Prognostic impact of post-treatment FDG PET/CT in anal canal cancer: A prospective study.

18F-FDG PET/CT Anal canal neoplasm Clinical evaluation Metabolic response Prognostic factor

Journal

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
ISSN: 1879-0887
Titre abrégé: Radiother Oncol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8407192

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 24 03 2023
revised: 12 08 2023
accepted: 01 09 2023
pubmed: 8 9 2023
medline: 8 9 2023
entrez: 7 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of our prospective study was to assess the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT performed two months post treatment for anal canal neoplasm. Consecutive patients with histologically proved anal cancer, with 18F-FDG PET/CT pre and two months post treatment were included. Patients were not previously treated for this neoplasm and then received radiotherapy ± chemotherapy. Clinical and pathologic data were collected and for 18F-FDG PET/CT visual and quantitative analysis (standardized uptake value, metabolic volume) were performed; response was classified according to EORTC and PERCIST criteria. The results were assessed for disease free survival and local recurrence free survival using the log-Rank test RESULTS: From December 2014 to September 2019, 94 consecutive patients were screened and 78 were included in this study. Median follow-up was 51 months. Two months post treatment, 37 patients (47.4%) had a complete radiological response according to both EORTC and PERCIST criteria, 66 patients (84.6%) had a clinical complete response. For disease free survival, the prognostic value of complete response was statistically significant (p=0.02) with 18F-FDG PET/CT and with clinical examination (p<0.001). For local recurrence free survival, the prognostic value with 18F-FDG PET/CT was lower (p=0.04) than clinical examination (p < 0.007). While clinical examination remains the gold standard for post treatment evaluation in anal cancer, 18F-FDG PET/CT has a statistically significant prognostic value. These two assessments could be combined to improve early evaluation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
The aim of our prospective study was to assess the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT performed two months post treatment for anal canal neoplasm.
POPULATION AND METHODS METHODS
Consecutive patients with histologically proved anal cancer, with 18F-FDG PET/CT pre and two months post treatment were included. Patients were not previously treated for this neoplasm and then received radiotherapy ± chemotherapy. Clinical and pathologic data were collected and for 18F-FDG PET/CT visual and quantitative analysis (standardized uptake value, metabolic volume) were performed; response was classified according to EORTC and PERCIST criteria. The results were assessed for disease free survival and local recurrence free survival using the log-Rank test RESULTS: From December 2014 to September 2019, 94 consecutive patients were screened and 78 were included in this study. Median follow-up was 51 months. Two months post treatment, 37 patients (47.4%) had a complete radiological response according to both EORTC and PERCIST criteria, 66 patients (84.6%) had a clinical complete response. For disease free survival, the prognostic value of complete response was statistically significant (p=0.02) with 18F-FDG PET/CT and with clinical examination (p<0.001). For local recurrence free survival, the prognostic value with 18F-FDG PET/CT was lower (p=0.04) than clinical examination (p < 0.007).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
While clinical examination remains the gold standard for post treatment evaluation in anal cancer, 18F-FDG PET/CT has a statistically significant prognostic value. These two assessments could be combined to improve early evaluation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37678620
pii: S0167-8140(23)89799-7
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109905
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

109905

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Caroline Bailleux (C)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France.

Colette Zwarthoed (C)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Nuclear Medicine, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France.

Ludovic Evesque (L)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France.

David Baron (D)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Radiation Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France.

Cyrielle Scouarnec (C)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Radiation Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France.

Karen Benezery (K)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Radiation Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France.

David Chardin (D)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Nuclear Medicine, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France.

Claire Jaraudias (C)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France.

Yann Chateau (Y)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Statistic, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France.

Jocelyn Gal (J)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Statistic, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France.

Eric François (E)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France. Electronic address: eric.francois@nice.unicancer.fr.

Classifications MeSH