Combining glucose and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 09 2023
05 09 2023
Historique:
received:
15
03
2023
accepted:
15
06
2023
medline:
7
9
2023
pubmed:
6
9
2023
entrez:
5
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Glucose is a universally available inexpensive biomarker, which is increased as part of the physiological stress response to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and may therefore help in its early diagnosis. To test this hypothesis, glucose, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) T, and hs-cTnI were measured in consecutive patients presenting with acute chest discomfort to the emergency department (ED) and enrolled in a large international diagnostic study (NCT00470587). Two independent cardiologists centrally adjudicated the final diagnosis using all clinical data, including serial hs-cTnT measurements, cardiac imaging and clinical follow-up. The primary diagnostic endpoint was index non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI). Prognostic endpoints were all-cause death, and cardiovascular (CV) death or future AMI, all within 730-days. Among 5639 eligible patients, NSTEMI was the adjudicated final diagnosis in 1051 (18.6%) patients. Diagnostic accuracy quantified using the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) for the combination of glucose with hs-cTnT and glucose with hs-cTnI was very high, but not higher versus that of hs-cTn alone (glucose/hs-cTnT 0.930 [95% CI 0.922-0.937] versus hs-cTnT 0.929 [95% CI 0.922-0.937]; glucose/hs-cTnI 0.944 [95% CI 0.937-0.951] versus hs-cTnI 0.944 [95% CI 0.937-0.951]). In early-presenters, a dual-marker strategy (glucose < 7 mmol/L and hs-cTnT < 5/hs-cTnI < 4 ng/L) provided very high and comparable sensitivity to slightly lower hs-cTn concentrations (cTnT/I < 4/3 ng/L) alone, and possibly even higher efficacy. Glucose was an independent predictor of 730-days endpoints. Our results showed that a dual marker strategy of glucose and hs-cTn did not increase the diagnostic accuracy when used continuously. However, a cutoff approach combining glucose and hs-cTn may provide diagnostic utility for patients presenting ≤ 3 h after onset of symptoms, also providing important prognostic information.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37670005
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37093-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-37093-1
pmc: PMC10480296
doi:
Substances chimiques
teloxantrone
96521WL61B
Glucose
IY9XDZ35W2
Troponin
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00470587']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14598Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Thygesen, K. et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J. 40, 237–269 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy462
pubmed: 30165617
Collet, J. P. et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur. Heart J. 42, 1289–1367 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575
pubmed: 32860058
James, S. L. et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 392, 1789–1858 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7
Ibanez, B. et al. 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur. Heart J. 39, 119–177 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
pubmed: 28886621
Lopez-Ayala, P., Boeddinghaus, J., Koechlin, L., Nestelberger, T. & Mueller, C. Early rule-out strategies in the emergency department utilizing high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. Clin. Chem. 67, 114–123 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa226
pubmed: 33279982
Shah, A. S. V. et al. High-sensitivity troponin in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 392, 919–928 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31923-8
pubmed: 30170853
pmcid: 6137538
Twerenbold, R. et al. Outcome of applying the ESC 0/1-hour algorithm in patients with suspected myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 74, 483–494 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.046
pubmed: 31345421
Altabas, V. et al. Glucose metabolism disorders in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Acta Clin. Croat. 51, 71–77 (2012).
pubmed: 22920005
Greenslade, J. H. et al. Combining presentation high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and glucose measurements to rule-out an acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting to emergency department with chest pain. Clin. Biochem. 48, 288–291 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.11.019
pubmed: 25485933
Shortt, C. et al. Rule-in and rule-out of myocardial infarction using cardiac troponin and glycemic biomarkers in patients with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome. Clin. Chem. 63, 403–414 (2017).
doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.261545
pubmed: 28062631
Shortt, C., Phan, K., Hill, S. A., Worster, A. & Kavsak, P. A. An approach to rule-out an acute cardiovascular event or death in emergency department patients using outcome-based cutoffs for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays and glucose. Clin. Biochem. 48, 282–287 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.11.010
pubmed: 25448027
Lippi, G., Cervellin, G. & Targher, G. Random plasma glucose measurement may improve the diagnostic specificity of highly sensitive troponin in the emergency department. Int. J. Cardiol. 155, 172–173 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.046
pubmed: 22178055
Boeddinghaus, J. et al. Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 75, 1111–1124 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.065
pubmed: 32164884
Nestelberger, T. et al. Direct comparison of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and I in the early differentiation of type 1 vs type 2 myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care 11, 62–74 (2022).
doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab039
pubmed: 34195803
Lopez-Ayala, P. et al. Novel criteria for the observe-zone of the ESC 0/1h-hs-cTnT algorithm. Circulation 144, 773–787 (2021).
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.052982
pubmed: 34376064
von Elm, E. et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 61, 344–349 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008
Wildi, K. et al. Misdiagnosis of myocardial infarction related to limitations of the current regulatory approach to define clinical decision values for cardiac troponin. Circulation 131, 2032–2040 (2015).
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014129
pubmed: 25948541
pmcid: 4456170
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. J. Clin. Appl. Res. Educ. 45, S1 (2021).
Restan, I. Z. et al. Adding stress biomarkers to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin for rapid non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction rule-out protocols. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care 11, 201 (2022).
doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab124
pubmed: 35024819
pmcid: 8929978
Cosentino, F. et al. 2019 ESC guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur. Heart J. 41, 255–323 (2020).
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz486
pubmed: 31497854
Charpentier, S. et al. Usefulness of initial glucose level to improve acute coronary syndrome diagnosis in the emergency department. Emerg. Med. J. 28, 564–568 (2011).
doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.094284
pubmed: 20659883
Dungan, K. M., Braithwaite, S. S. & Preiser, J. C. Stress hyperglycaemia. Lancet 373, 1798–1807 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60553-5
pubmed: 19465235
pmcid: 3144755
McCowen, K. C., Malhotra, A. & Bistrian, B. R. Stress-induced hyperglycemia. Crit. Care Clin. 17, 107–124 (2001).
doi: 10.1016/S0749-0704(05)70154-8
pubmed: 11219223
Wilson, E. B. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 22, 209 (1927).
doi: 10.1080/01621459.1927.10502953
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M. & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44, 837 (1988).
doi: 10.2307/2531595
pubmed: 3203132
Kosinski, A. S. A weighed generalized score statistic for comparison of predictive values of diagnostic tests. Stat. Med. 32, 964–977 (2013).
doi: 10.1002/sim.5587
pubmed: 22912343
Sauerbrei, W. et al. State of the art in selection of variables and functional forms in multivariable analysis—Outstanding issues. Diagn. Progn. Res. 4, 3 (2020).
doi: 10.1186/s41512-020-00074-3
pubmed: 32266321
pmcid: 7114804
Harrell, F. E. Regression Modeling Strategies (Springer, 2001).
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1
Anand, A. et al. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin on presentation to rule out myocardial infarction: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Circulation 143, 2214–2224 (2021).
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.052380
pubmed: 33752439
pmcid: 8177493
Zellweger, C. et al. Use of copeptin and high-sensitive cardiac troponin T for diagnosis and prognosis in patients with diabetes mellitus and suspected acute myocardial infarction. Int. J. Cardiol. 190, 190–197 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.134
pubmed: 25920022
Raskovalova, T. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of combined cardiac troponin and copeptin assessment for early rule-out of myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care 3, 18–27 (2014).
doi: 10.1177/2048872613514015
pubmed: 24562800
pmcid: 3932778
Chenevier-Gobeaux, C. et al. Is high-sensitivity troponin, alone or in combination with copeptin, sensitive enough for ruling out NSTEMI in very early presenters at admission? A post hoc analysis performed in emergency departments. BMJ Open 9, e023994 (2019).
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023994
pubmed: 31209082
pmcid: 6589015
Mueller, C. et al. Use of copeptin for rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care 7, 570–576 (2018).
doi: 10.1177/2048872617710791
pubmed: 28593800
Foo, K. et al. A single serum glucose measurement predicts adverse outcomes across the whole range of acute coronary syndromes. Heart 89, 512–516 (2003).
doi: 10.1136/heart.89.5.512
pubmed: 12695455
pmcid: 1767629
Kosiborod, M. et al. Admission glucose and mortality in elderly patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: Implications for patients with and without recognized diabetes. Circulation 111, 3078–3086 (2005).
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.517839
pubmed: 15939812
Gardner, L. S. et al. Admission glycaemia and its association with acute coronary syndrome in emergency department patients with chest pain. Emerg. Med. J. 32, 608–612 (2015).
doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204046
pubmed: 25344576
Alavi-Moghaddam, M., Parsa-Mahjoob, M., Ghodssi-Ghassemabadi, R. & Bitazar, B. Association of admission blood glucose level with major adverse cardiac events in acute coronary syndrome; a cohort study. Arch. Acad. Emerg. Med. 7, e26 (2019).
pubmed: 31432036
pmcid: 6637796