Unraveling the physicochemical attributes of three cricket (
Caregivers
Children
Cricket meal
Food supplementation
Household food security
Nutritional quality
Sensory evaluation
Journal
Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft + [i.e. und] Technologie. Food science + technology. Science + technologie alimentaire
ISSN: 0023-6438
Titre abrégé: Lebensm Wiss Technol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9876251
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2023
01 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
22
04
2023
revised:
31
07
2023
accepted:
06
08
2023
medline:
7
9
2023
pubmed:
7
9
2023
entrez:
7
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Disgust and neophobia elicited by whole insect products, has necessitated the need to mask insect-based food products. The physico-chemical parameters, sensory acceptance, and willingness to pay (WTP) for wheat biscuits supplemented with cricket powder was evaluated. The biscuits' color intensity correlated with the cricket inclusion levels. Spread ration of cricket-enriched-biscuits increased (1.0-1.2-folds), while the hardness and fracturability decreased (1.0-1.3-folds and 1.0-1.2 folds, respectively) compared to the control biscuit. Cricket-biscuits exhibited 1.2-1.7, 1.1-3.7, 1.2-3.0 and 1.1-1.2-folds higher (p < 0.05) protein, ash, fiber, and fat, respectively. Ca, Fe, and Zn were 1.1-3.7, 1.1-1.2 and 1.4-4.0-folds higher, respectively, for cricket-based biscuits. Monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids proportionally increased with increasing cricket flour. On a likert scale, 71.4%, 71.9%, 38.4% and 57.5% of the caregivers and 38.6%, 58.3%, 40.0% and 34.0% for children (3-5 years) strongly preferred the color, texture, taste and aroma, respectively, of the cricket-based biscuits. Forty-seven (47%) of the caretakers were WTP a premium of 37 Kenyan shillings (0.34 USD) for cricket-based biscuits. Our findings demonstrated that integration of cricket flour into existing market-driven consumer familiar food products significantly increased acceptability and WTP, thus promising potential to contribute to improved food and nutritional security.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37675440
doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115171
pii: S0023-6438(23)00750-8
pmc: PMC10477817
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
115171Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
J Biomed Sci. 2017 Jul 27;24(1):50
pubmed: 28750629
Antioxidants (Basel). 2021 Jul 14;10(7):
pubmed: 34356355
Food Res Int. 2020 Nov;137:109619
pubmed: 33233207
Front Nutr. 2021 Jan 12;7:537915
pubmed: 33511150
Foods. 2020 Oct 28;9(11):
pubmed: 33126518
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018 Apr;54(2):213-223
pubmed: 28251581
Foods. 2021 Sep 29;10(10):
pubmed: 34681361
Food Res Int. 2019 Nov;125:108573
pubmed: 31554134
Nutrients. 2020 Sep 11;12(9):
pubmed: 32933038
Molecules. 2021 Feb 23;26(4):
pubmed: 33672127
Food Sci Nutr. 2018 Aug 17;6(7):1839-1847
pubmed: 30349673
Foods. 2021 Apr 03;10(4):
pubmed: 33916741
Food Sci Nutr. 2023 Feb 04;11(6):2787-2797
pubmed: 37324877
Foods. 2020 Jun 18;9(6):
pubmed: 32570724
Food Res Int. 2018 Apr;106:532-541
pubmed: 29579957
Nutrients. 2019 Apr 16;11(4):
pubmed: 30995745
Insects. 2020 Sep 25;11(10):
pubmed: 32992806
Front Nutr. 2021 Dec 03;8:792941
pubmed: 34926558
Front Nutr. 2021 Aug 10;8:704002
pubmed: 34447775
Food Chem. 2022 Jul 30;383:132397
pubmed: 35183962
Insects. 2022 Jan 25;13(2):
pubmed: 35206703
Nutrients. 2019 Jul 15;11(7):
pubmed: 31311164
Food Nutr Bull. 2017 Sep;38(3):405-427
pubmed: 28682645
Molecules. 2021 Sep 06;26(17):
pubmed: 34500847
J Food Sci Technol. 2019 Mar;56(3):1145-1154
pubmed: 30956294
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2020 Nov;19(6):3241-3265
pubmed: 33337058
Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment. 2018 Jul-Sep;17(3):227-233
pubmed: 30269462