A cross-sectional investigation of Leptospira at the wildlife-livestock interface in New Zealand.
Journal
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
ISSN: 1935-2735
Titre abrégé: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2023
09 2023
Historique:
received:
27
02
2023
accepted:
22
08
2023
revised:
18
09
2023
medline:
19
9
2023
pubmed:
6
9
2023
entrez:
6
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There has been a recent upsurge in human cases of leptospirosis in New Zealand, with wildlife a suspected emerging source, but up-to-date knowledge on this topic is lacking. We conducted a cross-sectional study in two farm environments to estimate Leptospira seroprevalence in wildlife and sympatric livestock, PCR/culture prevalence in wildlife, and compare seroprevalence and prevalence between species, sex, and age groups. Traps targeting house mice (Mus musculus), black rats (Rattus rattus), hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) and brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) were set for 10 trap-nights in March-April 2017 on a dairy (A) and a beef and sheep (B) farm. Trapped wild animals and an age-stratified random sample of domestic animals, namely cattle, sheep and working dogs were blood sampled. Sera were tested by microagglutination test for five serogroups and titres compared using a Proportional Similarity Index (PSI). Wildlife kidneys were sampled for culture and qPCR targeting the lipL32 gene. True prevalence in mice was assessed using occupancy modelling by collating different laboratory results. Infection profiles varied by species, age group and farm. At the MAT cut-point of ≥ 48, up to 78% of wildlife species, and 16-99% of domestic animals were seropositive. Five of nine hedgehogs, 23/105 mice and 1/14 black rats reacted to L. borgpetersenii sv Ballum. The sera of 4/18 possums and 4/9 hedgehogs reacted to L. borgpetersenii sv Hardjobovis whilst 1/18 possums and 1/9 hedgehogs reacted to Tarassovi. In ruminants, seroprevalence for Hardjobovis and Pomona ranged 0-90% and 0-71% depending on the species and age group. Titres against Ballum, Tarassovi and Copenhageni were also observed in 4-20%, 0-25% and 0-21% of domestic species, respectively. The PSI indicated rodents and livestock had the most dissimilar serological responses. Three of nine hedgehogs, 31/105 mice and 2/14 rats were carrying leptospires (PCR and/or culture positive). True prevalence estimated by occupancy modelling in mice was 38% [95% Credible Interval 26, 51%] on Farm A and 22% [11, 40%] on Farm B. In the same environment, exposure to serovars found in wildlife species was commonly detected in livestock. Transmission pathways between and within species should be assessed to help in the development of efficient mitigation strategies against Leptospira.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37672535
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011624
pii: PNTD-D-23-00267
pmc: PMC10506710
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0011624Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Moinet et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
N Z Vet J. 1981 Jul;29(7):121-5
pubmed: 6948232
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017 May;15(5):297-307
pubmed: 28260786
J R Soc Interface. 2021 Feb;18(175):20200964
pubmed: 33593210
Can Vet J. 1986 Nov;27(11):435-9
pubmed: 17422716
J Hyg (Lond). 1981 Dec;87(3):427-36
pubmed: 7310125
N Z Vet J. 1976 Nov;24(11):253-62
pubmed: 1071463
Vaccine. 2017 Mar 1;35(9):1362-1368
pubmed: 27109564
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 May 23;13(5):e0007270
pubmed: 31120895
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 20;6(4):
pubmed: 34698305
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jun 13;10(6):e0004733
pubmed: 27294677
N Z Vet J. 2002;50(3 Suppl):61-3
pubmed: 16032240
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020 Mar;70(3):1450-1456
pubmed: 31184568
Prev Vet Med. 2019 Oct 1;170:104727
pubmed: 31421493
N Z Med J. 1984 Feb 8;97(749):83-6
pubmed: 6583569
N Z Vet J. 1982 Jun;30(6):73-6
pubmed: 16030872
Int J Occup Environ Med. 2018 Apr;9(2):88-96
pubmed: 29667646
N Z Vet J. 1977 Apr;25(4):89-90, 95-6
pubmed: 275701
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001 Apr;14(2):296-326
pubmed: 11292640
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;943:257-66
pubmed: 23104295
N Z Vet J. 2016 May;64(3):145-53
pubmed: 26553450
N Z Med J. 2017 Sep 22;130(1462):102-108
pubmed: 28934773
Ecohealth. 2013 Sep;10(3):298-313
pubmed: 23918033
N Z Vet J. 2013 Mar;61(2):98-106
pubmed: 23013160
Zoonoses Public Health. 2018 Feb;65(1):e79-e85
pubmed: 29058382
J Wildl Dis. 1981 Oct;17(4):489-96
pubmed: 7338970
N Z Vet J. 1981 Jul;29(7):109-12
pubmed: 7033850
N Z Vet J. 2015 Nov;63(6):301-12
pubmed: 25966298
Front Microbiol. 2018 May 01;9:816
pubmed: 29765361
Rev Sci Tech. 1988 Jan;7(4):885-899
pubmed: 32370371
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Jun;49(6):1507-10
pubmed: 4015088
N Z Vet J. 1974 Mar;22(3):25-30
pubmed: 4525263
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021 Dec;71(12):
pubmed: 34914572
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Jul;82(3):199-200
pubmed: 25912810
N Z Vet J. 1973 Oct;21(10):218-20
pubmed: 4520929
Parasitology. 2019 Dec;146(14):1707-1713
pubmed: 31554531
N Z Vet J. 1982 Apr;30(4):38-42
pubmed: 16030859
Zoonoses Public Health. 2019 Aug;66(5):470-479
pubmed: 30942554
J Wildl Dis. 2016 Jul;52(3):468-77
pubmed: 27187029