ECMO simulation: How much, who to train, and a review of cost, fidelity and performance.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation curriculum Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation simulation cost of simulation simulation training skills assessment

Journal

Perfusion
ISSN: 1477-111X
Titre abrégé: Perfusion
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8700166

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Sep 2023
Historique:
medline: 9 9 2023
pubmed: 9 9 2023
entrez: 8 9 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is a high-risk, low-volume procedure requiring repetition, skill and multiple disciplines with fidelity of communication. Yet many barriers exist to maintain proficiency and skills with variable cost and fidelity. We designed and implemented a low-cost monthly ECMO simulation and hypothesized providers would have increased familiarity and improved teamwork. We also review some key elements of cost, fidelity and evaluation of effectiveness. A structured, 1-hour ECMO simulation was performed on a customized mannikin on a monthly basis in 2022. Qualitative surveys were administered to each member post-simulation. Answers were categorized by theme, including satisfaction of patient care, evaluation of self and team dynamics, and areas for improvement. Most participants were satisfied with their ability to take care of the patient, with common themes of communication and coordination of roles. Identified areas of improvement were mostly limited to technical skills, and soft skills such as communication and teamwork. We designed and implemented a low-cost, monthly and multi-disciplinary ECMO simulation program with overall positive feedback and identified areas for improvement. There remains variability in cost, fidelity and evaluation of performance and retention. There may be a need to create guidelines for ECMO simulation training that can be applied at all institutions utilizing ECMO for patient care.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is a high-risk, low-volume procedure requiring repetition, skill and multiple disciplines with fidelity of communication. Yet many barriers exist to maintain proficiency and skills with variable cost and fidelity. We designed and implemented a low-cost monthly ECMO simulation and hypothesized providers would have increased familiarity and improved teamwork. We also review some key elements of cost, fidelity and evaluation of effectiveness.
METHODS METHODS
A structured, 1-hour ECMO simulation was performed on a customized mannikin on a monthly basis in 2022. Qualitative surveys were administered to each member post-simulation. Answers were categorized by theme, including satisfaction of patient care, evaluation of self and team dynamics, and areas for improvement.
RESULTS RESULTS
Most participants were satisfied with their ability to take care of the patient, with common themes of communication and coordination of roles. Identified areas of improvement were mostly limited to technical skills, and soft skills such as communication and teamwork.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We designed and implemented a low-cost, monthly and multi-disciplinary ECMO simulation program with overall positive feedback and identified areas for improvement. There remains variability in cost, fidelity and evaluation of performance and retention. There may be a need to create guidelines for ECMO simulation training that can be applied at all institutions utilizing ECMO for patient care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37684100
doi: 10.1177/02676591231200988
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2676591231200988

Auteurs

Sandra Loza-Avalos (S)

Department of Surgery, Division of Burns, Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Elizabeth DeAtkine (E)

Department of Surgery, Division of Burns, Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Julie Cox (J)

Cardiovascular and ECMO Program, Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA.

Bethany Lussier (B)

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Matthew Leveno (M)

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Linda A Dultz (LA)

Department of Surgery, Division of Burns, Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Amy Hackmann (A)

Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Caroline Park (C)

Department of Surgery, Division of Burns, Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Classifications MeSH