Finding the Optimal Resistance Training Intensity for Your Bones: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Bone Mineral Density
Fracture
Intensity
Moderate
Osteoporosis
Progressive Resistance Training
Journal
Physical therapy
ISSN: 1538-6724
Titre abrégé: Phys Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0022623
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Oct 2023
03 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
04
01
2023
revised:
17
03
2023
accepted:
04
05
2023
pmc-release:
05
09
2024
pubmed:
5
9
2023
medline:
5
9
2023
entrez:
5
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the effect of twice-weekly, moderate-to-high intensity progressive resistance training (PRT) for 1 year on lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in individuals with low BMD, compared to attention control. Secondary analyses will examine if resistance training improves other health outcomes; if high intensity is more effective than moderate intensity resistance training for all outcomes; the cost of intervention versus benefit; the willingness to pay; and harms. For this study, 324 men or postmenopausal women aged ≥50 years with a femoral neck, total hip, or lumbar spine BMD T-score of ≤-1, or a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool probability of ≥20% for major osteoporotic fracture or ≥ 3% for hip fracture are being recruited to participate in a randomized controlled trial with 1:1:1 randomization. Participants will be stratified by site (3 centers) to twice-weekly, supervised PRT at moderate intensity (about 10 repetitions maximum), to high intensity PRT (≤6 repetitions maximum), or to a home posture and balance exercise program (attention control) for 1 year (resistance training to comparator allocation ratio of 2:1). The primary outcome is lumbar spine BMD via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Secondary outcomes include trabecular bone score, proximal femur and total hip BMD and structure, bone-free and appendicular lean mass, physical functioning, falls, fractures, glucose metabolism, cost per life-year gained, adverse events, and quality of life. Between-group differences will be tested in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses using analysis of covariance, chi-square tests, or negative binomial or logistic regression, adjusting for site and baseline values. The Finding the Optimal Resistance Training Intensity For Your Bones trial will support decision making on resistance training for people at risk of fracture.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37669136
pii: 7260580
doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad120
pmc: PMC10549785
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 166042
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Physical Therapy Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Health Rep. 2016 Oct 19;27(10):3-10
pubmed: 27759870
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021 Jun;46(6):589-596
pubmed: 33226847
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15;155(10):668-79, W205
pubmed: 22084333
J Rheumatol. 2001 Feb;28(2):413-21
pubmed: 11246689
Value Health. 2015 Sep;18(6):753-8
pubmed: 26409601
BMJ. 2017 Aug 2;358:j3453
pubmed: 28768629
CMAJ. 2010 Nov 23;182(17):1864-73
pubmed: 20940232
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Jun;28(6):1953-1963
pubmed: 28413842
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Mar;41(3):297-308
pubmed: 8440854
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 06;(7):CD000333
pubmed: 21735380
JAMA. 2001 Apr 18;285(15):1987-91
pubmed: 11308435
Osteoporos Int. 2018 May;29(5):1081-1091
pubmed: 29441402
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;17(2):304-10
pubmed: 21040242
PLoS Med. 2008 Oct 14;5(10):e196
pubmed: 18922041
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Oct;59(10):1149-57
pubmed: 16015256
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Aug;21(8):1042-52
pubmed: 23680877
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Aug;14(8):542-59
pubmed: 23867520
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Feb;33(2):211-220
pubmed: 28975661
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Sep;53(9):1618-22
pubmed: 16137297
Sports Med. 2015 Dec;45(12):1693-720
pubmed: 26420238
J Bone Miner Res. 2013 Apr;28(4):780-93
pubmed: 23165609
Calcif Tissue Int. 2019 Mar;104(3):235-238
pubmed: 30796490
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Nov;29(11):2545-2556
pubmed: 30091064
Osteoporos Int. 2020 May;31(5):867-874
pubmed: 31838552
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2011 Sep;11(3):249-56
pubmed: 21885900
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):7
pubmed: 29372344
Bone. 1995 Oct;17(4 Suppl):197S-205S
pubmed: 8579917
Physiother Can. 2019 Summer;71(3):231-238
pubmed: 31719719