Simultaneous object detection and segmentation for patient-specific markerless lung tumor tracking in simulated radiographs with deep learning.

DRR deep learning lung tumor tracking markerless tracking

Journal

Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Sep 2023
Historique:
revised: 23 04 2023
received: 27 09 2022
accepted: 12 05 2023
medline: 8 9 2023
pubmed: 8 9 2023
entrez: 8 9 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Real-time tumor tracking is one motion management method to address motion-induced uncertainty. To date, fiducial markers are often required to reliably track lung tumors with X-ray imaging, which carries risks of complications and leads to prolonged treatment time. A markerless tracking approach is thus desirable. Deep learning-based approaches have shown promise for markerless tracking, but systematic evaluation and procedures to investigate applicability in individual cases are missing. Moreover, few efforts have been made to provide bounding box prediction and mask segmentation simultaneously, which could allow either rigid or deformable multi-leaf collimator tracking. The purpose of this study was to implement a deep learning-based markerless lung tumor tracking model exploiting patient-specific training which outputs both a bounding box and a mask segmentation simultaneously. We also aimed to compare the two kinds of predictions and to implement a specific procedure to understand the feasibility of markerless tracking on individual cases. We first trained a Retina U-Net baseline model on digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) generated from a public dataset containing 875 CT scans and corresponding lung nodule annotations. Afterwards, we used an independent cohort of 97 lung patients to develop a patient-specific refinement procedure. In order to determine the optimal hyperparameters for automatic patient-specific training, we selected 13 patients for validation where the baseline model predicted a bounding box on planning CT (PCT)-DRR with intersection over union (IoU) with the ground-truth higher than 0.7. The final test set contained the remaining 84 patients with varying PCT-DRR IoU. For each testing patient, the baseline model was refined on the PCT-DRR to generate a patient-specific model, which was then tested on a separate 10-phase 4DCT-DRR to mimic the intrafraction motion during treatment. A template matching algorithm served as benchmark model. The testing results were evaluated by four metrics: the center of mass (COM) error and the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for segmentation masks, and the center of box (COB) error and the DSC for bounding box detections. Performance was compared to the benchmark model including statistical testing for significance. A PCT-DRR IoU value of 0.2 was shown to be the threshold dividing inconsistent (68%) and consistent (100%) success (defined as mean bounding box DSC > 0.6) of PS models on 4DCT-DRRs. Thirty-seven out of the eighty-four testing cases had a PCT-DRR IoU above 0.2. For these 37 cases, the mean COM error was 2.6 mm, the mean segmentation DSC was 0.78, the mean COB error was 2.7 mm, and the mean box DSC was 0.83. Including the validation cases, the model was applicable to 50 out of 97 patients when using the PCT-DRR IoU threshold of 0.2. The inference time per frame was 170 ms. The model outperformed the benchmark model on all metrics, and the comparison was significant (p < 0.001) over the 37 PCT-DRR IoU > 0.2 cases, but not over the undifferentiated 84 testing cases. The implemented patient-specific refinement approach based on a pre-trained baseline model was shown to be applicable to markerless tumor tracking in simulated radiographs for lung cases.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Real-time tumor tracking is one motion management method to address motion-induced uncertainty. To date, fiducial markers are often required to reliably track lung tumors with X-ray imaging, which carries risks of complications and leads to prolonged treatment time. A markerless tracking approach is thus desirable. Deep learning-based approaches have shown promise for markerless tracking, but systematic evaluation and procedures to investigate applicability in individual cases are missing. Moreover, few efforts have been made to provide bounding box prediction and mask segmentation simultaneously, which could allow either rigid or deformable multi-leaf collimator tracking.
PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to implement a deep learning-based markerless lung tumor tracking model exploiting patient-specific training which outputs both a bounding box and a mask segmentation simultaneously. We also aimed to compare the two kinds of predictions and to implement a specific procedure to understand the feasibility of markerless tracking on individual cases.
METHODS METHODS
We first trained a Retina U-Net baseline model on digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) generated from a public dataset containing 875 CT scans and corresponding lung nodule annotations. Afterwards, we used an independent cohort of 97 lung patients to develop a patient-specific refinement procedure. In order to determine the optimal hyperparameters for automatic patient-specific training, we selected 13 patients for validation where the baseline model predicted a bounding box on planning CT (PCT)-DRR with intersection over union (IoU) with the ground-truth higher than 0.7. The final test set contained the remaining 84 patients with varying PCT-DRR IoU. For each testing patient, the baseline model was refined on the PCT-DRR to generate a patient-specific model, which was then tested on a separate 10-phase 4DCT-DRR to mimic the intrafraction motion during treatment. A template matching algorithm served as benchmark model. The testing results were evaluated by four metrics: the center of mass (COM) error and the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for segmentation masks, and the center of box (COB) error and the DSC for bounding box detections. Performance was compared to the benchmark model including statistical testing for significance.
RESULTS RESULTS
A PCT-DRR IoU value of 0.2 was shown to be the threshold dividing inconsistent (68%) and consistent (100%) success (defined as mean bounding box DSC > 0.6) of PS models on 4DCT-DRRs. Thirty-seven out of the eighty-four testing cases had a PCT-DRR IoU above 0.2. For these 37 cases, the mean COM error was 2.6 mm, the mean segmentation DSC was 0.78, the mean COB error was 2.7 mm, and the mean box DSC was 0.83. Including the validation cases, the model was applicable to 50 out of 97 patients when using the PCT-DRR IoU threshold of 0.2. The inference time per frame was 170 ms. The model outperformed the benchmark model on all metrics, and the comparison was significant (p < 0.001) over the 37 PCT-DRR IoU > 0.2 cases, but not over the undifferentiated 84 testing cases.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The implemented patient-specific refinement approach based on a pre-trained baseline model was shown to be applicable to markerless tumor tracking in simulated radiographs for lung cases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37683107
doi: 10.1002/mp.16705
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : FöFoLe program of the Faculty of Medicine of the LMU Munich
ID : 1113

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Ford EC, Mageras GS, Yorke E, Ling CC. Respiration-correlated spiral CT: a method of measuring respiratory-induced anatomic motion for radiation treatment planning. Med Phys. 2003;30:88-97.
Vedam SS, Keall PJ, Kini VR, Mostafavi H, Shukla HP, Mohan R. Acquiring a four-dimensional computed tomography dataset using an external respiratory signal. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48:45-62.
Ohara K, Okumura T, Akisada M, et al. Irradiation synchronized with respiration gate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;17:853-857.
Kubo HD, Wang L. Compatibility of Varian 2100C gated operations with enhanced dynamic wedge and IMRT dose delivery. Med Phys. 2000;27:1732-1738.
Stromberg JS, Sharpe MB, Kim LH, et al. Active breathing control (ABC) for Hodgkin's disease: reduction in normal tissue irradiation with deep inspiration and implications for treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;48:797-806.
Rosenzweig KE, Hanley J, Mah D, et al. The deep inspiration breath-hold technique in the treatment of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;48:81-87.
Lax I, Blomgren H, Näslund I, Svanström R. Stereotactic radiotherapy of malignancies in the abdomen. Methodological aspects. Acta Oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden). 1994;33:677-683.
Lin L, Souris K, Kang M, et al. Evaluation of motion mitigation using abdominal compression in the clinical implementation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy of liver tumors. Med Phys. 2017;44:703-712.
Keall PJ, Kini VR, Vedam SS, Mohan R. Motion adaptive x-ray therapy: A feasibility study. Phys Med Biol. 2000;46:1-10.
Rottmann J, Keall P, Berbeco R. Markerless EPID image guided dynamic multi-leaf collimator tracking for lung tumors. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58:4195-4204.
Shieh CC, Caillet V, Dunbar M, et al. A Bayesian approach for three-dimensional markerless tumor tracking using kV imaging during lung radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:3065-3080.
Zhang X, Homma N, Ichiji K, Takai Y, Yoshizawa M. Tracking tumor boundary in MV-EPID images without implanted markers: a feasibility study. Med Phys. 2015;42:2510-2523.
Campbell WG, Miften M, Jones BL. Automated target tracking in kilovoltage images using dynamic templates of fiducial marker clusters. Med Phys. 2017;44:364-374.
Shirato H, Shimizu S, Kunieda T, et al. Physical aspects of a real-time tumor-tracking system for gated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;48:1187-1195.
Shirato H, Shimizu S, Shimizu T, Nishioka T, Miyasaka K. Real-time tumour-tracking radiotherapy. Lancet North Am Ed. 1999;353:1331-1332.
Khashab MA, Kim KJ, Tryggestad EJ, et al. Comparative analysis of traditional and coiled fiducials implanted during EUS for pancreatic cancer patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:962-971.
van der Horst A, Wognum S, Dávila Fajardo R, et al. Interfractional position variation of pancreatic tumors quantified using intratumoral fiducial markers and daily cone beam computed tomography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;87:202-208.
Bhagat N, Fidelman N, Durack JC, et al. Complications associated with the percutaneous insertion of fiducial markers in the thorax. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33:1186-1191.
Teske H, Mercea P, Schwarz M, Nicolay NH, Sterzing F, Bendl R. Real-time markerless lung tumor tracking in fluoroscopic video: handling overlapping of projected structures. Med Phys. 2015;42:2540-2549.
Shieh CC, Caillet V, Dunbar M, et al. A Bayesian approach for three-dimensional markerless tumor tracking using kV imaging during lung radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:3065-3080.
Bahig H, Campeau MP, Vu T, et al. Predictive parameters of cyberknife fiducial-less (xsight lung) applicability for treatment of early non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;87:583-589.
Zhao W, Shen L, Han B, et al. Markerless pancreatic tumor target localization enabled by deep learning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;105:432-439.
Zhao W, Han B, Yang Y, et al. Incorporating imaging information from deep neural network layers into image guided radiation therapy (IGRT). Radiother Oncol. 2019;140:167-174.
Takahashi W, Oshikawa S, Mori S. Real-time markerless tumour tracking with patient-specific deep learning using a personalised data generation strategy: proof of concept by phantom study. Br J Radiol. 2020;93:20190420.
Sakata Y, Hirai R, Kobuna K, Tanizawa A, Mori S. A machine learning-based real-time tumor tracking system for fluoroscopic gating of lung radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65:085 014.
Zhou D, Nakamura M, Mukumoto N, Yoshimura M, Mizowaki T. Development of a deep learning-based patient-specific target contour prediction model for markerless tumor positioning. Med Phys. 2022;49:1382-1390.
Shen C, Nguyen D, Zhou Z, Jiang SB, Dong B, Jia X. An introduction to deep learning in medical physics: advantages, potential, and challenges. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65:05TR01.
Teo TP, Ahmed SB, Kawalec P, et al. Feasibility of predicting tumor motion using online data acquired during treatment and a generalized neural network optimized with offline patient tumor trajectories. Med Phys. 2018;45:830-845.
Fedorov A, Hancock M, Clunie D, et al. DICOM re-encoding of volumetrically annotated lung imaging database consortium (LIDC) nodules. Med Phys. 2020;47:5953-5965.
Rit S, Oliva MV, Brousmiche S, Labarbe R, Sarrut D, Sharp GC. The reconstruction toolkit (RTK), an open-source cone-beam CT reconstruction toolkit based on the insight toolkit (ITK). J Phys Conf Ser. 2014;489:012 079.
Jaeger PF, Kohl SAA, Bickelhaupt S, et al. Retina U-Net: embarrassingly simple exploitation of segmentation supervision for medical object detection. Proceedings of the Machine Learning for Health NeurIPS Workshop. PMLR; 2020:171-183.
Schultheiss M, Schmette P, Bodden J, et al. Lung nodule detection in chest X-rays using synthetic ground-truth data comparing CNN-based diagnosis to human performance. Sci Rep. 2021;11:15 857.
Isensee F, Jäger P, Wasserthal J, et al. Batchgenerators - a python framework for data augmentation. Zenodo. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3632567
Simard P, Steinkraus D, Platt J. Best practices for convolutional neural networks applied to visual document analysis. Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 2003. Proceedings. Edinburgh, UK, 2003:958-963. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2003.1227801
van der Walt S, Schönberger JL, Nunez-Iglesias J, et al. Scikit-image: image processing in Python. PeerJ. 2014;2:e453.
Glitzner M, Woodhead PL, Borman PTS, Lagendijk JJW, Raaymakers BW. Technical note: MLC-tracking performance on the Elekta unity MRI-linac. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64:15NT02.
Liu PZY, Dong B, Nguyen DT, et al. First experimental investigation of simultaneously tracking two independently moving targets on an MRI-linac using real-time MRI and MLC tracking. Med Phys. 2020;47:6440-6449.
Yun J, Wachowicz K, Mackenzie M, Rathee S, Robinson D, Fallone BG. First demonstration of intrafractional tumor-tracked irradiation using 2D phantom MR images on a prototype linac-MR. Med Phys. 2013;40:051 718.
Lombardo E, Rabe M, Xiong Y, et al. Offline and online LSTM networks for respiratory motion prediction in MR-guided radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2022;67(9):095006.
Rozario T, Chiu TD, Chen M, et al. A novel markerless lung tumor-tracking method using treatment MV beam imaging. Appl Sci. 2018;8:2525.
de Bruin K, Dahele M, Mostafavi H, Slotman BJ, Verbakel WFAR. Markerless real-time 3-dimensional kV tracking of lung tumors during free breathing stereotactic radiation therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021;6(4):100705.
Teo PT, Crow R, Nest SV, Sasaki D, Pistorius S. Tracking lung tumour motion using a dynamically weighted optical flow algorithm and electronic portal imaging device. Meas Sci Technol. 2013;24:074 012.
Ichiji K, Yoshida Y, Homma N, et al. A key-point based real-time tracking of lung tumor in x-ray image sequence by using difference of Gaussians filtering and optical flow. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63:185 007.
Shieh CC, Keall PJ, Kuncic Z, Huang CY, Feain I. Markerless tumor tracking using short kilovoltage imaging arcs for lung image-guided radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:9437.
Shinohara T, Ichiji K, Wang J, et al. Improved tumor image estimation in X-ray fluoroscopic images by augmenting 4DCT data for radiotherapy. J Adv Comput Intell Intell Informat. 2022;26:471-482.
Mueller M, Poulsen P, Hansen R, et al. The markerless lung target tracking AAPM grand challenge (MATCH) results. Med Phys. 2022;49:1161-1180.

Auteurs

Lili Huang (L)

Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.

Christopher Kurz (C)

Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Philipp Freislederer (P)

Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Farkhad Manapov (F)

Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Stefanie Corradini (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Maximilian Niyazi (M)

Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Claus Belka (C)

Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, a partnership between DKFZ and LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany.
Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany.

Guillaume Landry (G)

Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Marco Riboldi (M)

Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.

Classifications MeSH