Applications of Natural Language Processing for the Management of Stroke Disorders: Scoping Review.
NLP
artificial intelligence
cardiovascular
deep learning
machine learning
natural language processing
review methodology
review methods
scoping
scoping review
stroke
Journal
JMIR medical informatics
ISSN: 2291-9694
Titre abrégé: JMIR Med Inform
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101645109
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Sep 2023
06 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
03
05
2023
accepted:
28
07
2023
revised:
26
07
2023
medline:
6
9
2023
pubmed:
6
9
2023
entrez:
6
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recent advances in natural language processing (NLP) have heightened the interest of the medical community in its application to health care in general, in particular to stroke, a medical emergency of great impact. In this rapidly evolving context, it is necessary to learn and understand the experience already accumulated by the medical and scientific community. The aim of this scoping review was to explore the studies conducted in the last 10 years using NLP to assist the management of stroke emergencies so as to gain insight on the state of the art, its main contexts of application, and the software tools that are used. Data were extracted from Scopus and Medline through PubMed, using the keywords "natural language processing" and "stroke." Primary research questions were related to the phases, contexts, and types of textual data used in the studies. Secondary research questions were related to the numerical and statistical methods and the software used to process the data. The extracted data were structured in tables and their relative frequencies were calculated. The relationships between categories were analyzed through multiple correspondence analysis. Twenty-nine papers were included in the review, with the majority being cohort studies of ischemic stroke published in the last 2 years. The majority of papers focused on the use of NLP to assist in the diagnostic phase, followed by the outcome prognosis, using text data from diagnostic reports and in many cases annotations on medical images. The most frequent approach was based on general machine learning techniques applied to the results of relatively simple NLP methods with the support of ontologies and standard vocabularies. Although smaller in number, there has been an increasing body of studies using deep learning techniques on numerical and vectorized representations of the texts obtained with more sophisticated NLP tools. Studies focused on NLP applied to stroke show specific trends that can be compared to the more general application of artificial intelligence to stroke. The purpose of using NLP is often to improve processes in a clinical context rather than to assist in the rehabilitation process. The state of the art in NLP is represented by deep learning architectures, among which Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers has been found to be especially widely used in the medical field in general, and for stroke in particular, with an increasing focus on the processing of annotations on medical images.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Recent advances in natural language processing (NLP) have heightened the interest of the medical community in its application to health care in general, in particular to stroke, a medical emergency of great impact. In this rapidly evolving context, it is necessary to learn and understand the experience already accumulated by the medical and scientific community.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this scoping review was to explore the studies conducted in the last 10 years using NLP to assist the management of stroke emergencies so as to gain insight on the state of the art, its main contexts of application, and the software tools that are used.
METHODS
METHODS
Data were extracted from Scopus and Medline through PubMed, using the keywords "natural language processing" and "stroke." Primary research questions were related to the phases, contexts, and types of textual data used in the studies. Secondary research questions were related to the numerical and statistical methods and the software used to process the data. The extracted data were structured in tables and their relative frequencies were calculated. The relationships between categories were analyzed through multiple correspondence analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Twenty-nine papers were included in the review, with the majority being cohort studies of ischemic stroke published in the last 2 years. The majority of papers focused on the use of NLP to assist in the diagnostic phase, followed by the outcome prognosis, using text data from diagnostic reports and in many cases annotations on medical images. The most frequent approach was based on general machine learning techniques applied to the results of relatively simple NLP methods with the support of ontologies and standard vocabularies. Although smaller in number, there has been an increasing body of studies using deep learning techniques on numerical and vectorized representations of the texts obtained with more sophisticated NLP tools.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Studies focused on NLP applied to stroke show specific trends that can be compared to the more general application of artificial intelligence to stroke. The purpose of using NLP is often to improve processes in a clinical context rather than to assist in the rehabilitation process. The state of the art in NLP is represented by deep learning architectures, among which Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers has been found to be especially widely used in the medical field in general, and for stroke in particular, with an increasing focus on the processing of annotations on medical images.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37672328
pii: v11i1e48693
doi: 10.2196/48693
pmc: PMC10512117
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
e48693Informations de copyright
©Helios De Rosario, Salvador Pitarch-Corresa, Ignacio Pedrosa, Marina Vidal-Pedrós, Beatriz de Otto-López, Helena García-Mieres, Lydia Álvarez-Rodríguez. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (https://medinform.jmir.org), 06.09.2023.
Références
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jun 15;21(1):191
pubmed: 34130677
Proc AMIA Symp. 2001;:662-6
pubmed: 11825268
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(Suppl 2):291-302
pubmed: 35534660
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 19;14(2):e0212356
pubmed: 30779785
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 May 1;25(5):530-537
pubmed: 29361077
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Jul;28(7):2045-2051
pubmed: 31103549
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Oct;29(10):105162
pubmed: 32912543
Acad Radiol. 2020 Feb;27(2):e19-e23
pubmed: 31053480
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 Oct;24(10):2922-2931
pubmed: 32142458
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Oct;42(5):839-51
pubmed: 19435614
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Nov;211:106446
pubmed: 34627022
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Nov 1;9(11):e29120
pubmed: 34723829
Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(1):181-189
pubmed: 33297865
Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996;:239-43
pubmed: 8947664
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 9;23(11):e28946
pubmed: 34751659
Stat Med. 2008 Jan 30;27(2):157-72; discussion 207-12
pubmed: 17569110
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 Nov 18;287:89-93
pubmed: 34795088
Sci Data. 2019 May 10;6(1):52
pubmed: 31076572
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017 Jun 21;2(4):230-243
pubmed: 29507784
Neurology. 2021 Sep 28;97(13):e1313-e1321
pubmed: 34376505
Front Neurol. 2021 Jul 13;12:649521
pubmed: 34326805
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Sep;153:167-173
pubmed: 35816976
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D267-70
pubmed: 14681409
Intern Med J. 2022 Feb;52(2):315-317
pubmed: 35187820
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Sep 9;19(1):184
pubmed: 31500613
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Mar;42(3):429-434
pubmed: 33334851
Eur J Neurol. 2021 Dec;28(12):4090-4097
pubmed: 34407269
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Aug 31;10(8):e39892
pubmed: 36044254
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Jun;4(6):e426-e435
pubmed: 35623797
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Apr 27;7(2):e12239
pubmed: 31066697
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Apr 08;14:798132
pubmed: 35462698
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 8;23(3):e22951
pubmed: 33683212
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Apr;19(4):348-360
pubmed: 32004440
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 28;14(2):e0212778
pubmed: 30818342
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Apr;112:149-157
pubmed: 29500013
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 19;15(6):e0234908
pubmed: 32559211
BMC Neurol. 2021 May 11;21(1):189
pubmed: 33975556
Stroke. 2021 Aug;52(8):2676-2679
pubmed: 34162217
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 May 4;9(5):e24381
pubmed: 33944791
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 21;10(24):e023486
pubmed: 34796719
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Feb 17;10(2):e29806
pubmed: 35175201
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jan 8;20(1):8
pubmed: 31914991
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020 Aug 25;13:1756286420938962
pubmed: 32922515
J Pers Med. 2020 Dec 16;10(4):
pubmed: 33339385
J Biomed Semantics. 2016 May 10;7:26
pubmed: 27175226
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2022 Jul;29(5):331-346
pubmed: 34115576
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jun;11(6):e004871
pubmed: 29903937