Physiotherapy as part of collaborative and person-centered rehabilitation services: the social systems constraining an innovative practice.

Physiotherapy collaborative person-centered rehabilitation service innovation

Journal

Physiotherapy theory and practice
ISSN: 1532-5040
Titre abrégé: Physiother Theory Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9015520

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Sep 2023
Historique:
medline: 7 9 2023
pubmed: 7 9 2023
entrez: 7 9 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

A person-centered and collaborative practice is considered crucial in contemporary physiotherapy. These ideals are often embraced in theory but are difficult to put into practice. As problems and solutions are related, understanding and refining theory on practical problems can close the knowing-doing gap and link the problem to the development of possible solutions. To explore the challenges with providing physiotherapy as part of collaborative and person-centered rehabilitation services. This article reports on an all-day interactive workshop with eight focus group discussions where physiotherapists from six different professional settings participated. We draw on theories of institutional logics to interpret the results. Challenges were linked to: 1) Professional level: Services being based on what the profession can offer - not on users' needs; 2) Organizational level: Rewarding efficiency instead of user outcomes; and 3) System level: Not knowing the other service providers involved or what they are doing. An innovative practice was constrained by multilevel social systems: the professional logic shaping the perceived professional scope, the organizational logic shaping the understanding of what was expected in the organizational context, and a system logic within a biomedical paradigm. Transforming and transcending these social systems is needed to realize collaborative and person-centered practice.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
A person-centered and collaborative practice is considered crucial in contemporary physiotherapy. These ideals are often embraced in theory but are difficult to put into practice. As problems and solutions are related, understanding and refining theory on practical problems can close the knowing-doing gap and link the problem to the development of possible solutions.
OBJECTIVE UNASSIGNED
To explore the challenges with providing physiotherapy as part of collaborative and person-centered rehabilitation services.
METHODS UNASSIGNED
This article reports on an all-day interactive workshop with eight focus group discussions where physiotherapists from six different professional settings participated. We draw on theories of institutional logics to interpret the results.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
Challenges were linked to: 1) Professional level: Services being based on what the profession can offer - not on users' needs; 2) Organizational level: Rewarding efficiency instead of user outcomes; and 3) System level: Not knowing the other service providers involved or what they are doing.
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
An innovative practice was constrained by multilevel social systems: the professional logic shaping the perceived professional scope, the organizational logic shaping the understanding of what was expected in the organizational context, and a system logic within a biomedical paradigm. Transforming and transcending these social systems is needed to realize collaborative and person-centered practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37676077
doi: 10.1080/09593985.2023.2255893
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-16

Auteurs

Lina Forslund (L)

Department of Health and Care Sciences, University of Tromsø, Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Cathrine Arntzen (C)

Department of Health and Care Sciences, University of Tromsø, Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Center for Care Sciences, North, University of Tromsø, Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Morten Nikolaisen (M)

Department of Health and Care Sciences, University of Tromsø, Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Center for Care Sciences, North, University of Tromsø, Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Astrid Gramstad (A)

Department of Health and Care Sciences, University of Tromsø, Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Marianne Eliassen (M)

Department of Health and Care Sciences, University of Tromsø, Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Classifications MeSH