Workforce affiliation in primary and secondary prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator patients - a nationwide Danish study.


Journal

European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes
ISSN: 2058-1742
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101677796

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Sep 2023
Historique:
medline: 8 9 2023
pubmed: 8 9 2023
entrez: 8 9 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

There are a paucity of studies investigating workforce affiliation in connection with first-time ICD-implantation. This study explored workforce affiliation and risk markers associated with not returning to work in patients with ICDs. Using the nationwide Danish registers, patients with a first-time ICD-implantation between 2007-2017 and of working age (30-65 years) were identified. Descriptive statistic and logistic regression models were used to describe workforce affiliation and to estimate risk markers associated with not returning to work, respectively. All analyses were stratified by indication for implantation (primary and secondary prevention). Of the 4,659 ICD-patients of working age, 3,300 patients (71%) were members of the workforce (employed, on sick leave or unemployed) (primary: 1428 (43%); secondary:1872 (57%)). At baseline, 842 primary and 1477 secondary prevention ICD-patients were employed. Of those employed at baseline, 81% primary and 75% secondary prevention ICD-patients returned to work within one-year, whereof more than 80% remained employed the following year. Among patients receiving sick leave benefits at baseline, 25% were employed after one-year. Risk markers of not returning to work were 'younger age' in primary prevention ICD-patients, while 'female sex', 'LVEF ≤40', 'lower income' and '≥3 comorbidities' were risk markers in secondary prevention ICD-patients. Lower educational level was a risk marker in both patient groups. High return-to-work proportions following ICD-implantation, with a subsequent high level of employment maintenance were found. Several significant risk markers of not returning to work were identified including 'lower educational level', that posed a risk in both patient groups.Trial registration number: Capital Region of Denmark, P-2019-051.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIM OBJECTIVE
There are a paucity of studies investigating workforce affiliation in connection with first-time ICD-implantation. This study explored workforce affiliation and risk markers associated with not returning to work in patients with ICDs.
METHODS METHODS
Using the nationwide Danish registers, patients with a first-time ICD-implantation between 2007-2017 and of working age (30-65 years) were identified. Descriptive statistic and logistic regression models were used to describe workforce affiliation and to estimate risk markers associated with not returning to work, respectively. All analyses were stratified by indication for implantation (primary and secondary prevention).
RESULTS RESULTS
Of the 4,659 ICD-patients of working age, 3,300 patients (71%) were members of the workforce (employed, on sick leave or unemployed) (primary: 1428 (43%); secondary:1872 (57%)). At baseline, 842 primary and 1477 secondary prevention ICD-patients were employed. Of those employed at baseline, 81% primary and 75% secondary prevention ICD-patients returned to work within one-year, whereof more than 80% remained employed the following year. Among patients receiving sick leave benefits at baseline, 25% were employed after one-year. Risk markers of not returning to work were 'younger age' in primary prevention ICD-patients, while 'female sex', 'LVEF ≤40', 'lower income' and '≥3 comorbidities' were risk markers in secondary prevention ICD-patients. Lower educational level was a risk marker in both patient groups.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
High return-to-work proportions following ICD-implantation, with a subsequent high level of employment maintenance were found. Several significant risk markers of not returning to work were identified including 'lower educational level', that posed a risk in both patient groups.Trial registration number: Capital Region of Denmark, P-2019-051.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37682525
pii: 7264260
doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad054
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Auteurs

Simone H Rosenkranz (SH)

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.

Charlotte H Wichmand (CH)

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.

Lærke Smedegaard (L)

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.

Sidsel Møller (S)

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.
Emergency Medical Services Copenhagen, Denmark.

Jenny Bjerre (J)

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.

Morten Schou (M)

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.

Christian Torp-Pedersen (C)

Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Cardiology, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.

Berit T Philbert (BT)

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Charlotte Larroudé (C)

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.

Thomas M Melchior (TM)

Department of Cardiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.

Jens Cosedis Nielsen (JC)

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Jens Brock Johansen (JB)

Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Sam Riahi (S)

Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Teresa Holmberg (T)

Center for Childhood Health, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Gunnar Gislason (G)

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.
The Danish Heart Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Anne-Christine Ruwald (AC)

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Cardiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH