Accounting for the climate benefit of temporary carbon storage in nature.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Sep 2023
07 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
12
01
2023
accepted:
25
08
2023
medline:
8
9
2023
pubmed:
8
9
2023
entrez:
7
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nature-based climate solutions can contribute to climate mitigation, but the vulnerability of land carbon to disturbances means that efforts to slow or reverse land carbon loss could result in only temporary storage. The challenge of accounting for temporary storage is a key barrier to the implementation of nature-based climate mitigation strategies. Here we offer a solution to this challenge using tonne-year accounting, which integrates the amount of carbon over the time that it remains in storage. We show that tonne-years of carbon storage are proportional to degree-years of avoided warming, and that a physically based tonne-year accounting metric could effectively quantify and track the climate benefit of temporary carbon storage. If the world can sustain an increasing number of tonne-years alongside rapid fossil fuel CO
Identifiants
pubmed: 37679349
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41242-5
pii: 10.1038/s41467-023-41242-5
pmc: PMC10485027
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5485Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Griscom, B. W. et al. Natural climate solutions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11645–11650 (2017).
pmcid: 5676916
pubmed: 29078344
Drever, C. R. et al. Natural climate solutions for Canada. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd6034 (2021).
pmcid: 8177698
pubmed: 34088658
Cook-Patton, S. C. et al. Protect, manage and then restore lands for climate mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 1027–1034 (2021).
Seddon, N. Harnessing the potential of nature-based solutions for mitigating and adapting to climate change. Science 376, 1410–1416 (2022).
pubmed: 35737796
Reed, G. et al. Toward Indigenous visions of nature-based solutions: an exploration into Canadian federal climate policy. Clim. Policy 22, 514–533 (2022).
Townsend, J., Moola, F. & Craig, M.-K. Indigenous peoples are critical to the success of nature-based solutions to climate change. Facets 5, 551–556 (2020).
Bathiany, S., Claussen, M., Brovkin, V., Raddatz, T. & Gayler, V. Combined biogeophysical and biogeochemical effects of large-scale forest cover changes in the MPI earth system model. Biogeosciences 7, 1383–1399 (2010).
Betts, R. A. Offset of the potential carbon sink from boreal forestation by decreases in surface albedo. Nature 408, 187–190 (2000).
pubmed: 11089969
Keith, H. et al. Evaluating nature-based solutions for climate mitigation and conservation requires comprehensive carbon accounting. Sci. Total Environ. 769, 144341 (2021).
pubmed: 33736241
Ajani, J. I., Keith, H., Blakers, M., Mackey, B. G. & King, H. P. Comprehensive carbon stock and flow accounting: a national framework to support climate change mitigation policy. Ecol. Econ. 89, 61–72 (2013).
Seddon, N. et al. Getting the message right on nature-based solutions to climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 27, 1518–1546 (2021).
pubmed: 33522071
Seddon, N., Turner, B., Berry, P., Chausson, A. & Girardin, C. A. J. Grounding nature-based climate solutions in sound biodiversity science. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 84–87 (2019).
Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests. Science 368, eaaz7005 (2020).
pubmed: 32554569
Matthews, H. D. et al. Temporary nature-based carbon removal can lower peak warming in a well-below 2 °C scenario. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 65 (2022).
Harper, A. B. et al. Land-use emissions play a critical role in land-based mitigation for Paris climate targets. Nat. Commun. 9, 2938 (2018).
pmcid: 6081380
pubmed: 30087330
Pugh, T. A. M., Arneth, A., Kautz, M., Poulter, B. & Smith, B. Important role of forest disturbances in the global biomass turnover and carbon sinks. Nat. Geosci. 12, 730–735 (2019).
pmcid: 6718285
pubmed: 31478009
Lang, J. et al. Net Zero Tracker. Energy and climate intelligence unit, data-driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. https://zerotracker.net (2023).
Matthews, H. D. & Caldeira, K. Stabilizing climate requires near‐zero emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L04705 (2008).
Eby, M. et al. Lifetime of anthropogenic climate change: millennial time scales of potential CO
Solomon, S., Plattner, G. K., Knutti, R. & Friedlingstein, P. Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1704–1709 (2009).
pmcid: 2632717
pubmed: 19179281
Matthews, H. D., Gillett, N. P., Stott, P. A. & Zickfeld, K. The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions. Nature 459, 829–832 (2009).
pubmed: 19516338
Gillett, N. P., Arora, V. K., Matthews, D. & Allen, M. R. Constraining the ratio of global warming to cumulative CO
Canadell, J. G. et al. Global carbon and other biogeochemical cycles and feedbacks. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 177 (Cambridge University Press, 2021).
Costa, P. M. & Wilson, C. An equivalence factor between CO
Fearnside, P. M., Lashof, D. A. & Moura-Costa, P. Accounting for time in mitigating global warming through land-use change and forestry. Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Glob. Chang. 5, 239–270 (2000).
Parisa, Z., Marland, E., Sohngen, B., Marland, G. & Jenkins, J. The time value of carbon storage. Policy Econ. 144, 102840 (2022).
Levasseur, A. et al. Valuing temporary carbon storage. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2, 6–8 (2012).
Chay, F. et al. Unpacking ton-year accounting - CarbonPlan. https://carbonplan.org/research/ton-year-explainer (2022).
Korhonen, R., Pingoud, K., Savolainen, I. & Matthews, R. The role of carbon sequestration and the tonne-year approach in fulfilling the objective of climate convention. Environ. Sci. Policy 5, 429–441 (2002).
Kirschbaum, M. U. F. Temporary carbon sequestration cannot prevent climate change. Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Glob. Chang. 11, 1151–1164 (2006).
Duveiller, G. et al. Revealing the widespread potential of forests to increase low level cloud cover. Nat. Commun. 12, 4337 (2021).
pmcid: 8282670
pubmed: 34267204
Cerasoli, S., Yin, J. & Porporato, A. Cloud cooling effects of afforestation and reforestation at midlatitudes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2026241118 (2021).
pmcid: 8379994
pubmed: 34373327
Simmons, C. T. & Matthews, H. D. Assessing the implications of human land-use change for the transient climate response to cumulative carbon emissions. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 035001 (2016).
Matthews, H. D. et al. Opportunities and challenges in using remaining carbon budgets to guide climate policy. Nat. Geosci. 13, 769–779 (2020).
Bernier, P. Y. et al. Boreal lichen woodlands: a possible negative feedback to climate change in eastern North America. Agric. Meteorol. 151, 521–528 (2011).
Herzog, H., Caldeira, K. & Reilly, J. An issue of permanence: assessing the effectiveness of temporary carbon storage. Clim. Chang. 59, 293–310 (2003).
Mengis, N. et al. Evaluation of the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model version 2.10 (UVic ESCM 2.10). Geosci. Model. Dev. 13, 4183–4204 (2020).
Meissner, K. J., Weaver, A. J., Matthews, H. D. & Cox, P. M. The role of land surface dynamics in glacial inception: a study with the UVic Earth System Model. Clim. Dyn. 21, 515–537 (2003).
Schmittner, A., Oschlies, A., Matthews, H. D. & Galbraith, E. D. Future changes in climate, ocean circulation, ecosystems, and biogeochemical cycling simulated for a business-as-usual CO
Matthews, H. D., Weaver, A. J. & Meissner, K. J. Terrestrial carbon cycle dynamics under recent and future climate change. J. Clim. 18, 1609–1628 (2005).
Weaver, A. J. et al. The UVic earth system climate model: model description, climatology, and applications to past, present and future climates. Atmos. Ocean 39, 361–428 (2001).
MacDougall, A. H., Avis, C. A. & Weaver, A. J. Significant contribution to climate warming from the permafrost carbon feedback. Nat. Geosci. 5, 719–721 (2012).
Matthews, H. D., Weaver, A. J., Meissner, K. J., Gillett, N. P. & Eby, M. Natural and anthropogenic climate change: incorporating historical land cover change, vegetation dynamics and the global carbon cycle. Clim. Dyn. 22, 461–479 (2004).
Matthews, H. D., Eby, M., Weaver, A. J. & Hawkins, B. J. Primary productivity control of simulated carbon cycle–climate feedbacks. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022941 (2005).
Zickfeld, K., Eby, M., Matthews, H. D., Schmittner, A. & Weaver, A. J. Nonlinearity of carbon cycle feedbacks. J. Clim. 24, 4255–4275 (2011).
Eby, M. et al. Historical and idealized climate model experiments: an intercomparison of Earth system models of intermediate complexity. Clim. Past 9, 1111–1140 (2013).
Zickfeld, K. et al. Long-term climate change commitment and reversibility: an EMIC intercomparison. J. Clim. 26, 5782–5809 (2013).
Riahi, K. et al. The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob. Environ. Chang. 42, 153–168 (2017).
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2021. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 1917–2005 (2022).