Finding connection "while everything is going to crap": experiences in Recovery Colleges during the COVID-19 pandemic.
COVID-19
Co-design
Inclusion
Mental health
Pandemic
Participatory action research
Personal recovery
Recovery College
Journal
Research involvement and engagement
ISSN: 2056-7529
Titre abrégé: Res Involv Engagem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101708164
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Sep 2023
07 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
27
04
2023
accepted:
18
08
2023
medline:
8
9
2023
pubmed:
8
9
2023
entrez:
7
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recovery Colleges (RCs) are mental health and well-being education centres where people come together and learn skills that support their wellness. Co-production, co-learning and transformative education are fundamental to RCs. People with lived experience are recognized as experts who partner with health professionals in the design and actualization of educational programming. The pandemic has changed how RCs operate by necessitating a shift from in-person to virtual offerings. Given the relational ethos of RCs, it is important to explore how the experiences of RC members and communities were impacted during this time. To date, there has been limited scholarship on this topic. In this exploratory phase of a larger project, we used participatory action research to interview people who were accessing, volunteering and/or working in RCs across Canada. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty-nine individuals who provided insights on what is important to them about RC programming. Our study was conducted amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, participants elucidated how their involvement in RCs was impacted by pandemic related restrictions. The results of this study demonstrate that RC programming is most effective when it: (1) is inclusive; (2) has a "good vibe"; and (3) equips people to live a fuller life. The pandemic, despite its challenges, has yielded insights into a possible evolution of the RC model that transcends the pandemic-context. In a time of great uncertainty, RCs served as safe spaces where people could redefine, pursue, maintain or recover wellness on their own terms. Recovery Colleges (RCs) are mental health and well-being education centres where people come together and learn skills that support their personal recovery journeys. WHAT DID WE WANT TO KNOW? WHAT APPROACH DID WE TAKE?: In this phase of a larger project, we used a participatory action research approach to interview people who were accessing, volunteering and/or working in RCs across Canada. This research approach draws on the knowledge of all researchers and participants and places equal value on personal and professional experiences. Therefore, this study was created and shaped by, with, and for people who participate in RCs in partnership with academic researchers. WHAT DID WE DO?: Twenty-nine individuals shared what is important to them about RC programming. Our study took place during the COVID-19 pandemic during the pandemic-related restrictions such as social distancing. WHAT DID WE LEARN?: The results of this study demonstrate that RC programming is most effective when it: (1) is inclusive; (2) has a “good vibe”; and (3) equips people to live a fuller life. The pandemic, despite its challenges, could inform an evolution of the RC model that lasts beyond the pandemic.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Recovery Colleges (RCs) are mental health and well-being education centres where people come together and learn skills that support their wellness. Co-production, co-learning and transformative education are fundamental to RCs. People with lived experience are recognized as experts who partner with health professionals in the design and actualization of educational programming. The pandemic has changed how RCs operate by necessitating a shift from in-person to virtual offerings. Given the relational ethos of RCs, it is important to explore how the experiences of RC members and communities were impacted during this time. To date, there has been limited scholarship on this topic.
METHODS
METHODS
In this exploratory phase of a larger project, we used participatory action research to interview people who were accessing, volunteering and/or working in RCs across Canada. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty-nine individuals who provided insights on what is important to them about RC programming.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Our study was conducted amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, participants elucidated how their involvement in RCs was impacted by pandemic related restrictions. The results of this study demonstrate that RC programming is most effective when it: (1) is inclusive; (2) has a "good vibe"; and (3) equips people to live a fuller life.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The pandemic, despite its challenges, has yielded insights into a possible evolution of the RC model that transcends the pandemic-context. In a time of great uncertainty, RCs served as safe spaces where people could redefine, pursue, maintain or recover wellness on their own terms.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Recovery Colleges (RCs) are mental health and well-being education centres where people come together and learn skills that support their personal recovery journeys. WHAT DID WE WANT TO KNOW? WHAT APPROACH DID WE TAKE?: In this phase of a larger project, we used a participatory action research approach to interview people who were accessing, volunteering and/or working in RCs across Canada. This research approach draws on the knowledge of all researchers and participants and places equal value on personal and professional experiences. Therefore, this study was created and shaped by, with, and for people who participate in RCs in partnership with academic researchers. WHAT DID WE DO?: Twenty-nine individuals shared what is important to them about RC programming. Our study took place during the COVID-19 pandemic during the pandemic-related restrictions such as social distancing. WHAT DID WE LEARN?: The results of this study demonstrate that RC programming is most effective when it: (1) is inclusive; (2) has a “good vibe”; and (3) equips people to live a fuller life. The pandemic, despite its challenges, could inform an evolution of the RC model that lasts beyond the pandemic.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Recovery Colleges (RCs) are mental health and well-being education centres where people come together and learn skills that support their personal recovery journeys. WHAT DID WE WANT TO KNOW? WHAT APPROACH DID WE TAKE?: In this phase of a larger project, we used a participatory action research approach to interview people who were accessing, volunteering and/or working in RCs across Canada. This research approach draws on the knowledge of all researchers and participants and places equal value on personal and professional experiences. Therefore, this study was created and shaped by, with, and for people who participate in RCs in partnership with academic researchers. WHAT DID WE DO?: Twenty-nine individuals shared what is important to them about RC programming. Our study took place during the COVID-19 pandemic during the pandemic-related restrictions such as social distancing. WHAT DID WE LEARN?: The results of this study demonstrate that RC programming is most effective when it: (1) is inclusive; (2) has a “good vibe”; and (3) equips people to live a fuller life. The pandemic, despite its challenges, could inform an evolution of the RC model that lasts beyond the pandemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37679794
doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00489-4
pii: 10.1186/s40900-023-00489-4
pmc: PMC10485942
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
77Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 424837
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 424837
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 424837
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 424837
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 424837
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 424837
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 424837
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 424837
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 424837
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Can J Psychiatry. 2014 May;59(5):233-5
pubmed: 25007275
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 22;12:763396
pubmed: 34880792
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2019 Dec;42(4):394-400
pubmed: 31135174
J Ment Health. 2023 Aug;32(4):813-834
pubmed: 36345859
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 15;9(2):e026338
pubmed: 30772865
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Oct;60(10):854-7
pubmed: 16973531
J Ment Health. 2011 Dec;20(6):555-66
pubmed: 22126632
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;199(6):445-52
pubmed: 22130746
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 May 25;80(4):58
pubmed: 27293225
J Ment Health. 2018 Aug;27(4):374-381
pubmed: 29764257
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jan 26;10:26
pubmed: 20102609
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Jun;31(6):1476-84
pubmed: 10849161
J Community Psychol. 2021 Mar;49(2):266-282
pubmed: 33038903
Bioethics. 2019 Sep;33(7):805-813
pubmed: 31099899