Quantitative evaluation of pediatric umbilical loop stomas: 2 decades of experience from a single institution.
Postoperative scar
Stoma
Umbilical colostomy
Umbilical ileostomy
Umbilical stoma
Journal
Pediatric surgery international
ISSN: 1437-9813
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Surg Int
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8609169
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Sep 2023
07 Sep 2023
Historique:
accepted:
25
08
2023
medline:
11
9
2023
pubmed:
8
9
2023
entrez:
7
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Since pediatric stomas are often temporary, their creation, management, and closure should be simple, with minimal complications and excellent cosmetic results. We began employing umbilical stomas in 2000. This study aimed to characterize the ingenuity and utility of umbilical stomas and provide a quantitative evaluation of their cosmetic outcomes. We examined cases of stoma construction and closure surgery performed in our department from January 2000 to December 2022. The umbilical and non-umbilical stoma groups included 54 and 42 cases, respectively, and the findings for both groups were compared and analyzed. The two groups showed no significant differences in the incidence of complications. The Manchester Scar Scale score for the umbilical stoma group (8.42 ± 1.85) was significantly better than that for the non-umbilical stoma group (16.31 ± 2.96; P < 0.01). Likewise, in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale assessments, the umbilical stoma group showed significantly better scores in both the observer scale (9.48 ± 2.50 vs. 21.78 ± 7.26; P < 0.01) and the patient scale (10.5 ± 1.39 vs. 22.40 ± 7.35; P < 0.01). Umbilical stomas are easy to manage and yield an inconspicuous closure incision with excellent cosmetic outcomes. Although patient selection is important, pediatric umbilical stomas are a valuable option that can be actively employed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37679509
doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05546-3
pii: 10.1007/s00383-023-05546-3
pmc: PMC10485087
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
269Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Ostomy Wound Manage. 1997 May;43(4):18-22, 24-5
pubmed: 9205395
BMJ Case Rep. 2021 Feb 4;14(2):
pubmed: 33541957
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2022 Jan-Mar;19(1):27-31
pubmed: 34916348
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 14;25(46):6781-6789
pubmed: 31857779
J Perinatol. 2008 May;28 Suppl 1:S14-7
pubmed: 18446170
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Mar;48(3):452-8
pubmed: 23208313
J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Feb;40(2):385-9
pubmed: 15750934
Urol Clin North Am. 2009 May;36(2):147-55, vii
pubmed: 19406316
J Pediatr Surg. 1989 Oct;24(10):973
pubmed: 2809968
J Pediatr Surg. 1982 Aug;17(4):362-4
pubmed: 7120002
Semin Pediatr Surg. 2007 Nov;16(4):266-9
pubmed: 17933669
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Nov;49(11):1631-4
pubmed: 25475808
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Nov;102(6):1954-61
pubmed: 9810991
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1964 May;118:1035-41
pubmed: 14143450
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Jun;63(6):1022-9
pubmed: 19501559
Pediatr Surg Int. 2010 Oct;26(10):963-6
pubmed: 20623293
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7
pubmed: 15253184
Pediatr Surg Int. 2012 Nov;28(11):1133-6
pubmed: 23001137
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 May 18;10(5):e4313
pubmed: 35620506
Qual Life Res. 2014 Sep;23(7):2037-45
pubmed: 24510653
Pediatr Surg Int. 2011 Oct;27(10):1123-6
pubmed: 21626012
Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1262-1268
pubmed: 28782201
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Aug;116(2):514-22
pubmed: 16079683
Wound Repair Regen. 2022 May;30(3):409-416
pubmed: 35388938
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020 Mar;15(1):234-238
pubmed: 32117510
Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(25):2055-63
pubmed: 19888834
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001 Aug;386(5):346-9
pubmed: 11685565
Int J Surg. 2016 Jan;25:38-43
pubmed: 26602967