staff, and was vocally discussed by both patient and staff participants. Intricately related to understaffing (and fuelled by it) was the propensity for a reactive and sometimes crisis-led service to develop that was characterised by continual firefighting. A persistent problem exacerbated by the above issues was unreliable communication about healthcare matters within some prisons, creating frustration. Positive commentary focused on the characteristics and actions of individual healthcare professionals.
CONCLUSION
This study highlights understaffing and its consequences as the most significant threat to the quality of and access to prison primary care. Strategies to address health care affecting prison populations urgently need to consider staffing. This issue should receive high-profile and mainstream attention to address health inequalities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37666512
pii: BJGP.2023.0040
doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0040
pmc: PMC10498379
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e720-e727Informations de copyright
© The Authors.
Références
Health Policy. 2020 Dec;124(12):1368-1378
pubmed: 32988648
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Jan;61(582):66-7
pubmed: 21402002
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Dec;100:103412
pubmed: 31629212
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Feb 02;19(1):22
pubmed: 29390968
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jun 21;24:100416
pubmed: 33015596
Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):281-315
pubmed: 11439467
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 7;21(1):314
pubmed: 33827565
Health Justice. 2022 Mar 7;10(1):13
pubmed: 35257254
Health Serv Manage Res. 2019 May;32(2):69-77
pubmed: 29999425
Epidemiol Rev. 2018 Jun 1;40(1):4-11
pubmed: 29860342
J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 Aug 18;42(3):625-632
pubmed: 31125072