Potential of patellar height measurement methods in predicting recurrent patellar dislocation incidence: a case-control study.
Patellar alta
Patellar dislocation
Patellar height index
Patellar height measurement method
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Sep 2023
05 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
10
01
2023
accepted:
19
08
2023
medline:
7
9
2023
pubmed:
6
9
2023
entrez:
5
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) is a multifactorial disease that affects young and active people. Patellar height measurements are used clinically to screen and diagnose knee conditions. However, there are no known studies that have assessed and compared the performance of patellar height indices for predicting the incidence of RPD, which could be used to recommend surgical treatment after primary patellar dislocation. This case-control study aimed to determine if the patellar height index could be used to predict the incidence of RPD, and to identify the optimal method in terms of its diagnostic ability for RPD. Altogether, 133 patients (52 patients with RPD [Group R] and 81 sex- and age-matched controls [Group C]) were enrolled in this study. The Insall-Salvati (IS), Blackburne-Peel (BP), Caton-Deschamps (CD), and modified IS (mIS) methods were used to measure the patellar height index. The intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities of these four methods were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive ability of each index and identify the cut-off values that indicated significantly increased risk of RPD. Patient demographics were similar between the two groups. The inter-observer and intra-observer reliabilities were good for all four methods. In patients with RPD, the mean index values for the four methods were significantly higher than those in the matched controls. The area under the curve (AUC) values for IS, BP, CD, and mIS were 0.91 (standard error [SE], 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.96), 0.72 (SE, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.63-0.81), 0.86 (SE, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.79-0.92), and 0.96 (SE, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99), respectively. Patellar height indices had high predictive performance for the incidence of RPD. The mIS method had the highest AUC.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) is a multifactorial disease that affects young and active people. Patellar height measurements are used clinically to screen and diagnose knee conditions. However, there are no known studies that have assessed and compared the performance of patellar height indices for predicting the incidence of RPD, which could be used to recommend surgical treatment after primary patellar dislocation. This case-control study aimed to determine if the patellar height index could be used to predict the incidence of RPD, and to identify the optimal method in terms of its diagnostic ability for RPD.
METHOD
METHODS
Altogether, 133 patients (52 patients with RPD [Group R] and 81 sex- and age-matched controls [Group C]) were enrolled in this study. The Insall-Salvati (IS), Blackburne-Peel (BP), Caton-Deschamps (CD), and modified IS (mIS) methods were used to measure the patellar height index. The intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities of these four methods were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive ability of each index and identify the cut-off values that indicated significantly increased risk of RPD.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Patient demographics were similar between the two groups. The inter-observer and intra-observer reliabilities were good for all four methods. In patients with RPD, the mean index values for the four methods were significantly higher than those in the matched controls. The area under the curve (AUC) values for IS, BP, CD, and mIS were 0.91 (standard error [SE], 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.96), 0.72 (SE, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.63-0.81), 0.86 (SE, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.79-0.92), and 0.96 (SE, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99), respectively.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Patellar height indices had high predictive performance for the incidence of RPD. The mIS method had the highest AUC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37670298
doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06813-z
pii: 10.1186/s12891-023-06813-z
pmc: PMC10478238
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
707Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Apr;26(4):1037-1043
pubmed: 28299386
J Pediatr Orthop. 2014 Jan;34(1):78-85
pubmed: 23872803
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Mar;24(3):760-7
pubmed: 26704809
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Aug;89(8):1749-55
pubmed: 17671014
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1977 May;59(2):241-2
pubmed: 873986
Radiographics. 2010 Jul-Aug;30(4):961-81
pubmed: 20631363
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Dec;17(12):1412-5
pubmed: 19421740
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 26;(2):CD008106
pubmed: 25716704
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Apr;19(4):663-70
pubmed: 21153544
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Dec;90(12):2751-62
pubmed: 19047722
Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun;31(6):1207-15
pubmed: 25636989
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986 Mar;68(2):297-300
pubmed: 3958019
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Aug;20(8):1456-62
pubmed: 22105975
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63B(4):579-82
pubmed: 7298689
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017 Mar/Apr;46(2):E86-E96
pubmed: 28437505
Int Orthop. 2016 Nov;40(11):2277-2287
pubmed: 26202017
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Oct;93(10):1341-7
pubmed: 21969432
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Mar 24;15(1):118
pubmed: 32209111
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Jan 25;6(1):2325967117751659
pubmed: 29399590
Knee. 2002 Feb;9(1):3-6
pubmed: 11830373
Radiology. 1971 Oct;101(1):101-4
pubmed: 5111961
J Biomech. 1994 Aug;27(8):1059-65
pubmed: 8089160
Int Orthop. 2011 Dec;35(12):1791-7
pubmed: 21416109
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(4):231-6
pubmed: 10975264
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 May;468(5):1344-51
pubmed: 19629604
Radiology. 1992 Dec;185(3):859-63
pubmed: 1438776
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Feb;455:93-101
pubmed: 17279039
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Sep;26(9):2558-2567
pubmed: 28914334
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Jan;(274):265-9
pubmed: 1729011
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Nov;474(11):2337-2343
pubmed: 27506969
Arthroscopy. 2019 Feb;35(2):537-543
pubmed: 30612768
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Oct;13(7):539-44
pubmed: 15645214
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Dec;99(8 Suppl):S391-8
pubmed: 24246663
J Pediatr Orthop. 2017 Oct/Nov;37(7):484-490
pubmed: 26491910
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):346-51
pubmed: 22109545
Int Orthop. 2016 Mar;40(3):493-7
pubmed: 26178255
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 May;20(5):822-8
pubmed: 21732056
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Mar;136(3):371-9
pubmed: 26718351
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Nov;19(11):1909-14
pubmed: 21533537
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Oct;22(10):2308-14
pubmed: 24005331
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994;2(1):19-26
pubmed: 7584171
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Sep;(282):170-6
pubmed: 1516309
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Feb;21(2):275-8
pubmed: 23242381
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Dec;25(12):3869-3877
pubmed: 27796419